From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 08 03:27:39 2018 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Apr 2018 07:27:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41842 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f54jj-0008Tj-1l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 03:27:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50520) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f54jh-0008TW-6H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 03:27:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f54jb-00072M-4R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 03:27:31 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:55475) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f54jb-00072G-0L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 03:27:31 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41472) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f54jZ-0002Rj-WF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 03:27:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f54jV-00070k-3G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 03:27:30 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:59503) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f54jU-00070T-Q2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 03:27:25 -0400 Received: from E15-2016.optimum.net ([108.6.168.221]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.184]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MAgzj-1fBzpB2edf-00BpPX for ; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 09:27:23 +0200 Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2018 03:27:19 -0400 From: Boruch Baum To: Emacs Bug Reporting Subject: 25.2: apropos-value: memory leak Message-ID: <20180408072719.nwauygxzigcxm6xk@E15-2016.optimum.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180223 X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:UjEDjlzsp4zAhoC+HEgh5kmhevYfnoltaPrfsJjeLRJCSRDZus1 rXnsE91sckaOIYDCn9TjqmWYUZkvuD2bDKDfMmCDOfLgWBsCdeUC/iRfgmxJwmtsXLyrZM+ bsdY2YWRBFbTvH5VZY7zi3AYYc0ki+QTHw9Fix1JbKs9X29vd5L1Cf7kxarVbCL6NkBoYQJ O2s3qZNT3wSG2XSzHzO/g== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:cJ53Op9pqGs=:/1WvbVhwxpZmr4KW8+XUPN r/MrwzFWW0DRHbOWEoU/dDhDYx1+Qjn0JkKdv2C9klSozkzV/GOZVUCGsqMBRn56jLyR7hufD qt+k4gECp9UrXqUNLilS/IFuGkj7UW2LpQUqFcncFjro35jdEgyIbusGXt/JcvUJVemd8vtm5 UD86pZ5M7EPL1u+0U50MuhSVbE1ecuwkzG+qiehzDnVPi5VFZb/bYAd2vtcX12SJ7oQelA7JM nlfCBJaocBIEErN7C/teMU+9+M8UJ3zAvWTdX2gaV4KwL2oCReya4ZbagrzpgBZVeCn/mCknr Kb19Nik633nsy9SS70Nu492vkpDLyRQ4aUszLilYcZZG6s81bcEVNhk1eKYWWfI50hrsA+p+a CCL95yp6/VRB9nNIUH6BjyC7TQWuaK6Gkv99GXrDTTkvfkbKnUk0gfueYoRjfgJq7mnBQpIud b72Q4raSQzOiA1aYe7HdBIg3bEE6Hg0l0i0op7GCVvzntvKCGjd0cIjQozDDNuvRhzlkQ6xtz 9cm1Jn/4tOe0TqLpKXS8erc+1W1qhkLsepHlTMQOjby4rQ9O4o6pZ4xJqGz/6to/sFiFKG1Wd 1mM/fF154S8ZGfF+KHstG3ZhwcshNd7OQ7/Vsn/rYcbmn5e1CBblksz48WQIykCb9GugngQ6j n5MwUcVA0wkSey82EMEcumoi2FASy5nqEgKoweufj5biLKwjPGeh1nSYkU9ZZOTm1v2cG7owL YtoIng06Swq8+tnhZ64nGqZ7yEX1gTw0WgTUL00WaWe9kgRvAClqB6RfdqJc8x0vMbfoPR6UE 394YP0dpcbRUvqH7k0OpZhRmFLTlA== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.1 (-----) In emacs version 25.2, in debian, I am reliably experiencing memory exhaustion condition within five repeats of calls to function `apropos-value'. In the course of a cursory attempt to see what might be causing this, I came across a curious global variable declaration `apropos-accumulator', which doesn't look to be the culprit, but should be converted to a locally scoped variable. -- hkp://keys.gnupg.net CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 08 03:58:14 2018 Received: (at 31092) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Apr 2018 07:58:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41863 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f55DJ-0000kb-Tf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 03:58:14 -0400 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:58376) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f55DH-0000kS-LW for 31092@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 03:58:12 -0400 Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40Jm5H0549z1qtG3; Sun, 8 Apr 2018 09:58:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40Jm5G69nJz1qs4j; Sun, 8 Apr 2018 09:58:10 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uEs3aVvDJo-Z; Sun, 8 Apr 2018 09:58:10 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: sF6nHcEV6Tf6f7pjT7I5L121uKIjgCRA0xAeZOsDTHWIyoh0zELM6gHE3l6e75X1 Received: from localhost (ppp-188-174-148-14.dynamic.mnet-online.de [188.174.148.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Sun, 8 Apr 2018 09:58:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DCD1C2C1139; Sun, 8 Apr 2018 09:58:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Schwab To: Boruch Baum Subject: Re: bug#31092: 25.2: apropos-value: memory leak References: <20180408072719.nwauygxzigcxm6xk@E15-2016.optimum.net> X-Yow: Xerox your lunch and file it under ``sex offenders!'' Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2018 09:58:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20180408072719.nwauygxzigcxm6xk@E15-2016.optimum.net> (Boruch Baum's message of "Sun, 8 Apr 2018 03:27:19 -0400") Message-ID: <87k1tif7u7.fsf@linux-m68k.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31092 Cc: 31092@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) On Apr 08 2018, Boruch Baum wrote: > In the course of a cursory attempt to see what might be causing this, I > came across a curious global variable declaration `apropos-accumulator', > which doesn't look to be the culprit, but should be converted to a > locally scoped variable. That wouldn't change the amount of garbage produced, though. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 08 04:04:14 2018 Received: (at 31092) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Apr 2018 08:04:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41871 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f55J7-0000uJ-Q6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 04:04:13 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:56723) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f55J6-0000u6-D5 for 31092@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 04:04:13 -0400 Received: from E15-2016.optimum.net ([108.6.168.221]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.184]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MCLx3-1fDe0i2rcf-0095ZN; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 10:04:06 +0200 Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2018 04:04:02 -0400 From: Boruch Baum To: Andreas Schwab Subject: Re: bug#31092: 25.2: apropos-value: memory leak Message-ID: <20180408080402.twb3o7h5h32gbgqx@E15-2016.optimum.net> References: <20180408072719.nwauygxzigcxm6xk@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87k1tif7u7.fsf@linux-m68k.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87k1tif7u7.fsf@linux-m68k.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180223 X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:E9BCUtKJECzd4BqcqRKsP2HFCl4NfaFrzckK3xVOEpcJVn0zAAC rcSZowRHv26KBMoqWHdJ0HhHsgc9fqWCFzXVE8psCrZ/6Q/7RFoM5nYsYrEtoscg0ZbamGU Or5bOuMXrJQaCmfkD5Jk5M6AOX6nOoscyVf8GAZB6d9exqzGHW2MogPkQzkMRhUid8QBcum xcdkQiRd/ICNwpr/vHtzg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:Xw21cGNHY20=:z2mRgx95zCB5Aj1w9UA2Do Iapf2QDMXXQaakxh7sMgQOlfMBNMLW/E3ETmwAPX1q23ruQMmiNgau2UXKpsjft83H5kcpk5s oP+WVJ5CYU1dMcUc8ZbhZ2hMGuzu26tH4Mdy5ibiPPNa/HuqraSN61QybLQx78LURBsFan34v dr0Nt+XDX5OuR7fk6dYI4GkHDXvdu0hxlCcVxTFDIbB7PE4EyUOpcoDKnjByXKzBt2ZQlhvBb wNRBE92lZqGqnoHrtF9UMoV+6scRv5Nb/BtiNrh/5xUZn0v6uA9pngJoXYkjQyop2/AHNWcA9 lWIpMqzfP6cyWwx9tH7BeGPCDc9MDAHJ5VeyWvtT3ehORamdC/e18IAxwviko3NOgajUS+0d7 M9XwQ9GU9T7LedpzE3e7duSSV8H1FnO5lwLPwyxhO5idv4eVVRcGVzt6NXClVsbAEB6wYsQNt 1oQdZ/D7UUpAe1Im6nKi0FNs9rNEUb99ckPCGqJAVLWxOGfjW4PBeEfPLWZPxs8IALFYv2mVQ b5vr0UtaGhPU1MezhgnhMbcQsb4FVDY3xbG8T1aK0xvFkSQAB6YuWKTMLnQ93He+K7CRmb0Lk Ll116BaXWRtrK9UormT6t9iTW0cSkqbCPNXdV7qUsLD5OfzX905DBo/kDau0A95vl0kjTnYuZ HdDSzrflrpAq1gG2wp77S5eNIqamSLOPbnl3bUPNqa9gg5Ll83Cu4S6L8ETx+xuRJSXpevKY2 Xh3XWoe/8ZRy1Nn1/OBnLhC39IXyRc7mGRvexJhFuU/X4c4smh3UMyBgOUUURI+CBCuXh6j/E YIssY9j726s66d5zdReBhHeXl9RBQ== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31092 Cc: 31092@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On 2018-04-08 09:58, Andreas Schwab wrote: > That wouldn't change the amount of garbage produced, though. Didn't I say that myself? -- hkp://keys.gnupg.net CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 08 08:38:33 2018 Received: (at 31092) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Apr 2018 12:38:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41987 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f59ab-0000ce-6G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 08:38:33 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f170.google.com ([209.85.223.170]:39959) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f59aY-0000cQ-8z for 31092@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 08:38:32 -0400 Received: by mail-io0-f170.google.com with SMTP id e79so6576166ioi.7 for <31092@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 05:38:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=T6l9I4/dJqhfk8V52mSsYYgUxljFFkU8Dr6wEf2qee0=; b=KUBlU8HlHknH1DhuRE2hYWNcpjEQ2N1nsKFo+U+OXUdksP+tEaxL09YxxgHgDJt26e nD9qQI6rOje5666GFU6iOX6uMOBFjWMpWlFjRuehLyObmlMEy7K34KelV4KRLpZHkyw3 RYiWh2TTGFsPcbFwV7i6toazDHH+8rtHkvUxDalqTIgVnRrr1KWU7BnBleuxDSrye6Rg kO1GJdvTiQVOVJ4RRS0JT6a9sq0B+mhxlPY1eyhtwQekyiJnN/qLlGMiKT5E93id9sUL D0Jh0vkhDi0r7dsUX89gOFBibU8xWl6/R/qCNviuf9LRC54L8rKbp9u77gmpdWavjQe/ 77LQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=T6l9I4/dJqhfk8V52mSsYYgUxljFFkU8Dr6wEf2qee0=; b=VM2LtUrVQnzbHqXP3L0sjHDMMs1CFqa39m6pAYSDdpm8ySdAk4gnu94/OZGQExv2tv TH6a/FUTAM8jt2O2Y9tx0WDQVIYQaAfAJpOMbpkMglPk/1thMkwJn5tNrfHtjkXlC3qd FLMiDOy8mOiFy7kzNCG8d7mLOsyxzG/NMQHIPxkoQrMlwdFmetirJM9NIKV8vI+7mdF6 ErWy0LAmKgTsiBPT8PwRxf6lPGt4n3z06yG7EyYbjgaN3I/9PAZem4aEmusvMf6eX/d3 WWT1XAwJZGSM+keKUIlsR6VD8VjzUaTgx26ikBlbJhlRjuPm3jFgGBTBI8YAg6TI6csS 7r4g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tBYEGYX3M7ORTPs/ZSOiL0xXILY7q9/g2b6e3XmryvsQbEaKqsG kiMXDuggF2iNICuMe0IOjUG76w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx48+YEc1pNAXkfJKSiP5k8lnVmarCHMPMynuVBZkpuFF3qhWViMLezx5UwGHvE0AUdptJP/4ww== X-Received: by 10.107.140.1 with SMTP id o1mr30704403iod.149.1523191104395; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 05:38:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zebian (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id k75sm8646486ioi.75.2018.04.08.05.38.23 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 08 Apr 2018 05:38:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Noam Postavsky To: Boruch Baum Subject: Re: bug#31092: 25.2: apropos-value: memory leak References: <20180408072719.nwauygxzigcxm6xk@E15-2016.optimum.net> Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2018 08:38:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20180408072719.nwauygxzigcxm6xk@E15-2016.optimum.net> (Boruch Baum's message of "Sun, 8 Apr 2018 03:27:19 -0400") Message-ID: <87woxhnaad.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31092 Cc: 31092@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Boruch Baum writes: > In emacs version 25.2, in debian, I am reliably experiencing memory > exhaustion condition within five repeats of calls to function > `apropos-value'. I think this another manifestation of Bug#26952 "repeated buffer insertion (e.g. yank-rectangle) consumes excessive memory (4GB+ for 90MB of text)". You can configure with REL_ALLOC=yes, or try Emacs 26. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 08 08:59:49 2018 Received: (at 31092) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Apr 2018 12:59:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42004 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f59vB-00016Q-NO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 08:59:49 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43062) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f59vA-00016E-5Q for 31092@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 08:59:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f59v3-0003dU-5p for 31092@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 08:59:43 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:33816) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f59v3-0003d5-2C; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 08:59:41 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3101 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1f59v1-0004t9-Dz; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 08:59:39 -0400 Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2018 15:59:41 +0300 Message-Id: <83o9itzwea.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Noam Postavsky In-reply-to: <87woxhnaad.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Noam Postavsky on Sun, 08 Apr 2018 08:38:02 -0400) Subject: Re: bug#31092: 25.2: apropos-value: memory leak References: <20180408072719.nwauygxzigcxm6xk@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87woxhnaad.fsf@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31092 Cc: boruch_baum@gmx.com, 31092@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) > From: Noam Postavsky > Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2018 08:38:02 -0400 > Cc: 31092@debbugs.gnu.org > > Boruch Baum writes: > > > In emacs version 25.2, in debian, I am reliably experiencing memory > > exhaustion condition within five repeats of calls to function > > `apropos-value'. > > I think this another manifestation of Bug#26952 Indeed, because I couldn't reproduce the problem on my system. I suggest to try the latest pretest of Emacs 26.1 or build the emacs-26 branch of the Emacs Git repository. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 08 09:35:13 2018 Received: (at 31092) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Apr 2018 13:35:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42032 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f5ATQ-0001w9-Pp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 09:35:12 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:38489) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f5ATO-0001vt-Lc for 31092@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 09:35:11 -0400 Received: from E15-2016.optimum.net ([108.6.168.221]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MCcE2-1fDRwg068Q-009Mmv; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 15:35:04 +0200 Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2018 09:34:58 -0400 From: Boruch Baum To: Noam Postavsky Subject: Re: bug#31092: 25.2: apropos-value: memory leak Message-ID: <20180408133458.wubi2zsupgcevbwr@E15-2016.optimum.net> References: <20180408072719.nwauygxzigcxm6xk@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87woxhnaad.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87woxhnaad.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180223 X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Q+SPB7xE6u+N/OwXVsNio4LCeC7EfAm18V7/QoSSYECDzPaYFPv 2KRe6n4j+zBNDNhLmwF6MQo2KHA3ZaVYQf6A+bBsHmKoaTFoc6bIv81ts5Ni1jSBdyFGEfP kTjxZ4a54tyL6JK/y1t7kx/QW1iHvBcQwr2VOH2/gGKJdfjCid31RP3Q8gUejx1BJZLNlPo zmd/MXcEYgdK2Dv0DzMfw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:HBM9hLzkFfs=:xFs/LKG7Vx+nv5HwEcwcez fQT0qCIgXdaDp7NPfA7pxblNVZR8rgd9HpuA9DE3GBGoS8JNgT5EcXcd39zESpqXqwq8eTBtI ItEGJt37yu6GtvuUhDsQVGP50zTX8hv3Ncy6aAQBoFGnvF0xtWfc4C5u7OL3IJUKqjU1k/uT8 Y49ahK+8DbcFUQAR2U07X2w7MDm5wlzjFucZMH53ZXX7G0cn8znJTjOgUtKdZXV6ycxSbxXk2 hZgleU95kU8TNxcOTIETmb9DULg8yqSKJQzgKvmLogYWD3nzVw/zc5i6eX63F3a9W3BsG39Nl 8GO1AUkxlfOGDtKfoq2JUiZGHRWvXtLV6YaSKiClFvMc0Tynjk7xN6A3YLlw+NsjOD7Qd5KIl 2hPwoIw5yJH5IUOxhT7xxufa++ay2rrZRtOFmgqhEVvnvpqqD65Y0bqwDaWYOT9tuupx4Z3Nh +LFWBj2WNnOjwdkXlSv6mW5PCAxjkVFbK+fJQ+JvHdvqs1qm0jQTu+a31pDchO2TCXLKM0apu qcqX9lokmT7KXkLypQFmNf1NJWhMWSGqPMbMvrUcOvzyPlbpIo2eZgG+oOCNcaLBDl9Td064m SOGONB2I7jr69/1S9viTnADdc47pXNehYGzhrHXaiD3U7d+0ZPoU6WrHemeWioHIw/H99YcwX dGN7to5eSg+Gjg28SUEgCABz/LRLbrTHzDs+9GZ6a9bxlMve4UGLjx8h0hxKr2G9tWdAfr59x Li4+qfZsN1CuL0WjvtVC5lSmLv74b2RBp7haPDeAFoJmaCRdkD3Mt2Lxp7qkU3IBUVyPJhH// bnyxngxVD+OeaGZlznvyJxGWYsGqA== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31092 Cc: 31092@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On 2018-04-08 08:38, Noam Postavsky wrote: > You can configure with REL_ALLOC=yes, or try Emacs 26. Call me coward (not lazy); I guess I'll wait for emacs26 to leave alpha state a distant memory and be packaged for debian. -- hkp://keys.gnupg.net CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 08 09:43:17 2018 Received: (at 31092) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Apr 2018 13:43:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42041 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f5AbE-00027N-Rv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 09:43:17 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:36083) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f5AbD-00027A-Dx for 31092@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 09:43:15 -0400 Received: from E15-2016.optimum.net ([108.6.168.221]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LtZfc-1eOVcu1q8i-010vP4; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 15:43:08 +0200 Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2018 09:43:04 -0400 From: Boruch Baum To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#31092: 25.2: apropos-value: memory leak Message-ID: <20180408134304.33i5cx7yscegvvfi@E15-2016.optimum.net> References: <20180408072719.nwauygxzigcxm6xk@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87woxhnaad.fsf@gmail.com> <83o9itzwea.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83o9itzwea.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180223 X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:j6uX4zbn5yWikbTCemKtJVjM1UeOWOiKie/F9/3CRPMbvz4k25k ZYJ9ZhvYxrNWPW/nvqC9mmQrj9FRfIfMysMDCx1vjwQjD7OPSnhNH8wF2xDyz69jg5nfLM5 ozEZQN9ZeAA3ipWkhNpeWMSjv/nGBoRl+bW7lpjHh0emFpIDRby5fyypfijN3RPT9pgew51 Sda1I3SLUD5oyTMyJy41Q== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:zCmd1HsJF4U=:CFju1aCf4bqO+qErDd/yiI oTXOG5HIrXVIy6fR4qV8NevF2Te4EOnFVWjlaUQlRvgAKiZuB1rm7Yr6GjZkNMkhsShOueEc2 u84Q0ZGePgAle9eBYZk+tnOUQH6L5pgfBayBB9MiOVtIjZ4xSXycpNYn2qwaLHm4xwQ5KTnNP 8nJGnhVp7Q9Gx8vlUiV9oXU+ouQtOn/NWyVjK6cFDTmpXPxgH3zqxNOv2BZzsXByhAwsW8KLt O3Hvv9wlumiZSacZBayebYudcGNUz8WFLumTXSWglT7LEINJ943qB2AWLnkTIks7gEuevga8I ulqNFAWpcDAPLLIM3c/GREMcGHoSI2PV+gdkbAN6/B79uqE1VQETTXUzfeUPaI7vyTcplbrKx Mj7mPsdcSSLrz4hFdzvcvIFkDfUfCj3v2bjs9E5bKcSj9sskv9ueRcR8KxfZjJjojLZJtUgO4 L4Nh9gRUR6lEwv5I+iIJOa9LM+2l+OfR9fkM0hM7TKe6w6E0lDAG3JoNNX0wfYmmRHnk7EAg/ jB00nCoWakiU2KuW3zM5wX7zoFJ039x7u3guTuBudlSpc9i1JTU2hM8EN4ZsD/CxUniqIncBx 1WxZZ4pZi6R5ecTIz090oIuVTOUPfdrC9qgrNGTOk3OkKVIRXHPK1G1RRUWb9RZ9QbS6Rl7ZP VOjkFgvh2DLodOTSlJAdvSUBJc5WxYQ+eXqPD0/YpMR3YcrvmCv7l65MrWBzP5E8rYUphYLGt vgHFU4pEPwNX8jdBFTaqDrZWntkghfdPxM8P7LaCp69CKk1oumQ3Hl449F2f+pu9doTaN7ieo baNoRfk9fPGn/ZmLh3gl0LwqRTJVQ== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31092 Cc: Noam Postavsky , 31092@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On 2018-04-08 15:59, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Indeed, because I couldn't reproduce the problem on my system. > > I suggest to try the latest pretest of Emacs 26.1 or build the > emacs-26 branch of the Emacs Git repository. Too much the coward for either option. BTW, at line 1154 of the file apropos.el is a brief comment "permit gc", which might indicate that this was a known issue at some point. The way that package uses variable `apropos-accumulator' seems all wrong, creating it as a global and then manually unsetting it; seems to me it should be locally scoped and passed as an argument when necessary. -- hkp://keys.gnupg.net CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 08 10:01:12 2018 Received: (at 31092) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Apr 2018 14:01:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42607 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f5Asa-0002gS-0o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 10:01:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44584) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f5AsY-0002gF-UY for 31092@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 10:01:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f5AsQ-0000vT-Jj for 31092@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 10:01:05 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:34544) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f5AsQ-0000v7-G4; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 10:01:02 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3232 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1f5AsP-0001bF-8Y; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 10:01:02 -0400 Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2018 17:01:03 +0300 Message-Id: <83d0z9ztk0.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Boruch Baum In-reply-to: <20180408133458.wubi2zsupgcevbwr@E15-2016.optimum.net> (message from Boruch Baum on Sun, 8 Apr 2018 09:34:58 -0400) Subject: Re: bug#31092: 25.2: apropos-value: memory leak References: <20180408072719.nwauygxzigcxm6xk@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87woxhnaad.fsf@gmail.com> <20180408133458.wubi2zsupgcevbwr@E15-2016.optimum.net> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31092 Cc: npostavs@gmail.com, 31092@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) > Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2018 09:34:58 -0400 > From: Boruch Baum > Cc: 31092@debbugs.gnu.org > > On 2018-04-08 08:38, Noam Postavsky wrote: > > You can configure with REL_ALLOC=yes, or try Emacs 26. > > Call me coward (not lazy); I guess I'll wait for emacs26 to leave alpha > state a distant memory and be packaged for debian. Emacs 26 has left alpha state long ago, we expect RC1 in a day or two. And I expect you to be able to find it packaged for Debian already. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 08 10:23:39 2018 Received: (at 31092) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Apr 2018 14:23:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42625 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f5BEH-0003C6-IL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 10:23:39 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:45513) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f5BEF-0003Bt-Gj for 31092@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 10:23:36 -0400 Received: from E15-2016.optimum.net ([108.6.168.221]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lx5hl-1ePqyf29rF-016jaZ; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 16:23:28 +0200 Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2018 10:23:25 -0400 From: Boruch Baum To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#31092: 25.2: apropos-value: memory leak Message-ID: <20180408142325.ejufyzge2zhmkgyg@E15-2016.optimum.net> References: <20180408072719.nwauygxzigcxm6xk@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87woxhnaad.fsf@gmail.com> <20180408133458.wubi2zsupgcevbwr@E15-2016.optimum.net> <83d0z9ztk0.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83d0z9ztk0.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180223 X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:9ejetqmkXiRw9cIy1zHHd7CzWgYUy7pKZ8A8CeRhno4UVy0MHuk 3n6q6PSeyl44UQEhvjqE+uF0rD0rHTfnnGeURl2BjqcQw438blfafKh45rxQt6zT/ntKBlV J7jAgMuAwitjR9Tbctaqgq7DHWyV7B6isTr8yIRi62eSuloZQWoXqxqF+ORDRBLKTo+O3FJ eS320jLzl4CjT+OX+L33w== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:Qsfr04sSgKM=:Bzz36DZ5Yz+7CM+WcXYZKg Lk6h9pXFXv7QunpJ0lmAA79XT0FRhcEXT6MeX5U0tpQ0XfvABOCqgw8ST/ZLX+39uRqRPsikM 7W6B66+EoAdl2k1nIybaFr5Eo4eQfIZWmTRnVCv/yhqEib/3FpKINZCFRWfjgkXnA5baWIL/u b/B0mZXIYRbmMqhIbYHIuErYi1vMYsI75be9o1quYMVt/DDzVFgSMqNBiZbUIUUDu4J9LAC40 sebBa6/583GPzCS9GWmecjWBCC2/1zUqE4bN0Mmt+0z/JCQFS4fU5yeA6YOgZa7rP9bUNm7re T3qbeCcQqLai5oA8oiyXMfZB/isVK2/MJq/juTpfDywL7bikjoXNSz6VEur0OiV11o2GjZ/Z1 PbodgrlemH7cIBihTRR6J6TctkQjNWMiMz3d7rkLX1+ya81A3zXCO0nnfUJPpom0CzyA18JJ+ K/7zG5/mgJUz6owQrjMGHIgKmP9EPdtZGWaisO+ROGKzztSyB//29fgEj/0FjeokKXvBiH188 7sxi4m4f/ve8iKtlRe7O1dqpoE0W4jYCRrvWTZmkzUbk6pH3g1wl7whu5yO1mjbiWn0LRCoQ9 AVGUn0KkaqbIO8rDSIrurDbNQEbKtzsa0DfIxlVQNxkwnBcUDl0p3Zj7o0h55+ZFqv/wyBlvH ZNZHt3b+EvewSxFHD9Hk6GIaS4l3E9JXxtKL3k8dZ9HWKmgqYhhQvzyqhCCn6+Y7EQBVxfx6P ih6QBeF5U/qYOZZ4Omqrk1IFn55MauzPqtWi5yeP4O/0zRxNYDbsRiK1O35PmhdHr4oeEjNfY NwbBJT7PQt2xBFDgeAQWwFgZY9TPw== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31092 Cc: npostavs@gmail.com, 31092@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On 2018-04-08 17:01, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Emacs 26 has left alpha state long ago, we expect RC1 in a day or two. Hooray & congratulations! > And I expect you to be able to find it packaged for Debian already. I looked before I posted and didn't see it in the official debian repositories. Looking a second time... Still don't see it. Not even in the 'experimental' repository. Give them time. When it shows up in 'unstable' I'll notice. I'm looking forward to it! -- hkp://keys.gnupg.net CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 09 08:01:23 2018 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Apr 2018 12:01:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43205 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f5VUB-0000i2-3O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 08:01:23 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f44.google.com ([209.85.214.44]:51460) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f5VUA-0000hp-1r for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 08:01:22 -0400 Received: by mail-it0-f44.google.com with SMTP id b5-v6so10623491itj.1 for ; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 05:01:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=tpyWziWUoVnUTUUf/g02/ow+uzJCe3Equ2c5YWwpdZk=; b=J9Xc2J0Vo/NC0ti+BuZgFS59hictAqc7iXt9OXveL4Q3QdusSNwBkiHvcPZTNezvf8 qJeZcnbRRBqGAnS6H7W1/LxI4PLZRg25OmEazN/nnr/BseEcZ1CPyrmiQ6ybk68/A7D3 6MxcULu6dotu4F/DVEcj3uupA4yjSkCmecvF2t+QN8MRxl8aYVL/cwJYjOmxQCiKrBE/ yte3KccFKHn4PIsof9FgSjd7Zwcl6l2qbsjxQNeXONXXzqmcLLQ3as2jJ9tbP8Y293HT Dgt2//Nv06jHg02T+SiBKmsrMiChIRgEX8R+21lyR+He9dcJJZTKgNMBDpB0cyNH3RYr b/Sw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=tpyWziWUoVnUTUUf/g02/ow+uzJCe3Equ2c5YWwpdZk=; b=GdDgobqsGkgL7EzXp8BeyKJbqnXjOISnZvml5T9BVnfK2kQ1S+YYTSM0Wagep1lOb0 1e6ZX35trhkyJpemevpgXipgwNPhGpePGHtMabZ1I+otw0OcfUjefLAutMhcIbMejkJZ pHDJD6I0M5rc8O0RTp/KHX5AaNJdoAXfzqrUdeD2ojN3r6WYJN37TdNBj/lSans00ip1 H7h45Rzg6duFD6ulxpf61CPLNFTWqe0Azw97GLM2nwYx6Zp6qQwErYLkfkIfIVa81pBH gypiJu7UtHQxkvdG3DE36Dktop1de3eQ6/9N4ZsWthRGZ4bOSbNNU+/yw1cPJhK6ZDa/ Lzjg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tAe6+UBvOXDNe2lAYLZqkm4vHovlLj49PEi4WANe8zCqWB1GMNG 5GMkt86aJ5UtPLSzzT/fyyf++w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx48ef1NAHYGOm87Tg4H71kzmMNdE/N2jO1hfRMpC8h1v5KSHUwZOkswaEWYFJyWZqHfz/aYMrw== X-Received: by 2002:a24:45a2:: with SMTP id c34-v6mr29968929itd.31.1523275276512; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 05:01:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zebian (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id k197-v6sm70323itk.13.2018.04.09.05.01.15 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 09 Apr 2018 05:01:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Noam Postavsky To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: control message for bug #26952 Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 08:01:15 -0400 Message-ID: <874lkkmvw4.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) unarchive 26952 forcemerge 26952 31092 quit From unknown Sun Jun 22 03:57:41 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 17 08:14:08 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2019 13:14:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40845 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ihCfw-00008b-JJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 08:14:08 -0500 Received: from mail-qv1-f47.google.com ([209.85.219.47]:40651) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ihCfv-00008C-7H; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 08:14:07 -0500 Received: by mail-qv1-f47.google.com with SMTP id dp13so458630qvb.7; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 05:14:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=NN0secEnzDDLDW7GNv7tsD4hcIif5QNUn8j7DAlrboc=; b=gdotjuEPDdUJix/0+rsUtXDRARSVzLqSmpCPm7j3wUyMs/67x72kyfSclqAw+L13Uv vH/mCBpCHoW+oGn0wQbdJFKgwk7rmd4ohJ+fgAKlkJchOmGZRzTGeTlTNipUCB65fMPa LnXXnC40yymTMS+1k504clV/t1QO8XBoPeMP4jJRN3kYZ/LER40QKbwQUuLQIYx5mw+S aqtDINccUdUkjxC4QoA+5UI3wyE9PrJ4JZObNXvhX+x8pIpAnmbyaHuoA8b61hcGpOQY CUlGwu1fWZSFavKYJE4QoeUeLN3/+prLzTBWiwCcjjDNg37lFn9qP1ENBvan7GM/vgzw nfbg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=NN0secEnzDDLDW7GNv7tsD4hcIif5QNUn8j7DAlrboc=; b=OIbDB0IZzUxOYphBZ+wRz5LHmLV+QN8BzDcpyG5TKDTTDLTvr4H/nSySUInUCESF0x KOiOu38Bwe2IfvFT1kHDVdA76AFF1aTtXKUCiuG6JGJAs05grFGptiCXRBbS2AbbQu3R lqOsTmoFKIL/wVqX94+l+fN9SZI3XhWL8DDrTvai4aZPWqWTuhEx8Ryqs2jq1jwkVaUj 2Ad6DEoMTXutyLI8ixvVtVDN5+jB1FBqg80brAs78fsOUMbhV1i8MV3spDoMpn2Iher5 gT+BiUsDd6AS9ryniHFMi6CB+pYy8SqgK2igbo00G6NxSZnL1N4qzrL4Yu1T8KI7hgaI zgGg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVoSkX9lvLI1CIXKSlRWyfZGW/lLd/b4gvl7bRdxSNtLClTLFqE KhW/dWFinqLqIqf9wrp2Co+vjxlU X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzFlKnYN+ipeYXd4UzHXl2rTJ/DtdWsDJOEbjKIwc+qtxBrzIYUfCR7p+xEFrIvyqPHmryp2Q== X-Received: by 2002:ad4:478b:: with SMTP id z11mr4459154qvy.185.1576588441674; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 05:14:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from minid (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s26sm7109791qkj.24.2019.12.17.05.14.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 17 Dec 2019 05:14:00 -0800 (PST) From: Noam Postavsky To: Peter Ludemann Subject: Re: bug#38629: 25.2; garbage-collect doesn't reclaim large *compilation* References: <87a77scprp.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 08:14:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Peter Ludemann's message of "Mon, 16 Dec 2019 16:19:44 -0800") Message-ID: <877e2vccx3.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control Cc: 38629@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) unarchive 26952 forcemerge 26952 38629 quit Peter Ludemann writes: > The sluggishness is not related to the *compilation* window, so we can > close this bug (as fixed by emacs 26.3) and I'll open a new bug report. Thanks for checking. From unknown Sun Jun 22 03:57:41 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 12:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator