GNU bug report logs - #31190
Ansible doesn't build

Previous Next

Full log

Message #23 received at 31190 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Roel Janssen <roel <at> gnu.org>
To: Clément Lassieur <clement <at> lassieur.org>
Cc: 31190 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>,
 Jelle Licht <jlicht <at> fsfe.org>
Subject: Re: bug#31190: Ansible doesn't build
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 22:16:11 +0200

Clément Lassieur <clement <at> lassieur.org> writes:

> For the record, patches about it have been sent to guix-patches as well:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/2018-04/msg00332.html.

Right. I didn't see these.  You can ignore mine then.


>
> Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com> writes:
>
>> Jelle Licht <jlicht <at> fsfe.org> writes:
>>
>>> 2018-04-17 22:56 GMT+02:00 Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> Jelle Licht <jlicht <at> fsfe.org> writes:
>>>>
>>>> > From f770998d0f0b56180e0c9a12f0946a77d7ff61a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>> > From: Jelle Licht <jlicht <at> fsfe.org>
>>>> > Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 21:31:05 +0200
>>>> > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: ansible: Add missing inputs
>>>> >
>>>> > * gnu/packages/admin.scm (ansible)[native-inputs]: Add python2-bcrypt and
>>>> >   python2-pynacl.
>>>> > ---
>>>> >  gnu/packages/admin.scm | 5 ++++-
>>>> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>> >
>>>> > diff --git a/gnu/packages/admin.scm b/gnu/packages/admin.scm
>>>> > index aed997e5b..07401af72 100644
>>>> > --- a/gnu/packages/admin.scm
>>>> > +++ b/gnu/packages/admin.scm
>>>> > @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@
>>>> >    #:use-module (gnu packages pkg-config)
>>>> >    #:use-module (gnu packages popt)
>>>> >    #:use-module (gnu packages python)
>>>> > +  #:use-module (gnu packages password-utils)
>>>> >    #:use-module (gnu packages python-crypto)
>>>> >    #:use-module (gnu packages python-web)
>>>> >    #:use-module (gnu packages terminals)
>>>>
>>>> This introduces a circular dependency between (gnu packages admin) and
>>>> (gnu packages password-utils).  Perhaps we should move python-bcrypt to
>>>> python-crypto.scm.  Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Makes sense to me. The `python-py-bcrypt' package is already located there
>>> so it would make sense to have similar packages in the same place.
>>
>> I went ahead and did this in 7c16af4646fac789000495064a13284691dbeb75.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.