From unknown Wed Jun 25 10:48:45 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#31179 <31179@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#31179 <31179@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 26.1; eww leaves processes that slow Emacs Reply-To: bug#31179 <31179@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:48:45 +0000 retitle 31179 26.1; eww leaves processes that slow Emacs reassign 31179 emacs submitter 31179 Alex Branham severity 31179 normal tag 31179 unreproducible notabug thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 16 10:06:51 2018 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2018 14:06:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56019 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f84mQ-0001zi-PR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:06:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51243) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f84mO-0001zV-8Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:06:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f84mE-00060h-Kl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:06:42 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:60393) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f84mE-00060I-He for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:06:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41979) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f84m8-0002FL-Km for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:06:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f84m4-0005pg-Es for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:06:32 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::236]:46814) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f84m4-0005p6-Ar for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:06:28 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-x236.google.com with SMTP id e123-v6so14602123oih.13 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 07:06:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=user-agent:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=5VHrZNShLAmsgTGSH9xvfm8wDsGJRDsgXhnJANFvyeU=; b=C4jTPGFmAA6sByIDPbObCimyfK6ZB7iPWYfTPYCmAgqOeuJfBWfIJ5SNr2GfpCbbg4 PSF+itpiJgdn6umIXunyDFYSBiUii5xWjG31Im8e4QlusgxocV6HKhgxMB4A52FpdNkV 02RQGp0ET0MUUOV4NSXX8ndT7CTnMz9dbBXl8Ruew/5pb3dwUrU2K9GW9vU/7xBARm4t 16k5yeJPU8fiCSO0HWMcI+z716A49BRiLEhGKkuaw65SUy5H9mo1ZargpalyHmxSZLLA N3MqUXOr+4bSzw9joXqBcmMEV6naoUpouIeIljbpsU3Q+9K6OfJ+caE32sK2Dt3udne5 +3Cw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:from:to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=5VHrZNShLAmsgTGSH9xvfm8wDsGJRDsgXhnJANFvyeU=; b=awvIAKtz3drh25FIMaa0VB7D1AJ7lDT7wZRLv7knPnijvcPR7TCnXWn2FJEuvPUh/r /t0sP0AQCqWknGm53V9mYxMk1UUNK90/GKiibOE4zVtTpSsjNwMnabABJG8ATacllp4r 0JybTnzrYwBeKRd0RyLKuO3urz0MrPRZS6K3UAw118sHBC+5VLq1S+6EOVcb2Agw/+h7 +3B6RaFcINpQpjkm4DFvHbmHv8yhqHTkpuoZ1w7iX9BVXQxMrkufrz/Kohp+7v7CR1Kh 4caOk+W+EE6Y8MafQpN23x0mircTFiQKAAuE28vOAoBsP+thZabj5e/P53J4cJCiPX4Z Y7NQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tAvZkvP3xaSYwivEzWb7X4XHT0w9jMcFLo9apavML1Ker2LskhR Q4U/sSWl49nt01yM2o6V4OpYa+ES X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx49g4jn/lRTwTLoX1RAAyfSAYbUvmUNUtFfENeAX55fTuGSpwFLz8jHK26gS5aNrKFv8gKRO4w== X-Received: by 2002:aca:6257:: with SMTP id w84-v6mr13797681oib.132.1523887587208; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 07:06:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mars (nat-128-62-57-160.public.utexas.edu. [128.62.57.160]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o18-v6sm8236389oto.64.2018.04.16.07.06.26 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 16 Apr 2018 07:06:26 -0700 (PDT) User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 From: Alex Branham To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 26.1; eww leaves processes that slow Emacs Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 09:07:49 -0500 Message-ID: <87sh7vtfbe.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Eww is slow and makes Emacs slow when visiting a website with (for example) gifs[1]. Which is understandable, given that a text editor is trying to display a modern web page. However, Emacs is slow even after killing the eww buffer. M-x list-processes shows that several processes are still lying around. Is there a way to make eww kill these? Footnotes: [1] As an example: http://www.mostlymaths.net/2016/09/more-emacs-configuration-tweaks.html In GNU Emacs 26.1 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit, Xaw3d scroll bars) of 2018-04-11 built on mars Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11906000 Configured using: 'configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --libexecdir=/usr/lib --localstatedir=/var --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-gameuser=:games --with-sound=alsa --with-modules --without-gconf --without-gsettings --with-mailutils --with-xml2 --with-x-toolkit=lucid --with-xft --with-xaw3d --with-imagemagick 'CFLAGS=-march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-plt' CPPFLAGS=-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1,--sort-common,--as-needed,-z,relro,-z,now' Configured features: XAW3D XPM JPEG TIFF GIF PNG RSVG IMAGEMAGICK SOUND GPM DBUS NOTIFY ACL GNUTLS LIBXML2 FREETYPE LIBOTF XFT ZLIB TOOLKIT_SCROLL_BARS LUCID X11 MODULES THREADS LIBSYSTEMD LCMS2 Important settings: value of $LANG: en_US.UTF-8 locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 16 10:20:58 2018 Received: (at 31179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2018 14:20:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56036 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f8506-0002LT-Jv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:20:58 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:55267) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f8504-0002LK-C1 for 31179@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:20:57 -0400 Received: from 46.67.12.60.tmi.telenormobil.no ([46.67.12.60] helo=corrigan) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f8500-0006aT-TJ; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:20:55 +0200 Received: from larsi by corrigan with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f84zv-0006mY-06; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:20:47 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Alex Branham Subject: Re: bug#31179: 26.1; eww leaves processes that slow Emacs References: <87sh7vtfbe.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:20:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87sh7vtfbe.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Branham's message of "Mon, 16 Apr 2018 09:07:49 -0500") Message-ID: <87d0yz2pxd.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31179 Cc: 31179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Alex Branham writes: > Eww is slow and makes Emacs slow when visiting a website with (for > example) gifs[1]. Which is understandable, given that a text editor is > trying to display a modern web page. > > However, Emacs is slow even after killing the eww buffer. M-x > list-processes shows that several processes are still lying around. Is > there a way to make eww kill these? What processes are these? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 16 10:23:35 2018 Received: (at 31179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2018 14:23:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56042 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f852d-0002Ps-0W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:23:35 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:55341) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f852b-0002Pj-0r for 31179@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:23:33 -0400 Received: from 46.67.12.60.tmi.telenormobil.no ([46.67.12.60] helo=corrigan) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f852Y-0003Zu-CP; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:23:32 +0200 Received: from larsi by corrigan with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f852R-0006n8-AE; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:23:23 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Alex Branham Subject: Re: bug#31179: 26.1; eww leaves processes that slow Emacs References: <87sh7vtfbe.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:23:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87sh7vtfbe.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Branham's message of "Mon, 16 Apr 2018 09:07:49 -0500") Message-ID: <878t9n2pt5.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31179 Cc: 31179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Alex Branham writes: > However, Emacs is slow even after killing the eww buffer. M-x > list-processes shows that several processes are still lying around. Is > there a way to make eww kill these? > > Footnotes: > [1] As an example: http://www.mostlymaths.net/2016/09/more-emacs-configuration-tweaks.html I tried this, and Emacs went back to using 0% CPU after killing off the ewww buffer, so I'm unable to reproduce this. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 16 10:23:58 2018 Received: (at 31179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2018 14:23:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56048 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f852x-0002Qc-GX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:23:58 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f47.google.com ([209.85.218.47]:45778) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f852q-0002Q7-Vh for 31179@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:23:53 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-f47.google.com with SMTP id j10-v6so545479oii.12 for <31179@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 07:23:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=o8AwjoaIO/AkWWiazmMjyQOWI2YBvYpUMV45XMtPhIA=; b=vfluvNbG24vLnqGvMbp5Z6TBOvIEhX4mul008hpsBOBP3EOSiXekv7mX5o8jyzv4s0 8BqA8gILNhQCdxrtxsZYYcKc2xdIuThpsJZqGdjWqCYHyZnvVE25oHvGfz32xt2OsGBX gH+Cw9ep/KTfb2FXLoL/t0+YSptrg33m0p45M4YU9KTfEjfFv8haH+RpbCUvAfa19XH1 gsj6dpSSoErXpu+OTmfnOF4vzQeNYc25QnYNpKPJ18Lb5PYQxLQdLRSdCCum1OXNBRHf QI+t6nY+0Qb2L2TDxqc2zhmDYA74odI2x004uuwr9lz8Ga9QjEOLyjUzfuQtUXGlzL2T T1xA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=o8AwjoaIO/AkWWiazmMjyQOWI2YBvYpUMV45XMtPhIA=; b=dqIxRp2oHdmu2GXZ0FpHF9t/wPold197UtOgwdUOZmpTBqHR1eM09sqhpAqjxt4j6w bltaxixc4Kx2hlxFtA+E1/K4N7EYyqqJGm3qcXoIDH4OM0Ajf+MaW6K4NH0eKimYz16C 2jK7hgHa3UPooG8//n9XYkQz+hJNM7gNrfu3mSCIB+QjrCVRD5ZX5oeTXomtAr8wl/Oe XRkuJ6UjEXwwEByLlfYofnpoKrMG4/FYyERHDLwsX5QOQv6NnmnzGgCRW9hovsX2xWQ+ +jrYSYvoaPEPw4YuwN4Okyz4kyDbQkENoOYqRfxoMmC29qvFjOhg5W3otOiIuDetgSo2 1BQA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tC2gDosuKDaDs/NpxMqUNmEL2L46sYeluVomDaarLaVjJhWBSL0 1g+SQx2wvTc1EoVOc+WestXj47k4 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx49xs33E41148j7fQEojFwmPiW4tWdoP4bNbulVnoGBywHPtEZRbultQpMbtWlvZ+oLKa4ehkw== X-Received: by 2002:aca:b985:: with SMTP id j127-v6mr3328745oif.6.1523888623149; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 07:23:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mars (nat-128-62-57-160.public.utexas.edu. [128.62.57.160]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 85-v6sm7600405oie.8.2018.04.16.07.23.42 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 16 Apr 2018 07:23:42 -0700 (PDT) References: <87sh7vtfbe.fsf@gmail.com> <87d0yz2pxd.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 From: Alex Branham To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#31179: 26.1; eww leaves processes that slow Emacs In-reply-to: <87d0yz2pxd.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 09:25:07 -0500 Message-ID: <87r2nfteik.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31179 Cc: 31179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Mon 16 Apr 2018 at 09:20, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Alex Branham writes: > >> Eww is slow and makes Emacs slow when visiting a website with (for >> example) gifs[1]. Which is understandable, given that a text editor is >> trying to display a modern web page. >> >> However, Emacs is slow even after killing the eww buffer. M-x >> list-processes shows that several processes are still lying around. Is >> there a way to make eww kill these? > > What processes are these? For that example url I gave, I have in M-x list-processes: resources.bl... -- open -- -- (network connection to resources.blogblog.com) www.blogger.com -- open -- -- (network connection to www.blogger.com) www.mostlyma... -- open -- -- (network connection to www.mostlymaths.net) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 16 10:23:51 2018 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2018 14:23:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56046 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f852t-0002QM-7Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:23:51 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:55347) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f852p-0002QC-4H for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:23:48 -0400 Received: from 46.67.12.60.tmi.telenormobil.no ([46.67.12.60] helo=corrigan) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f852m-0003gg-PH for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:23:46 +0200 Received: from larsi by corrigan with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f852V-0006nB-4E for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:23:27 +0200 To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #31179 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:23:27 +0200 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 31179 unreproducible From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 16 10:26:15 2018 Received: (at 31179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2018 14:26:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56055 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f855D-0002Ub-4u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:26:15 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:55453) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f855B-0002UT-Aa for 31179@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:26:13 -0400 Received: from 46.67.12.60.tmi.telenormobil.no ([46.67.12.60] helo=corrigan) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f8558-0000i4-Hw; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:26:12 +0200 Received: from larsi by corrigan with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f8552-0006nS-W4; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:26:04 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Alex Branham Subject: Re: bug#31179: 26.1; eww leaves processes that slow Emacs References: <87sh7vtfbe.fsf@gmail.com> <87d0yz2pxd.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87r2nfteik.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:25:59 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87r2nfteik.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Branham's message of "Mon, 16 Apr 2018 09:25:07 -0500") Message-ID: <874lkb2poo.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31179 Cc: 31179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Alex Branham writes: >> What processes are these? > > For that example url I gave, I have in M-x list-processes: > > resources.bl... -- open -- -- (network connection to > resources.blogblog.com) > www.blogger.com -- open -- -- (network connection to www.blogger.com) > www.mostlyma... -- open -- -- (network connection to > www.mostlymaths.net) Well, those are open network connections (which url.el keeps around), and aren't processes, and should consume approximately zero CPU... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 16 10:28:09 2018 Received: (at 31179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2018 14:28:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56060 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f856z-0002XG-Gl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:28:08 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f47.google.com ([209.85.218.47]:38031) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f856u-0002Wi-Nu for 31179@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:28:04 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-f47.google.com with SMTP id y20-v6so3213162oix.5 for <31179@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 07:28:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=UzuxaBDun8l8ie6vcyCEV493DgrhmZas0UetgMxGzk4=; b=vfgSk9K65GYWkSiSd0n1VLKAFI1IU1rwVFEs6/H8bhS5X9z6DUIsEFDOBzUvt729h+ eP3sqm91kboeP7GLxrvp4XUiOt4ya9NkCeM96R60EAW+vYclHv+hPg4KfyS6NUk1J/KJ 8Zq7cZnalMKm/paOPwIt/xzPFbdVCMNr9W9lJ7vau6l1SqfYY5Be4k8L4bx3S1gVv0EJ 2nWTpXvzvnJw/jtxhBak8pb79znNccHugG00J/GkPBfZF5TOsPzcbnX3KYrCKmq6JTNp iYJmQB5M7Vm4hc/uim1AmM2NYD9QXaGKtUmxtpYcQgeCQ8XMM3iK/mNxWZx5/OsyW3LR jPNg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=UzuxaBDun8l8ie6vcyCEV493DgrhmZas0UetgMxGzk4=; b=DKm1j2X1aeHW0vW/pCmB5Vb4K9WLP8vYyXjmT7d1FDzAJOZMUuW5mabeGMEG5SAXeJ KSnbCnAZhhASj/yH8S6ikPkmLb0/8rMim1smyFTkEB+osvia5EskuqqGd5yYVbpCKxWq C75dqKZiJHc7lS2rJufzf8TAMysW02VIzDCW7sx5pZcR7JibqKZ2SyqlSvZ1hEJIgyPL UjOWo7y6YBmEsb69pi9rE+AQAHAFzqhC2lbpe8gSJjoAnZnGKhfpGr+TUQX/TSk52Dun JeXt/H+VL6ioWjSU51QuVTKoMoWslAdgvVSnEt+IS4fmqvavF0tjFXgmmPcUx1eHFpfg 6CiA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tDpfSRsA2CUg8o+bcCDvQCaDjvAvCXluXOkGRf0V49cEZcQKCzj qrVbjQASunGZyHAD2QPOQIK6WgN9 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/WDuK9nVkmGt1vSQrMizWv26031GrEqF7s/HKlv5oZdGwJvAWPm07HrnslV3u0ntwsGkHoIA== X-Received: by 2002:aca:3d82:: with SMTP id k124-v6mr15839636oia.168.1523888874999; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 07:27:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mars (nat-128-62-57-160.public.utexas.edu. [128.62.57.160]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b81-v6sm3266428oia.50.2018.04.16.07.27.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 16 Apr 2018 07:27:54 -0700 (PDT) References: <87sh7vtfbe.fsf@gmail.com> <87d0yz2pxd.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87r2nfteik.fsf@gmail.com> <874lkb2poo.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 From: Alex Branham To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#31179: 26.1; eww leaves processes that slow Emacs In-reply-to: <874lkb2poo.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 09:29:19 -0500 Message-ID: <87po2ztebk.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31179 Cc: 31179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Mon 16 Apr 2018 at 09:25, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Alex Branham writes: > >>> What processes are these? >> >> For that example url I gave, I have in M-x list-processes: >> >> resources.bl... -- open -- -- (network connection to >> resources.blogblog.com) >> www.blogger.com -- open -- -- (network connection to www.blogger.com) >> www.mostlyma... -- open -- -- (network connection to >> www.mostlymaths.net) > > Well, those are open network connections (which url.el keeps around), > and aren't processes, and should consume approximately zero CPU... The situation definitely improves for me after closing the eww buffer, but Emacs is still sluggish. I assumed these extra processes were to blame, but perhaps that's not right. I don't know what else could be the culprit though. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 16 10:34:23 2018 Received: (at 31179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2018 14:34:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56064 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f85D5-0004e6-EU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:34:23 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:55685) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f85D3-0004dx-Bb for 31179@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:34:21 -0400 Received: from 46.67.12.60.tmi.telenormobil.no ([46.67.12.60] helo=corrigan) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f85Cl-0008UD-Bx; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:34:20 +0200 Received: from larsi by corrigan with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f85Ca-0006nt-O1; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:33:52 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Alex Branham Subject: Re: bug#31179: 26.1; eww leaves processes that slow Emacs References: <87sh7vtfbe.fsf@gmail.com> <87d0yz2pxd.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87r2nfteik.fsf@gmail.com> <874lkb2poo.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87po2ztebk.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:33:50 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87po2ztebk.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Branham's message of "Mon, 16 Apr 2018 09:29:19 -0500") Message-ID: <87zi231ar5.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31179 Cc: 31179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Alex Branham writes: > The situation definitely improves for me after closing the eww buffer, > but Emacs is still sluggish. I assumed these extra processes were to > blame, but perhaps that's not right. I don't know what else could be the > culprit though. Does `top' say that Emacs is using more CPU after opening and then killing the eww buffer than before? And how long does this last? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 16 11:08:39 2018 Received: (at 31179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2018 15:08:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56092 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f85kF-0007aI-9M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 11:08:39 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:60041) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f85kE-0007a6-3l for 31179@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 11:08:38 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay1.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20AA9AD64; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 15:08:32 +0000 (UTC) From: Andreas Schwab To: Alex Branham Subject: Re: bug#31179: 26.1; eww leaves processes that slow Emacs References: <87sh7vtfbe.fsf@gmail.com> X-Yow: Maybe we could paint GOLDIE HAWN a rich PRUSSIAN BLUE-- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 17:08:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87sh7vtfbe.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Branham's message of "Mon, 16 Apr 2018 09:07:49 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31179 Cc: 31179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) On Apr 16 2018, Alex Branham wrote: > Eww is slow and makes Emacs slow when visiting a website with (for > example) gifs[1]. Which is understandable, given that a text editor is > trying to display a modern web page. > > However, Emacs is slow even after killing the eww buffer. M-x > list-processes shows that several processes are still lying around. Is > there a way to make eww kill these? Does it help to set url-http-attempt-keepalives to nil? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different." From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 16 16:09:48 2018 Received: (at 31179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2018 20:09:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56255 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f8ARc-0003om-4M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:09:47 -0400 Received: from mail-ot0-f176.google.com ([74.125.82.176]:35134) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f8ARW-0003oW-It for 31179@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:09:42 -0400 Received: by mail-ot0-f176.google.com with SMTP id f47-v6so18854793oth.2 for <31179@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 13:09:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=8hrySuWXiDuTLCUQKmD97z89b38sHS1xQ+ZX0u+lSkU=; b=AZC4gA4ByledP2wsfqeQsTuQQt6url1CL50gQUDNIEzbiGhkgNfy+S+IKEamvfMAQS XIA6VXMgkHlbSysGcwI3vKVrIziRC2pO76f1QilcFYEuLjAOEaBlt07tkpK2QVZoR7ZR 7/gK3FarfY3jT+n/Ss0uH3oWDHl7+jBAOH1MoM3+Y/O8RCOgEYO7CDHGw5u9QDxLvJzp qqbNhlgK1uvvmtPQJVKB9wQxjLT45DHIqChezOW8QeCzd8Otgb1WzNmxqb26RUrCeQft R9pYHMBRz5L2Ibb8syHugSev/2YmW3u2gtlTYlzwVKL0UARGIiMNU8X5fJgN03vxrIC2 5/1w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=8hrySuWXiDuTLCUQKmD97z89b38sHS1xQ+ZX0u+lSkU=; b=IDNgraD1VH1fUauo5LXrR2Ntk7FIQYzxaLfDcwILcMfEtsZySOOaorjV80bvUWVzur +8vlUn+xw4VLq7epb873BvrLIcWdElgyJLpkA+E564sY6XA6pF9gHb92mqp4AZ0lyO9A +MfW82RV9kVOqdFG/NoNvRsrrEfYpDrLuAhuHK6MQpewy6uvRp/y4UwPY6FO5e8xe/uN 0bn9e8N8GTeHAdSD2xwm8Oyv/IqUxuNAjvB4Nkg0bB85P3Ke9Bz2AfsTnD+ZNcdBIKEN WHfQk+iUlXGxe2VeEumVG4igODHdNUwrpuVMpv03obgNxkOwKwB0O+O+EjjBwA6ExiXO 8/Mg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tBeiHF4pB7CrP9VGU9Ci8CLRNFk+0iWnJSGWkAxKM42BfBymF6s WlSCH/XmA2/74Zar/7uMOAQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/uRTTs4pJ7OuyIMerRa4XNtbmsvZGxdaP+JAZuYOt0lrG71zkdJRkSGEXQGUKh/0YeuhChMA== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:3135:: with SMTP id e50-v6mr8073593otc.249.1523909372887; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 13:09:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mars (nat-128-62-54-22.public.utexas.edu. [128.62.54.22]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c43-v6sm2653957otj.61.2018.04.16.13.09.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 16 Apr 2018 13:09:32 -0700 (PDT) References: <87sh7vtfbe.fsf@gmail.com> <87d0yz2pxd.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87r2nfteik.fsf@gmail.com> <874lkb2poo.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87po2ztebk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zi231ar5.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 From: Alex Branham To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#31179: 26.1; eww leaves processes that slow Emacs In-reply-to: <87zi231ar5.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 15:10:56 -0500 Message-ID: <87po2ygbe7.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31179 Cc: Andreas Schwab , 31179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Mon 16 Apr 2018 at 09:33, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Does `top' say that Emacs is using more CPU after opening and then > killing the eww buffer than before? And how long does this last? Only slightly. It's at 0% before and at 1% after. The amount of time varies from anywhere between a quarter of a second to maybe 15 or 20 seconds. Setting url-http-attempt-keepalives to nil as Andreas suggested seems to solve the problem. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 16 16:20:04 2018 Received: (at 31179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2018 20:20:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56261 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f8Abb-00043F-QP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:20:04 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:46375) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f8Aba-00042t-8B for 31179@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:20:02 -0400 Received: from 46.67.12.60.tmi.telenormobil.no ([46.67.12.60] helo=corrigan) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f8AbU-0003tb-B6; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 22:19:58 +0200 Received: from larsi by corrigan with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f8AbK-0007yz-Ag; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 22:19:46 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Alex Branham Subject: Re: bug#31179: 26.1; eww leaves processes that slow Emacs References: <87sh7vtfbe.fsf@gmail.com> <87d0yz2pxd.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87r2nfteik.fsf@gmail.com> <874lkb2poo.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87po2ztebk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zi231ar5.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87po2ygbe7.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 22:19:41 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87po2ygbe7.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Branham's message of "Mon, 16 Apr 2018 15:10:56 -0500") Message-ID: <87efjex5sy.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31179 Cc: Andreas Schwab , 31179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Alex Branham writes: > Only slightly. It's at 0% before and at 1% after. The amount of time > varies from anywhere between a quarter of a second to maybe 15 or 20 > seconds. > > Setting url-http-attempt-keepalives to nil as Andreas suggested seems to > solve the problem. Huh. 20 seconds is perhaps the time it takes for url to close the connections normally? But all this points to idle open connections slowing down your Emacs? That's interesting... and shouldn't happen. How sluggish did this make your Emacs? The Emacs network connection code should be asynchronous and not lead to any noticeable delays when you have idle connections, even if they're TLS connections. So it sounds like we might have an obscure bug somewhere in that area? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 13 15:28:07 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 May 2019 19:28:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46281 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hQGcJ-0002oG-IZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2019 15:28:07 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:44586) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hQGcH-0002o7-Cd for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2019 15:28:05 -0400 Received: from [12.41.144.226] (helo=sandy) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hQGcE-0000wK-JO for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2019 21:28:04 +0200 Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 15:28:00 -0400 Message-Id: <87imueupbz.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #31179 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 31179 notabug close 31179 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 31179 notabug close 31179 quit From unknown Wed Jun 25 10:48:45 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 11:24:09 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator