From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Apr 14 23:21:01 2018 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Apr 2018 03:21:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52941 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f7YDs-0004SU-VA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Apr 2018 23:21:01 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53895) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f7YDr-0004SG-Pq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Apr 2018 23:21:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f7YDl-0004jC-Uw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Apr 2018 23:20:54 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:35170) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f7YDl-0004iv-RC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Apr 2018 23:20:53 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44850) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f7YDk-00014J-RO for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Apr 2018 23:20:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f7YDh-0004e2-OO for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Apr 2018 23:20:52 -0400 Received: from cascadia.aikidev.net ([173.255.214.101]:35061) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f7YDh-0004d5-Is for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Apr 2018 23:20:49 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2600:3c01:e000:21:21:21:0:100b]) (Authenticated sender: vagrant@cascadia.debian.net) by cascadia.aikidev.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D5A151B6E2 for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2018 20:20:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Vagrant Cascadian To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Reverse order for old grub.cfg entries Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2018 20:20:27 -0700 Message-ID: <87h8odb1fo.fsf@aikidev.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hi! This is a pretty minor issue, but I've found that the "GNU system, old configurations..." part of the menu would be nicer if the most recent generations were listed at the top, rather than the oldest generations. Currently it lists generation 1 as the first entry in the list, and if I've got 50+ generations installed and I don't want to boot the current generation, I'm most likely going to want to revert to one of the more recent generations rather than the very oldest. live well, vagrant --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEcDardHbDotegGFCHt4uC1IFLkbYFAlrSxPsACgkQt4uC1IFL kbYA3g//U4FzQ8feECONvmb835fsoEbbJc66bOZK8wZ8ggBVXiOfBojMGt/cHboN IfVonuBuZVEKxlhPs/fu5QjTgC2JiqJkyTBCGqq14bpNSIeHS1v2ZfXkwKcKA5Ew 8ymvSMri6dogUvoBYYq2UmS8LxL14ZJNE63d1T07nKMfmGRPC2xf23wotIcH2p5+ wQZ4pBaC/rFW+g+M6k7MbU5GwferQiiUaDxd4JRQlDSOSbsVjFDirsKmh/hfECfv uDLhaNVaQwKwlH2cpgKyKMHTro3e3TApjypO9bXGV0dnahAYDryp8ZZXxkcAGc77 m4V4a81K3OFtitvazSFQd3sWe4l4PMnzbCPtADPoyG4pVvc7VmbV8lEYEoRTcF1w xUA8OgsvhfhrijfqshhLQz3uElTeMk45zHdq9imSH1OV3ExHQAcXvgcxvLY3NBlJ 1Mv2SxvRJnMIe6mwza0vA5DpxE7dW9J6HIAYlAIxNp9bf+/7m8Fy0jQrJMh2IDV3 PTR//UQ3FMktCGgNnRF89m5L/b1t4SYwhTyVOZZHnysEJ0EPCn9mhELP+t0HSvGf EdB7HG3ndxdtDRcjLdWD0XVDOwsdoYilb3JNrMu7xidfK92GVsJV0qYWcqeT9/Al +w1MItfxR3ORT/j8a0RBm8nxnPV4SrZxuxtjfqft6VkaT/R04BE= =QSUo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 16 00:12:53 2018 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2018 04:12:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54804 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f7vVd-0000b3-4o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 00:12:53 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55382) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f7lLE-0006qT-3o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2018 13:21:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f7lL7-000629-T0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2018 13:21:22 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:58699) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f7lL7-000624-Pc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2018 13:21:21 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46341) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f7lL6-0006JK-S4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2018 13:21:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f7lL3-0005vQ-O4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2018 13:21:20 -0400 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:60729) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f7lL3-0005tF-H2 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2018 13:21:17 -0400 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2479821AF7 for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2018 13:21:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 15 Apr 2018 13:21:15 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; bh=bJEZLmY69+sWBRMWPCs8YR0BlfqwZKSetCk1j3tTOD0=; b=Q0hbT70G +Z2w7WR8xisYlNsTFUvtbGcxsKNhqxla7MiVevj5f7RIyV1q6QLrbySEXUJ5GUpf Fvx047063uiAIHNKey2SB3WSc6mhQvcFWmN+5B0ch49AcVFGt8sSof71t6DYdLu0 GV6Fl11mc8K7SkQXZizogtdgJiLn/TlyP8bKwXY3WNgvob/xdP+InajFuXX6rKeL IMgnadpUCp2cA+0+szFDWoJo67d61R4/pv5N90Xg//Ob/oSOE/gC1VicVZncNP5B UigdXVWPnZ7QtD+BfGC3NGReIUiBrIhfK86aNNimkUaxpH8Nmj+ybl2s7L/4bONk 4A6cWO5/z1B0wQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=bJEZLmY69+sWBRMWPCs8YR0BlfqwZ KSetCk1j3tTOD0=; b=CJp4+TpdfW8Iz5OSlA9R3ndBKBV6ansA0D4UAyYPjWxBH whMrcaKYw3ELxiWa12lIuKxGBgD2rBRZr5hkOxKark7sTaBwn1UTnFZ4U76yc9v+ kDiE9GyNSjqoOz/W3mQ9z1GCYtCvgMsIXMwnDh3272fHtNumCf6VdSEv3uLlZOxT lSPfhbTd4pw6pvgV2yxLCXCUs8K1NYqMkVZwVu4L0RXzOSGHd/TyJOhtDxFAemV9 UviSsytT3E7MttUSsQgINhew9fcpvz+sJzkX9OotmCBe9fNcuJin/zrtncE6NLIl hkpaPbM5IV9JBbsONyvtZTHxP7HV4XGIy2JuAFmhg== X-ME-Sender: Received: from parabola (unknown [72.12.220.132]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C2E9C1025C for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2018 13:21:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Joshua Branson To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#31159: Reverse order for old grub.cfg entries References: <87h8odb1fo.fsf@aikidev.net> Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2018 13:22:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87h8odb1fo.fsf@aikidev.net> (Vagrant Cascadian's message of "Sat, 14 Apr 2018 20:20:27 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 00:12:51 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.3 (-----) That's actually a pretty good idea! Vagrant Cascadian writes: > Hi! > > This is a pretty minor issue, but I've found that the "GNU system, old > configurations..." part of the menu would be nicer if the most recent > generations were listed at the top, rather than the oldest generations. > > Currently it lists generation 1 as the first entry in the list, and if > I've got 50+ generations installed and I don't want to boot the current > generation, I'm most likely going to want to revert to one of the more > recent generations rather than the very oldest. > > live well, > vagrant From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 16 10:35:00 2018 Received: (at 31159) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2018 14:35:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56067 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f85Dg-0004ev-Nz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:35:00 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([50.252.239.5]:58334) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f85De-0004ei-Mn for 31159@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:34:58 -0400 Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f85DY-0003Q7-RD; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:34:52 -0400 From: Mark H Weaver To: Vagrant Cascadian Subject: Re: bug#31159: Reverse order for old grub.cfg entries References: <87h8odb1fo.fsf@aikidev.net> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:33:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87h8odb1fo.fsf@aikidev.net> (Vagrant Cascadian's message of "Sat, 14 Apr 2018 20:20:27 -0700") Message-ID: <87y3hnnru3.fsf@netris.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31159 Cc: 31159@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Vagrant Cascadian writes: > This is a pretty minor issue, but I've found that the "GNU system, old > configurations..." part of the menu would be nicer if the most recent > generations were listed at the top, rather than the oldest generations. > > Currently it lists generation 1 as the first entry in the list, and if > I've got 50+ generations installed and I don't want to boot the current > generation, I'm most likely going to want to revert to one of the more > recent generations rather than the very oldest. I agree that it would be better to reverse the order of these entries. Thanks, Mark From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 17 04:16:19 2018 Received: (at 31159) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Apr 2018 08:16:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56642 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f8Lml-0003C3-MQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 04:16:19 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-f182.google.com ([209.85.128.182]:44206) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f8Lmh-0003Bl-MA for 31159@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 04:16:16 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-f182.google.com with SMTP id o15so1874627wro.11 for <31159@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 01:16:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=DSEqg08I/5t0dn9P12APe2rkqz976foFkbZvXbY+a70=; b=M7ih7+PdaVSA5FZECaTI4MAFh00lHr+WDLZeAkNoyfn4ztp5h6bsgfaOOYnyl1S2Hq KBU/lASLHWbFAXNQP/noTNlKQDQvwOOctu7PQsPqN5ECkvOOyTmCka1z4LHyNCXn+Sx9 IWAnimL+xulBKK7ytn4oa6r/a1ZN38zCOzoyM5hBiboAAL5xjKmZHIh0aFEkNcXyidHf 0yFeBbNJJ4zT9mzG5bOSAkRJMZ2Bq51GfgF7Sx4vm1DBM+8QN+WM5faYzkiiFhgmWvOO X6ZHJkq0FB2c5WKKiFdpogFJCNX7qvDHtI614iuYEb5ABPUo7COHKiTQvgm0BTbZbrOm iCDg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=DSEqg08I/5t0dn9P12APe2rkqz976foFkbZvXbY+a70=; b=IJ5XuxYRGHZWvLRbwhQQdOix/bOdk/Ml+lgXl11bncCBIgdPqO5X6OmnfOILD2s//Y vyfFzkRfDC8QIrh7cWGJVryvQzlH+fXzp8WWYOL8fHDux25jE8nPNLAx39XlEdk5N1ue TqanTkrrtnpKURG8d/shCjTC9wMckkNAPZ1F3GLLnRjhOmPh5tJUOWs7u1GQphJgWj77 JcTlZ7VIZ12e+cZZCIzQG6Oc2JkXBX6jJDnSa7gBVTR5a75kpPrvYB1Rso2IM3B7giU+ fyqIvnLppvUshm7G/X3SSNfx35yAhvLECRr4/mBK5Y9xZAXJoOOOCJyg1ZpcPbILT51y CFrw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tC0sHD2kH7hXj85gMKS7atfvivQN9/R05Tb2v7DfttJRuXS4+9h sL2+94rX3MKK8RA9MNVSOcm68w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+3F60BQM5qhqDEzTktoPSCb/e6iKSGKxa3YAIwKpMBWKenhgi3pYTGlBYJZzgz9xbdqAagvQ== X-Received: by 10.223.150.88 with SMTP id c24mr743845wra.190.1523952969691; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 01:16:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from denali ([46.218.109.88]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k184sm10569178wmk.21.2018.04.17.01.16.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 17 Apr 2018 01:16:08 -0700 (PDT) References: <87h8odb1fo.fsf@aikidev.net> <87y3hnnru3.fsf@netris.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 25.3.1 From: Mathieu Othacehe To: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: bug#31159: Reverse order for old grub.cfg entries In-reply-to: <87y3hnnru3.fsf@netris.org> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 10:16:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87a7u2qmd4.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31159 Cc: Vagrant Cascadian , 31159@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hi, This seems like a good idea ! If we decide to make it unconditional the patch attached does the job. We can also make it configurable in bootloader-configuration for instance. WDYT ? Mathieu --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-diff Content-Disposition: inline; filename=0001-scripts-system-Sort-profile-generations-in-reverse-o.patch >From 3ec63fb55a074b547724c70d560cc61776c9298e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mathieu Othacehe Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 09:23:00 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] scripts: system: Sort profile generations in reverse order. * guix/scripts/system.scm (profile-boot-parameters): Reverse generation-numbers list. This allows old generations to be listed from most recent to oldest in bootloaders configuration files. --- guix/scripts/system.scm | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/guix/scripts/system.scm b/guix/scripts/system.scm index b50cabc..7e1363c 100644 --- a/guix/scripts/system.scm +++ b/guix/scripts/system.scm @@ -393,9 +393,11 @@ it atomically, and then run OS's activation script." "~Y-~m-~d ~H:~M"))) (define* (profile-boot-parameters #:optional (profile %system-profile) - (numbers (generation-numbers profile))) - "Return a list of 'boot-parameters' for the generations of PROFILE specified by -NUMBERS, which is a list of generation numbers." + (numbers + (reverse (generation-numbers profile)))) + "Return a list of 'boot-parameters' for the generations of PROFILE specified +by NUMBERS, which is a list of generation numbers. The list is ordered from +the most recent to the oldest profiles." (define (system->boot-parameters system number time) (unless-file-not-found (let* ((params (read-boot-parameters-file system)) -- 2.7.4 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Mark H Weaver writes: > Vagrant Cascadian writes: > >> This is a pretty minor issue, but I've found that the "GNU system, old >> configurations..." part of the menu would be nicer if the most recent >> generations were listed at the top, rather than the oldest generations. >> >> Currently it lists generation 1 as the first entry in the list, and if >> I've got 50+ generations installed and I don't want to boot the current >> generation, I'm most likely going to want to revert to one of the more >> recent generations rather than the very oldest. > > I agree that it would be better to reverse the order of these entries. > > Thanks, > Mark --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 17 14:19:58 2018 Received: (at 31159) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Apr 2018 18:19:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57807 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f8VCw-00029P-G3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 14:19:58 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([50.252.239.5]:34374) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f8VCu-00029C-Ms for 31159@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 14:19:56 -0400 Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f8VCo-0001dC-IN; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 14:19:50 -0400 From: Mark H Weaver To: Mathieu Othacehe Subject: Re: bug#31159: Reverse order for old grub.cfg entries References: <87h8odb1fo.fsf@aikidev.net> <87y3hnnru3.fsf@netris.org> <87a7u2qmd4.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 14:18:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87a7u2qmd4.fsf@gmail.com> (Mathieu Othacehe's message of "Tue, 17 Apr 2018 10:16:07 +0200") Message-ID: <878t9llmr7.fsf@netris.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31159 Cc: Vagrant Cascadian , Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 31159@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Mathieu Othacehe writes: > This seems like a good idea ! If we decide to make it unconditional the > patch attached does the job. We can also make it configurable in > bootloader-configuration for instance. > > WDYT ? Thank you, Mathieu! I doubt that there's a need to make this configurable, but I'd like to hear an opinion from Ludovic, since I guess he was the one who implemented the current ordering. What do you think, Ludovic? Mark > From 3ec63fb55a074b547724c70d560cc61776c9298e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Mathieu Othacehe > Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 09:23:00 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] scripts: system: Sort profile generations in reverse order. > > * guix/scripts/system.scm (profile-boot-parameters): Reverse > generation-numbers list. This allows old generations to be listed from most > recent to oldest in bootloaders configuration files. > --- > guix/scripts/system.scm | 8 +++++--- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/guix/scripts/system.scm b/guix/scripts/system.scm > index b50cabc..7e1363c 100644 > --- a/guix/scripts/system.scm > +++ b/guix/scripts/system.scm > @@ -393,9 +393,11 @@ it atomically, and then run OS's activation script." > "~Y-~m-~d ~H:~M"))) > > (define* (profile-boot-parameters #:optional (profile %system-profile) > - (numbers (generation-numbers profile))) > - "Return a list of 'boot-parameters' for the generations of PROFILE specified by > -NUMBERS, which is a list of generation numbers." > + (numbers > + (reverse (generation-numbers profile)))) > + "Return a list of 'boot-parameters' for the generations of PROFILE specified > +by NUMBERS, which is a list of generation numbers. The list is ordered from > +the most recent to the oldest profiles." > (define (system->boot-parameters system number time) > (unless-file-not-found > (let* ((params (read-boot-parameters-file system)) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Apr 18 10:04:49 2018 Received: (at 31159) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Apr 2018 14:04:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59449 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f8nhZ-00051R-42 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 10:04:49 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:36758) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f8nhX-00051K-RV for 31159@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 10:04:48 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE61122BF; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:04:46 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RpYKkcBJW18O; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:04:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ribbon (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7E6E411F0A; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:04:45 +0200 (CEST) From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: bug#31159: Reverse order for old grub.cfg entries References: <87h8odb1fo.fsf@aikidev.net> <87y3hnnru3.fsf@netris.org> <87a7u2qmd4.fsf@gmail.com> <878t9llmr7.fsf@netris.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 29 Germinal an 226 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:04:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: <878t9llmr7.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Tue, 17 Apr 2018 14:18:52 -0400") Message-ID: <87604oy5j7.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31159 Cc: Vagrant Cascadian , Mathieu Othacehe , 31159@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Hello, Mark H Weaver skribis: > Mathieu Othacehe writes: > >> This seems like a good idea ! If we decide to make it unconditional the >> patch attached does the job. We can also make it configurable in >> bootloader-configuration for instance. >> >> WDYT ? > > Thank you, Mathieu! I doubt that there's a need to make this > configurable, but I'd like to hear an opinion from Ludovic, since I > guess he was the one who implemented the current ordering. > > What do you think, Ludovic? I agree with you. As long as the entry labels clearly show which one is the most recent, that sounds good. However! On headless machines, we=E2=80=99d rather make sure users know ab= out this change. On our Libreboot =E2=80=9Cbayfront=E2=80=9D server, GRUB for = some reason fails to display anything, and on several occasions we=E2=80=99ve had to bl= indly select an older generation. Hopefully this is an unusual situation ;-), but it could happen on ARM boards as well. Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Apr 18 15:24:25 2018 Received: (at 31159) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Apr 2018 19:24:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59646 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f8sgr-0001Kt-A9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 15:24:25 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([50.252.239.5]:41562) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f8sgp-0001Kg-Ur for 31159@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 15:24:24 -0400 Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f8sgk-0001yy-4X; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 15:24:18 -0400 From: Mark H Weaver To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: bug#31159: Reverse order for old grub.cfg entries References: <87h8odb1fo.fsf@aikidev.net> <87y3hnnru3.fsf@netris.org> <87a7u2qmd4.fsf@gmail.com> <878t9llmr7.fsf@netris.org> <87604oy5j7.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 15:23:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87604oy5j7.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:04:44 +0200") Message-ID: <87bmegiajc.fsf@netris.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31159 Cc: Vagrant Cascadian , Mathieu Othacehe , 31159@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Ludovic, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > I agree with you. As long as the entry labels clearly show which one is > the most recent, that sounds good. > > However! On headless machines, we=E2=80=99d rather make sure users know = about > this change. On our Libreboot =E2=80=9Cbayfront=E2=80=9D server, GRUB fo= r some reason > fails to display anything, and on several occasions we=E2=80=99ve had to = blindly > select an older generation. Hopefully this is an unusual situation ;-), > but it could happen on ARM boards as well. Do you have an idea of how to make sure that users know about it? Mark From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Apr 18 16:14:40 2018 Received: (at 31159) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Apr 2018 20:14:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59674 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f8tTU-0002Xm-B6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:14:40 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:39600) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f8tTS-0002Xe-BD for 31159@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:14:39 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590FE128BD; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 22:14:37 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HWZuEVpGn-ej; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 22:14:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ribbon (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF011127C1; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 22:14:35 +0200 (CEST) From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: bug#31159: Reverse order for old grub.cfg entries References: <87h8odb1fo.fsf@aikidev.net> <87y3hnnru3.fsf@netris.org> <87a7u2qmd4.fsf@gmail.com> <878t9llmr7.fsf@netris.org> <87604oy5j7.fsf@gnu.org> <87bmegiajc.fsf@netris.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 29 Germinal an 226 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 22:14:35 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87bmegiajc.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Wed, 18 Apr 2018 15:23:19 -0400") Message-ID: <87a7u0w9uc.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31159 Cc: Vagrant Cascadian , Mathieu Othacehe , 31159@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Mark H Weaver skribis: > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: >> I agree with you. As long as the entry labels clearly show which one is >> the most recent, that sounds good. >> >> However! On headless machines, we=E2=80=99d rather make sure users know= about >> this change. On our Libreboot =E2=80=9Cbayfront=E2=80=9D server, GRUB f= or some reason >> fails to display anything, and on several occasions we=E2=80=99ve had to= blindly >> select an older generation. Hopefully this is an unusual situation ;-), >> but it could happen on ARM boards as well. > > Do you have an idea of how to make sure that users know about it? Not really. I think we can at least send a heads-up to guix-devel and help-guix. Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 19 11:22:06 2018 Received: (at 31159) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Apr 2018 15:22:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33091 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f9BNu-00037I-6D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 11:22:06 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-f174.google.com ([209.85.128.174]:40909) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f9BNp-00036c-IM for 31159@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 11:22:02 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-f174.google.com with SMTP id v60-v6so15102624wrc.7 for <31159@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 08:22:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=v77vxtaRTruoNucVNhz7Q9m10Uvv7dGyx+En4q44tMs=; b=DiQe6A4Ofv9IgWjlnUM7ThjZfvCaWYJ4RjTQkMw1EaAEwOvybWXcHNKbB1blLGcOOE P9G0oITSrosE17WJ3C2QGvpBxYiYAU6yoykdsXZm/SvxgcX4vhEOC9Bp/qqjV+kavpM8 LbtTfKpx03YB4Nd4F46eqM/HWim8HNujcdsYVhYLw8JxCBUVE1K2cuPxNJobVFPx8vLw C7KZYJ+Z8vOlo23KTn2XiaRNQzU+ZhPS8pCfz0x1Wgtv9J7xWTyiBHlbRIjmCDCI7Ss0 vN/2UgskLuz0lxeEMWZUq50pqZ2t9dag/JWqJKxqVD2H4vbgkqONerM7fQtlCYj0wfa7 PsXg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=v77vxtaRTruoNucVNhz7Q9m10Uvv7dGyx+En4q44tMs=; b=Nx/I+UD67B2Z2mm7bYfW95ak5mgnaY6zLCntk7bPj5IZvTEHdAa+uNu4OgumvankPK v8YqMpS07+p3IaY5pG4maJcmIixpV9mnxVbkQBmVt/pNmyRjfd8pToXFO12O4wUxQ2Hi ZzcK+23CUgW+ARUtWecOsWIl+1BGjjADG4eiITazo1obyVPN+wkZsMJh6eQWTrzgaCDf mEoohvdBIrOWyqITYXpL+4jyRHOxVU+TqW7OCW83RfLeBJQ1+L/b0JGs7BBsvJiOaKCQ 2NjlxzNvGJnw6A9iSOs7opbP+9EC2Vllb2dpFD9tZ6LpmtcJv4IoZM+KyhDfO7W8E6LB vXbw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tAxti5UZsglFL4qbsCMTdKIBrfMCxPJm7PQ9VaeaPi6rQ7KfRaP 0RknIsiQq9t3ub75hKr3jm6vJw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4946G2/KxQN28TLUHQlv/+faj8iGMfuNo+s/55ARVj0myJhR69GJSCUKmo6aXtn8mohP8HFhA== X-Received: by 10.28.148.82 with SMTP id w79mr5261783wmd.64.1524151315226; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 08:21:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from denali ([46.218.109.88]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h16-v6sm3218951wri.16.2018.04.19.08.21.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 19 Apr 2018 08:21:54 -0700 (PDT) References: <87h8odb1fo.fsf@aikidev.net> <87y3hnnru3.fsf@netris.org> <87a7u2qmd4.fsf@gmail.com> <878t9llmr7.fsf@netris.org> <87604oy5j7.fsf@gnu.org> <87bmegiajc.fsf@netris.org> <87a7u0w9uc.fsf@gnu.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 25.3.1 From: Mathieu Othacehe To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: bug#31159: Reverse order for old grub.cfg entries In-reply-to: <87a7u0w9uc.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 17:21:54 +0200 Message-ID: <87po2vw7al.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31159 Cc: Vagrant Cascadian , Mark H Weaver , 31159@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) > Not really. I think we can at least send a heads-up to guix-devel and > help-guix. Ok. Would the attached patch earlier in the thread be ok for you then ? Thanks, Mathieu From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 23 11:16:49 2018 Received: (at 31159) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Apr 2018 15:16:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37223 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fAdCz-0007t9-7X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 11:16:49 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:57990) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fAdCx-0007t1-Uk for 31159@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 11:16:48 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E4F7E90F; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 17:16:47 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VXCOMapXel-M; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 17:16:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ribbon (unknown [193.50.110.139]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B9EBCE900; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 17:16:46 +0200 (CEST) From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Mathieu Othacehe Subject: Re: bug#31159: Reverse order for old grub.cfg entries References: <87h8odb1fo.fsf@aikidev.net> <87y3hnnru3.fsf@netris.org> <87a7u2qmd4.fsf@gmail.com> <878t9llmr7.fsf@netris.org> <87604oy5j7.fsf@gnu.org> <87bmegiajc.fsf@netris.org> <87a7u0w9uc.fsf@gnu.org> <87po2vw7al.fsf@gmail.com> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 4 =?utf-8?Q?Flor=C3=A9al?= an 226 de la =?utf-8?Q?R?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 17:16:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87po2vw7al.fsf@gmail.com> (Mathieu Othacehe's message of "Thu, 19 Apr 2018 17:21:54 +0200") Message-ID: <87k1syymu9.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31159 Cc: Vagrant Cascadian , Mark H Weaver , 31159@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Mathieu Othacehe skribis: >> Not really. I think we can at least send a heads-up to guix-devel and >> help-guix. > > Ok. Would the attached patch earlier in the thread be ok for you then ? Sure! Ludo'. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 31 05:21:38 2018 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 May 2018 09:21:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55609 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fOJm6-00078W-5o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2018 05:21:38 -0400 Received: from mail.lassieur.org ([83.152.10.219]:33960) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fOJm3-00078O-TG for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2018 05:21:36 -0400 Received: from newt (smtp.parrot.biz [62.23.167.188]) by mail.lassieur.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 2bd69921 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256:NO) for ; Thu, 31 May 2018 09:21:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 11:21:34 +0200 Message-Id: <87r2lsji3l.fsf@lassieur.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: clement@lassieur.org (=?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur) Subject: control message for bug #31159 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 31159 fixed close 31159 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 31 18:07:41 2018 Received: (at 31159) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 May 2018 22:07:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56337 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fOVjR-0007te-GG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2018 18:07:41 -0400 Received: from cascadia.aikidev.net ([173.255.214.101]:33064) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fOVjQ-0007tN-07 for 31159@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2018 18:07:40 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2600:3c01:e000:21:21:21:0:100b]) (Authenticated sender: vagrant@cascadia.debian.net) by cascadia.aikidev.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E8CD61AA2E for <31159@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 31 May 2018 15:07:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Vagrant Cascadian To: 31159@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: #31159: Reverse order for old grub.cfg entries In-Reply-To: References: <87r2lsji3l.fsf@lassieur.org> <87h8odb1fo.fsf@aikidev.net> Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 15:07:22 -0700 Message-ID: <87muwfqy1x.fsf@aikidev.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31159 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain On 2018-05-31, GNU bug Tracking System wrote: > This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report > #31159: Reverse order for old grub.cfg entries, > which was filed against the guix package. > > Thank you for your report, which has now been closed. > You can view the full report at > http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=31159 I don't see that the proposed patch was applied to any of the guix branches I'm aware of. Has it been merged and just not yet been pushed? Does it need to go to guix-patches instead of guix-bugs? Thanks! live well, vagrant --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEcDardHbDotegGFCHt4uC1IFLkbYFAlsQchoACgkQt4uC1IFL kbZM/g/+Lo2FABGJt+j6EYAYfsvqTtFxeS86LVxiXLp8iVqcxR8gQrLzxjfr2ptx 0z6dExBcPgCpW5ftCcrGrqv5lmm3raAUYwQxX6FsIvoiaJKupZAZ/1S5UC+IS0tR oKZiDuewZcPJZ7xYWcq7r9HzHrFMin60a0F8+Y03G2+XXPMI+jB9iEW6a35V4m/e 1uRlt37wUkCVzyZPeFPLGxgjkkNOqdwMSfdMHXkjYbsZDinPqnHNygRk+llMaukl qSev2yZ3CLbfPeroNA+gvFd6cLrysxQ8bIzqRth57hhN6WhBeqTAvrXfhBRorczC uTNEHKY1soq2TTPxBAiRkGzoRxWQQy5ZvvZv1A7fJFSIPoeUWV6QGgS1Ul+b2s2p hRxsK04Z7HyGuXP4qG/YzoreFsiX7inP6W1ZZHEe9nevum52y5rt6nHutz8aBoYO CjDHY+kBBCTvj8T3A8fwjdwL78aLvXizTwpJ+meF3xpuQUUBxOgo9iDPVBB3Rdgk ibjMyo7p3JXIddoQqfBOGZBnh+afZDApx0lA3nkKdZn7w/d3y/s5aS5sGT+9kS2h MOxHDz3pjVb4aZLXaHS/LH4ShxyaM1F3DJSh9QFq+liFDjXgmg+fVuM0rK8DzpQS 6VjNIsIKEnVR+wSwauTgbhctlJYBWA9LTXvGkvf3d+e9+Hqy9KI= =1JO7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 31 22:19:36 2018 Received: (at 31159) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jun 2018 02:19:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56455 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fOZfE-0001qR-5V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 31 May 2018 22:19:36 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:57632) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fOZfC-0001q8-Gb; Thu, 31 May 2018 22:19:34 -0400 Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fOZf6-000796-Lr; Thu, 31 May 2018 22:19:28 -0400 From: Mark H Weaver To: clement@lassieur.org (=?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur) Subject: Re: bug#31159: #31159: Reverse order for old grub.cfg entries References: <87r2lsji3l.fsf@lassieur.org> <87h8odb1fo.fsf@aikidev.net> <87muwfqy1x.fsf@aikidev.net> Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 22:18:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87muwfqy1x.fsf@aikidev.net> (Vagrant Cascadian's message of "Thu, 31 May 2018 15:07:22 -0700") Message-ID: <87y3fzdzbj.fsf@netris.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31159 Cc: Vagrant Cascadian , 31159@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) reopen 31159 tags 31159 - fixed thanks Hi Cl=C3=A9ment, According to our bug tracking system, you added the "fixed" tag to bug 31159 and closed it. I think this must have been a mistake. Did you intend to close a different bug? This bug has to do with the fact that the order of old grub.cfg entries should arguably be reversed. Mark Vagrant Cascadian writes: > On 2018-05-31, GNU bug Tracking System wrote: >> This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report >> #31159: Reverse order for old grub.cfg entries, >> which was filed against the guix package. >> >> Thank you for your report, which has now been closed. >> You can view the full report at >> http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D31159 > > I don't see that the proposed patch was applied to any of the guix > branches I'm aware of. Has it been merged and just not yet been pushed? > Does it need to go to guix-patches instead of guix-bugs? > > Thanks! > > live well, > vagrant From unknown Sun Aug 17 22:09:56 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: Did not alter fixed versions and reopened. Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 02:20:02 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # Did not alter fixed versions and reopened. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 01 03:46:10 2018 Received: (at 31159-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jun 2018 07:46:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56643 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fOelF-0004Sk-UZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2018 03:46:10 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com ([74.125.82.65]:52682) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fOelD-0004SJ-Un for 31159-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2018 03:46:08 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f65.google.com with SMTP id 18-v6so1153916wml.2 for <31159-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 01 Jun 2018 00:46:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PWuAcpVPj4y5Hn9OjE6yoSgjR/edcQMlxlD7nd0Xg+4=; b=ML+hhcSi8XNY18fojIxloTkrf/5X1k8ZRI6svkK0Q2cnLoJQ28i6MiEnfdewkeD20E fJ3edXRzpwZGRV/k1EHIwjA0Lh9IFUpPFWXrkRAAnEWxoWcCleAAJS4vluuC5pwUKts6 hfqai+WcaadW0EOsOcw3K0MFdBkWbeJ8Lc4w9aRvS0PSAnCY5ghBrcZw4dL4ihXXVzDI YbuOBryqY1fkqm9zAyJDAScn187OHiVH83+r71uGTeXH+VlXlotisz13vbb2rN8ZJgUj EdTq5TlUQFeVqOeq3bYbSsMOV3RFq6/5RG2HbfsPPrQoOqzmuTYuu7rRmIJ+OdgN4CRk icPg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PWuAcpVPj4y5Hn9OjE6yoSgjR/edcQMlxlD7nd0Xg+4=; b=OjXnzc+9djrqu/IPd5ch7D3nSj4cwuYDYetAcsm4sLN/LMj5xixyyHY0N2Q/sfmPYA JAwoYCT+/jwJ+An3RDWyZABRO12RiJJm/paEXiVgPiib9Cca/5KAoqAoWyHsKX1MVydm jaMIyY57E9/VxxuBjjjnNqCJwhico8EA1t0mXcIcJE3K2K3Fz2U5ofQe1abAjlnb9tDW vUiiOgbN4zyItu/K+EGLE5Ews4ua9C9kR5qaQPp1DA+dwBrZDB9paCZEVT4uMmnRG3lt 0Wuj4o6i4A4hS7LiG09uPcT91eB5xfhcjVc0QlnEgBXU3po/5zuNoCgemaML75+J2SqG YlAQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwdaPxBL5I3qN5P0ZY21vkaK3fxi/+ezIN9xsZTonMiQMtlB9l8F L2GFrsEkAFlsLb4d/X6kBBHrWw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKIDsBgf+ATjmCEYLEAVsfTOSAzKBFAuyOEIkwEgsmyqJ/dZ2GU5u70Iylr9GkEk1wiR0fRr/A== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:b70b:: with SMTP id h11-v6mr1844248wmf.1.1527839162269; Fri, 01 Jun 2018 00:46:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from denali (smtp.parrot.biz. [62.23.167.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w14-v6sm772201wmc.15.2018.06.01.00.46.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 01 Jun 2018 00:46:01 -0700 (PDT) References: <87r2lsji3l.fsf@lassieur.org> <87h8odb1fo.fsf@aikidev.net> <87muwfqy1x.fsf@aikidev.net> <87y3fzdzbj.fsf@netris.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 From: Mathieu Othacehe To: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: bug#31159: #31159: Reverse order for old grub.cfg entries In-reply-to: <87y3fzdzbj.fsf@netris.org> Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 09:46:00 +0200 Message-ID: <87h8mneypz.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31159-done Cc: Vagrant Cascadian , help-guix , 31159-done@debbugs.gnu.org, =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello, I tought this one was pushed and told Cl=C3=A9ment it was ok to push, my mistake! I just pushed it, so I close the ticket now. To people used to select bootloader entries with shortcuts, be aware that at next reconfigure, the entries will be reversed on all bootloaders (top of the list =3D> most recent configuration). Thanks, Mathieu Mark H Weaver writes: > reopen 31159 > tags 31159 - fixed > thanks > > Hi Cl=C3=A9ment, > > According to our bug tracking system, you added the "fixed" tag to bug > 31159 and closed it. I think this must have been a mistake. Did you > intend to close a different bug? This bug has to do with the fact that > the order of old grub.cfg entries should arguably be reversed. > > Mark > > > Vagrant Cascadian writes: > >> On 2018-05-31, GNU bug Tracking System wrote: >>> This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report >>> #31159: Reverse order for old grub.cfg entries, >>> which was filed against the guix package. >>> >>> Thank you for your report, which has now been closed. >>> You can view the full report at >>> http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D31159 >> >> I don't see that the proposed patch was applied to any of the guix >> branches I'm aware of. Has it been merged and just not yet been pushed? >> Does it need to go to guix-patches instead of guix-bugs? >> >> Thanks! >> >> live well, >> vagrant From unknown Sun Aug 17 22:09:56 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator