Subject: bug#31190: Ansible doesn't build

From: Jelle Licht <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 15:44:20 +0200

2018-04-17 22:56 GMT+02:00 Marius Bakke <[email-masked]>:

> Jelle Licht <[email-masked]> writes:
>
> > From f770998d0f0b56180e0c9a12f0946a77d7ff61a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Jelle Licht <[email-masked]>
> > Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 21:31:05 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: ansible: Add missing inputs
> >
> > * gnu/packages/admin.scm (ansible)[native-inputs]: Add python2-bcrypt and
> >   python2-pynacl.
> > ---
> >  gnu/packages/admin.scm | 5 ++++-
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/gnu/packages/admin.scm b/gnu/packages/admin.scm
> > index aed997e5b..07401af72 100644
> > --- a/gnu/packages/admin.scm
> > +++ b/gnu/packages/admin.scm
> > @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@
> >    #:use-module (gnu packages pkg-config)
> >    #:use-module (gnu packages popt)
> >    #:use-module (gnu packages python)
> > +  #:use-module (gnu packages password-utils)
> >    #:use-module (gnu packages python-crypto)
> >    #:use-module (gnu packages python-web)
> >    #:use-module (gnu packages terminals)
>
> This introduces a circular dependency between (gnu packages admin) and
> (gnu packages password-utils).  Perhaps we should move python-bcrypt to
> python-crypto.scm.  Thoughts?
>

Makes sense to me. The `python-py-bcrypt' package is already located there
so it would make sense to have similar packages in the same place.