GNU bug report logs - #31157
Advice for help2man does not work for parallel builds

Previous Next

Full log

Message #22 received at 31157 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl <at> gnu.org>
To: Peter Johansson <trojkan <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 31157 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>,
 Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org>
Subject: Re: bug#31157: Advice for help2man does not work for parallel builds
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2018 12:07:19 +0200

Hello Peter,

Peter Johansson <trojkan <at> gmail.com> writes:

> On 4/22/2018 1:13 AM, Mathieu Lirzin wrote:
>> Hello Reuben,
>>
>> Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org> writes:
>>
>>> In the manual, we are given the following pattern for using help2man
>>> without breaking make distcheck:
>>>
>>> foo.1: foo.c $(top_srcdir)/configure.ac
>>> $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) foo$(EXEEXT)
>>> help2man --output=foo.1 ./foo$(EXEEXT)
>>>
>>> The problem is that with make -j this can result in two attempts to
>>> make a library in parallel (suppose that we have:
>>>
>>> foo_LDADD = libfoo.la
>>> lib_LTLIBRARIES = libfoo.la
>>>
>>> ). This can fail, and in any case is wasteful.
>> Have you identified the reason why this can fail?  because
>
> One problem is that the rule for foo.1 can be triggered before
> foo.$(EXEEXT) exists and the rule needs foo.$(EXEEXT) or help2man will
> fail. In a -j1 build this is never a problem as binaries are built
> before man pages.

with the ‘$(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) foo$(EXEEXT)’ recipe line, normally
this ensures that the ‘foo$(EXEEXT)’ is built at least once.  My
question was about understanding why building a program/library twice
may end up in a failure in a parallel context.

The answer from Reuben was that since compilation is not thead safe when
for example deleting shared temporary files, then concurrent processes
might impact each other.

> When the 'missing' script changed behaviour in Automake 1.13 (and
> became useless imvho), we changed the rule in one project so foo.1
> depended on foo.$(EXEEXT) but not if we are 1) building from a tarball
> and 2) foo.$(EXEEXT) exists.
>
> http://dev.thep.lu.se/svndigest/browser/trunk/man/Makefile.am

This is an alternative solution which is used by GNU Hello too.  I
remember some people not being fond of this approach because of its
AM_MAINTAINER_MODE spirit [1].

[1] https://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/maintainer_002dmode.html

Thanks for your feedback.

-- 
Mathieu Lirzin
GPG: F2A3 8D7E EB2B 6640 5761  070D 0ADE E100 9460 4D37

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.