GNU bug report logs - #31132
AUCTeX, RefTeX and biblatex's multicite commands

Previous Next

Package: auctex;

Reported by: gusbrs.2016 <at> gmail.com

Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 06:06:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: gusbrs.2016 <at> gmail.com
Subject: bug#31132: closed (Re: bug#31132: AUCTeX, RefTeX and biblatex's
 multicite commands)
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 20:34:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#31132: AUCTeX, RefTeX and biblatex's multicite commands

which was filed against the auctex package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 31132 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
31132: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=31132
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>
To: gusbrs <gusbrs.2016 <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 31132-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#31132: AUCTeX, RefTeX and biblatex's multicite commands
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 22:33:11 +0200
gusbrs <gusbrs.2016 <at> gmail.com> writes:

> I think so too, this one is good to close. Once again, thank you very
> much!

You're welcome, and thank you for your support.  I think we will go on
with discussion about your proposals on auctex-devel.  For now, I'm
closing this report.

Best, Arash

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: gusbrs.2016 <at> gmail.com
To: bug-auctex <at> gnu.org
Subject: AUCTeX, RefTeX and biblatex's multicite commands
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 20:35:39 -0300
From TeX.SX: https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/425883/105447


RefTeX's relations biblatex's multicite commands (such as \parencites, 
\footcites, \textcites and so on) leave some things to be desired for. 
Namely, they do not seem to be recognized as citation commands. This 
results in RefTeX's `reftex-view-crossref` (C-c &) returning "Not on a 
crossref macro argument". Also, in adding an extra bibkey to an already 
existing multicite command, it is not possible to access RefTeX's 
facilities.

Arash Esbati generously provided patches at TeX.SX that go a long way in 
dealing with these problems. However, support for the presence of global 
optional arguments (between parentheses) is still missing. At their 
request, I write to report this issue.

So, I kindly request that this issue be addressed when opportune.


With my warmest thanks for the great software,

gusbrs




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 46 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.