From unknown Tue Jun 24 22:37:50 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#31137: 27.0.50; `Info-find-node-2': Pass STRICT-CASE in last 2 `Info-find-node' calls? Resent-From: Drew Adams Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 18:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 31137 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 31137@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.15235568961689 (code B ref -1); Thu, 12 Apr 2018 18:15:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Apr 2018 18:14:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48361 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f6gkK-0000RB-C2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 14:14:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53501) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f6gkI-0000Qw-T6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 14:14:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f6gkC-0003Im-Up for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 14:14:49 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:44644) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f6gkC-0003IS-Qh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 14:14:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44442) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f6gkB-0002Uj-Ph for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 14:14:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f6gk7-0003D8-Qh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 14:14:47 -0400 Received: from userp2120.oracle.com ([156.151.31.85]:52726) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f6gk7-0003Ca-HP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 14:14:43 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (userp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w3CIC2U2140802 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 18:14:42 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : subject : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2017-10-26; bh=Oima0yeVxzqU1Q/hZ34RbvbB3ZnFDVDmJBdL0Yey9Cs=; b=cx/fAiw8VJse0x0XEStaf0CJcdFnV9W3mwW08ZS9ymSXu0rWSQ6C0UovjKatF6+LKIWJ AaFPBEIcouZ1bgnDJ8UukgZ5NG+ZuE116qesOcmTX9xs0LBgj/sGd5tFHTABl/IL8vKu SVCkL+aFrTHcU4Wnym+wSPSZQ+CtXGH1seL42mqHYB3X18uUHM0n153yzkZ4WT4aEe86 zEu5KJ4K+zCDmaoe9Bxs3j70Xnq0fIbVvGR8+188YcdxNM1UhDWDD2djWVejbQfQ6HWd eSapdsW03bqtsFXtE2aYg2goeboM637DmOif7vS9rfGxAEIjVuKb4A0vB+/pnkQEhRg/ UA== Received: from aserv0022.oracle.com (aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234]) by userp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2h6pn4wa07-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 18:14:42 +0000 Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by aserv0022.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w3CIEefb000593 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 18:14:41 GMT Received: from abhmp0011.oracle.com (abhmp0011.oracle.com [141.146.116.17]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w3CIEeZ5015948 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 18:14:40 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 11:14:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Drew Adams X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.4678.0 (x86)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=8861 signatures=668698 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=1 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=929 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1804120177 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) At the end of `Info-find-node-2' we see this in the second part of `unwind-protect': ;; If we did not finish finding the specified node, ;; go back to the previous one or to the Top node. (unless (or Info-current-node no-going-back) (if Info-history (let ((hist (car Info-history))) (setq Info-history (cdr Info-history)) (Info-find-node (nth 0 hist) (nth 1 hist) t) (goto-char (nth 2 hist))) (Info-find-node Info-current-file "Top" t))))) Shouldn't those calls to `Info-find-node' pass along the received value of arg STRICT-CASE? In GNU Emacs 27.0.50 (build 3, x86_64-w64-mingw32) of 2018-03-21 built on CIRROCUMULUS Repository revision: e70d0c9e66d7a8609450b2889869d16aeb0363b5 Windowing system distributor 'Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7601 Recent messages: For information about GNU Emacs and the GNU system, type C-h C-a. Read-Only mode enabled in current buffer Mark saved where search started Mark set Quit Quit Configured using: 'configure --without-dbus --host=3Dx86_64-w64-mingw32 --without-compress-install -C 'CFLAGS=3D-O2 -static -g3'' Configured features: XPM JPEG TIFF GIF PNG RSVG SOUND NOTIFY ACL GNUTLS LIBXML2 ZLIB TOOLKIT_SCROLL_BARS THREADS LCMS2 From unknown Tue Jun 24 22:37:50 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#31137: 27.0.50; `Info-find-node-2': Pass STRICT-CASE in last 2 `Info-find-node' calls? Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 18:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31137 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Drew Adams Cc: 31137@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Received: via spool by 31137-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31137.152355878912080 (code B ref 31137); Thu, 12 Apr 2018 18:47:01 +0000 Received: (at 31137) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Apr 2018 18:46:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48394 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f6hEq-00038m-QL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 14:46:28 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46118) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f6hEo-00038a-Np for 31137@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 14:46:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f6hEe-0005Hj-IG for 31137@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 14:46:21 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:43581) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f6hEe-0005Hd-FR; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 14:46:16 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1831 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1f6hEd-0006GH-Qp; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 14:46:16 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 21:46:29 +0300 Message-Id: <83efjk1cvu.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: (message from Drew Adams on Thu, 12 Apr 2018 11:14:37 -0700 (PDT)) References: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) > Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 11:14:37 -0700 (PDT) > From: Drew Adams > > ;; If we did not finish finding the specified node, > ;; go back to the previous one or to the Top node. > (unless (or Info-current-node no-going-back) > (if Info-history > (let ((hist (car Info-history))) > (setq Info-history (cdr Info-history)) > (Info-find-node (nth 0 hist) (nth 1 hist) t) > (goto-char (nth 2 hist))) > (Info-find-node Info-current-file "Top" t))))) > > Shouldn't those calls to `Info-find-node' pass along the > received value of arg STRICT-CASE? I don't think it matters, because in both calls the node names are exact. We actually might as well force the 4th arg to Info-find-node be t. From unknown Tue Jun 24 22:37:50 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#31137: 27.0.50; `Info-find-node-2': Pass STRICT-CASE in last 2 `Info-find-node' calls? Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 10:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31137 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 31137@debbugs.gnu.org, Drew Adams Received: via spool by 31137-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31137.161243423525696 (code B ref 31137); Thu, 04 Feb 2021 10:24:02 +0000 Received: (at 31137) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2021 10:23:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39799 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7bnm-0006gO-Q2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 05:23:55 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:55574) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7bnk-0006fw-S7 for 31137@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 05:23:53 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=QLoglPvU+1BiI/A7de1xlE1t0clvWWb09fXKCGbQPWQ=; b=S1cvpc1/c7MmQoioQHRJANPKqx OCxiYp0ZIKPf5b/RoelNTwz53xS5BwvwnXLZuo11EcUe0REOPoB5WHcZhBWc8Iww5PyaSGosmaj23 /hOZ44grFq/fVWHM0p4dp7rBPPtcuRbRggiQVLASB/6/DPQhMf1l/VkLDGO0AZyt9Ydw=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l7bna-0005iZ-CX; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 11:23:46 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <83efjk1cvu.fsf@gnu.org> X-Now-Playing: Nathan Fake's _#savefabric (6)_: "Laluna" Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 11:23:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83efjk1cvu.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 12 Apr 2018 21:46:29 +0300") Message-ID: <87y2g4rv0y.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I don't think it matters, because in both calls the node names are > exact. We actually might as well force the 4th arg to Info-find-node > be t. Makes sense. I've now made this change in Emacs 28. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: > I don't think it matters, because in both calls the node names are > exact. We actually might as well force the 4th arg to Info-find-node > be t. Makes sense. I've now made this change in Emacs 28. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 04 05:23:58 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2021 10:23:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39802 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7bnq-0006gd-2S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 05:23:58 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:55588) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7bnp-0006gD-4d for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 05:23:57 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=5RKs9WlADREFbVBQN/tIwQlIzkYKzcCqJeZCqlAuI+A=; b=OOOWGnfxP9Nplnoe297lM2z+K2 Tk8i0W1xkvUudqmtADoMeWrOC1z7z87Z4HrVsRuK12f+mCIUv0jLfAu98gVk/SqKvDpaCP+GUB2pS skDNXO9yKfPCdcyoDoJWRGJ3QqlzhswHUZn7CX13IqfrUJTPEjpzIhmd6JZ6Pm89mDOE=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l7bnh-0005ih-Er for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 11:23:51 +0100 Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 11:23:48 +0100 Message-Id: <87wnvorv0r.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #31137 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 31137 fixed close 31137 28.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 31137 fixed close 31137 28.1 quit