From unknown Mon Jun 23 13:09:06 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#31086 <31086@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#31086 <31086@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: [PATCH] xref: Make xref-push-marker-stack interactive Reply-To: bug#31086 <31086@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 20:09:06 +0000 retitle 31086 [PATCH] xref: Make xref-push-marker-stack interactive reassign 31086 emacs submitter 31086 George Kadianakis severity 31086 wishlist tag 31086 patch wontfix thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Apr 07 04:46:56 2018 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Apr 2018 08:46:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40801 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f4jUt-0004Nd-6n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Apr 2018 04:46:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48523) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f4bMr-0007Qo-9O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2018 20:06:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f4bMl-0004H6-5Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2018 20:06:00 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:45846) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f4bMl-0004Gz-1u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2018 20:05:59 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39484) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f4bMj-0000Vr-OW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2018 20:05:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f4bMe-0004Fd-QI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2018 20:05:57 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:33583) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f4bMe-0004F0-HJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2018 20:05:52 -0400 Received: from piha.riseup.net (piha-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.163]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C27DB1A088C for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 17:05:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1523059550; bh=SXQFxtb8Eh5E+YI9D/iap9ctfBv0svjnEuijzLujsgw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=Pe6mf1LrdmBxZ8nWvV2/X8PYYMbFTrHC284211havthAkFburClUZi37mDfMQJhxV oqdG7IrFx9CyOHk0F8wpOVsRUxcfoPz6xYzsrh9xBSlXVdKrm7zeVXawOMHssuL5Un /ahD77lDrnXYefELuIpwuk7ExTrVOzU+uZSej9Ko= X-Riseup-User-ID: 64807AFC411E479D02721ED155D70952CA1AB724899D11723257F5F9FA8CDEE2 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by piha.riseup.net with ESMTPSA id AF37321DE3 for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 17:05:49 -0700 (PDT) From: George Kadianakis To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: [PATCH] xref: Make xref-push-marker-stack interactive Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2018 03:05:45 +0300 Message-ID: <87h8onvq1y.fsf@riseup.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 07 Apr 2018 04:46:53 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.1 (-----) Greetings emacs wizards, here is a small patch that allows xref users to push markers to the stack without using xref-find-definitions. This allows users to mark arbitrary positions in the code that they consider interesting (e.g. documentation) even tho it's not actually an xref definition. Let me know if you don't like it! :) Have a good one! --- >From 9ddda3d1724b9a40e7e9a0c413b883abc4aeab33 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: George Kadianakis Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 21:42:51 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Make xref-push-marker-stack interactive You can now call 'xref-push-marker-stack' interactively to push the current point to the xref marker stack. This can be used to mark interesting places that you want to visit later using 'xref-pop-marker-stack'. * lisp/progmodes/xref.el (xref-push-marker-stack): Make function interactive. --- etc/NEWS | 6 ++++++ lisp/progmodes/xref.el | 7 ++++++- 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/etc/NEWS b/etc/NEWS index 02b31ecff4..db6122d901 100644 --- a/etc/NEWS +++ b/etc/NEWS @@ -345,6 +345,12 @@ when the PGP keyring contains a public key for every recipient. To achieve this, add 'message-add-encrypt-tag-if-can-encrypt' to 'message-send-hook'. +** Xref +++++ +*** You can now call 'xref-push-marker-stack' interactively to push +the current point to the xref marker stack. This can be used to mark +interesting places that you want to visit later using 'xref-pop-marker-stack'. + * New Modes and Packages in Emacs 27.1 +++ diff --git a/lisp/progmodes/xref.el b/lisp/progmodes/xref.el index 5a9a7a925a..5c70005d13 100644 --- a/lisp/progmodes/xref.el +++ b/lisp/progmodes/xref.el @@ -352,9 +352,14 @@ xref-after-return-hook (defvar xref--marker-ring (make-ring xref-marker-ring-length) "Ring of markers to implement the marker stack.") +;;;###autoload (defun xref-push-marker-stack (&optional m) "Add point M (defaults to `point-marker') to the marker stack." - (ring-insert xref--marker-ring (or m (point-marker)))) + (interactive) + (ring-insert xref--marker-ring (or m (point-marker))) + ; If called interactively, output a message for the user + (when (called-interactively-p 'any) + (message "xref marker set for current position."))) ;;;###autoload (defun xref-pop-marker-stack () -- 2.16.2 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Apr 11 03:28:28 2018 Received: (at 31086) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Apr 2018 07:28:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45659 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f6ABA-0000Ps-DR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 03:28:28 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48]:51869) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f6AB8-0000Pf-LD for 31086@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 03:28:26 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f48.google.com with SMTP id u189so1995986wmd.1 for <31086@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:28:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DKbJRbzFbpGhdu8RE/+rhl/CxQ4/IpyFI5W6uoYzgII=; b=PWPNp/fwLXz21xzPbpc05YvCXnjSf8Mr/t8lWyScRBkqR6ZxCm0TaINAo+AId95Sdp 82JcQRQt/8ITyLCWyPObdUvDVLbguaq1cUL/aOgtVUTmLyez1ZRSMTMPU/63I1U4kkHi zEW/N4aVT0ga1/hggZXKV4dvQpAHJ3IwuLdRRJMNNj3zPJBk5QM9fnq0d3VP8LR/yTH1 gbVEUDCW0N8eTvC9EHHp9oPVyBH380Xprrho2YtjFSWaF0UyVIvfhCUrD5rh5a8lRs23 uO7sYyBjCEu2zM+Mo/sBsdyNWq1IY+xb4cYEfGYsze0vaAXXQZY/gG2Jtj4sXklHfgXY O+Iw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=DKbJRbzFbpGhdu8RE/+rhl/CxQ4/IpyFI5W6uoYzgII=; b=i9bi5BYW5SnKCn+7V0sTcSGeHY5Q/+TZLADeox/U8zmgZUcng2gpQhsQbPz6bVtCbJ C8RmB2ppsgibZmhRCsP89+h1hCeAcNjzAthL5cwj5ChId9/rwHtVw2lvZLdCNGGPeQVQ fjvJXxb0ZXhXPg7HVNw4GBSIm8aDWyfWypZpnUVA5SKY7Wj809kq/Zr6K7hdiWtxkAnw QnsNHm3QM+uCzcIIsFPGSbrwx5Cq/4Wyrndg5EpI46EgD0IKR39WWxDO1MUhD2OZVn9g QJp6q39yKla8VTM2t+h0s9LMocZ9t4+EJzrN5XVgsJblBv4KBZMOQUf1sloeXDnIg8LW l5qg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tDhkoatQyjgfaKtWrwWt+nll2oFSvpDnYH3nboefvENjgurn7hA Xun/4r8TWDBiqAnj5gpBATELmPBZ X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+A1A1eaHdaBALy1/Sj0wYvupJ+zbhny2AW1OPXfHJEwzZH6YjG9VuuhMgUFHVfkmVuFSEefw== X-Received: by 10.80.129.167 with SMTP id 36mr7823545ede.13.1523431700435; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:28:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([185.105.174.23]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id q10sm588259eda.2.2018.04.11.00.28.18 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:28:19 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: bug#31086: [PATCH] xref: Make xref-push-marker-stack interactive To: George Kadianakis , 31086@debbugs.gnu.org References: <87h8onvq1y.fsf@riseup.net> From: Dmitry Gutov Message-ID: <03a652db-35e5-2064-fdc8-79b74a0aaa74@yandex.ru> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 10:28:17 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87h8onvq1y.fsf@riseup.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31086 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) Hey! On 4/7/18 3:05 AM, George Kadianakis wrote: > here is a small patch that allows xref users to push markers to the > stack without using xref-find-definitions. This allows users to mark > arbitrary positions in the code that they consider interesting > (e.g. documentation) even tho it's not actually an xref definition. Thank you for the patch, but I'm not quite sure we want this behavior, at least not until we have a common marker stack for many different operations. But let's hear what others think. In the meantime, it should be easy for you to use advice, or define a command in your init file that would call xref-push-marker-stack. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Apr 16 20:24:02 2018 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Apr 2018 00:24:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56480 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f8EPi-0003JE-Jm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 20:24:02 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f48.google.com ([209.85.214.48]:55643) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f8EPh-0003Ij-FV for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 20:24:01 -0400 Received: by mail-it0-f48.google.com with SMTP id 145-v6so7806482itf.5 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 17:24:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=VTHAOTVdK2+P4TaSYk9Ji3/FebUOvdO0png9HpLdT3Y=; b=oizBhRHgZnvDqui7KQQ5MBz2YHoBBi2r9b7lNEyd+CvwE1E2Z9UOSukxOWZTbubAo4 7qzN39efBQq1PgxnI7WxzmbCLNztOswkjUizFy9ts/HrSiWzM4hgERw6YKzwPJhLTD7Q c0tiuRNh6P2RpT7YHgoSGsACvY/hBt2HvOzvZ7fZm3jcNZIewrYXevkHXA5UuK3RjiMx U8ly4jn50g5cTl/nws/jSFU5NRiat/oCCdPhEtJh/IkzcxQQsCURcrhSLyAls8W5Z3p7 FBLW5U0D86cuKtRFDj1wYa6zDIanMKkaYf0hwMnMU3eQMZTlzbvHH5dQyDUTZj/Plo+g rJ0g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=VTHAOTVdK2+P4TaSYk9Ji3/FebUOvdO0png9HpLdT3Y=; b=tUONLvcHdYAyxcF//FQrMMNRidbzZFXEQDuOC0BbqQhVW2lzj5V7f3nwcKSEO3cH1N KzNSM7XYtAw02Bo77iKKS5RM+iCJzrRyZPgbWGqovb+a5tkvWgGyIuNO9KDyAUjPA7dD lPZHQQ10LY2nSVTmQaqeqnVjh+QlGKT1xJxR0t9KKR9WpygR3Yhom634EgP8D9aVx5Ev XgmlB7Wfo6yKAdPKlI2LLFvkfzMaF6cevAyJp2oI0yJUMRS88y8nbwTCj3oaKqY/6AL+ ndRDBZ8i8443uoILfg9f/8FV5mmJQhZikJcmG4192OhY3luOkwQiWNp8iF5C2nD/ppoz 20jQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tBmJK3+Z4R1GfL6ehMittnbcH9QILtic48walVoSBD3dHN0y5Da +aLhn8Im2/xOzIQ3K2ZB8OyAQg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx48EKU6CMIEkmtUTE3Qdtjr2x6XvHaen+F5XYyxnZaMzng2hW9jATTPY+jQB2hKqP7HpjOqAWg== X-Received: by 2002:a24:ed8b:: with SMTP id r133-v6mr402626ith.110.1523924635818; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 17:23:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zebian (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id l22-v6sm5141590ita.25.2018.04.16.17.23.53 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 16 Apr 2018 17:23:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Noam Postavsky To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: control message for bug #31086 Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 20:23:52 -0400 Message-ID: <8736zuvfxj.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) severity 31086 wishlist quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 24 11:26:03 2019 Received: (at 31086) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2019 15:26:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57608 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfQr5-0006sH-8o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 11:26:03 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:60094) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfQr2-0006rp-Op for 31086@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 11:26:01 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hfQqz-0004kT-BB; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 17:25:59 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Dmitry Gutov Subject: Re: bug#31086: [PATCH] xref: Make xref-push-marker-stack interactive References: <87h8onvq1y.fsf@riseup.net> <03a652db-35e5-2064-fdc8-79b74a0aaa74@yandex.ru> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 17:25:57 +0200 In-Reply-To: <03a652db-35e5-2064-fdc8-79b74a0aaa74@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Wed, 11 Apr 2018 10:28:17 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Dmitry Gutov writes: > On 4/7/18 3:05 AM, George Kadianakis wrote: > >> here is a small patch that allows xref users to push markers to the >> stack without using xref-find-definitions. This allows users to mark >> arbitr [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31086 Cc: George Kadianakis , 31086@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Dmitry Gutov writes: > On 4/7/18 3:05 AM, George Kadianakis wrote: > >> here is a small patch that allows xref users to push markers to the >> stack without using xref-find-definitions. This allows users to mark >> arbitrary positions in the code that they consider interesting >> (e.g. documentation) even tho it's not actually an xref definition. > > Thank you for the patch, but I'm not quite sure we want this behavior, > at least not until we have a common marker stack for many different > operations. But let's hear what others think. It didn't sound like anybody else had an opinion here... Dmitry, do you still think that this is probably something we don't want? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 24 19:30:07 2019 Received: (at 31086) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2019 23:30:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58362 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfYPW-0006W2-TJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 19:30:07 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f46.google.com ([209.85.128.46]:50621) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfYPT-0006Uc-1c for 31086@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 19:30:03 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f46.google.com with SMTP id c66so937735wmf.0 for <31086@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:30:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hlQZ7AdzC/xUC18scU6hCcdk8GANhVCDu/DKG/7lunY=; b=oJI0FucICU3rLLydPPuVsSYOS+pzjnUvrkgzyXhfDhLGeSRHezDjEGb9exgnBbJ0tz v4bYhbO2soEGufLNMwzZgGxC4rJAFgc0LVTncieAjQdMAIdM3IlHNz0EOHfuqJ1kIAyS N+dxo8Mi+NVgyPumXpxZU4wPv6Skt5DAQ13qy2p59WMhaeOQnGAcD7QwAuHmyPWkkzxH N2k8nqfb8v70qCzcWnuWjisMlMwveAkBMZg+LOClxkwEJCEwBAwNWa5hlI0BH6MwWvbT p0hremed+6/AgrCRTqrhbT3lINffisIlF3xdJ5HyHh4bmjh0y/yRfZ2+/4Pma/dXqYGJ s6ZQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hlQZ7AdzC/xUC18scU6hCcdk8GANhVCDu/DKG/7lunY=; b=OUUbco/SNONXHLHbBBQw1wFznvJjquuJid9WoZlePTANa5teiWmC77LWD7oWylDLpo ZlfRIW9/ny27kPNNPaEsaefsf3WBMueP3xqkublLTPRMhTw2cF3xLilc6n9+QaW0WQBF 17kvHuCM9PQqbkwb6x9zWpw5Pi+kUGnds5l11MyDrfEhiH9MhPZqGZmO8V0LCJC7VjQu dt2cPo7kXuKf25LhKOj32r9TZW+8W4SlFTwqr7y69EC7gWNU/y1qpNnvNw5hUH+XHaxb Hvm0gPuzofhFXrjHoke2vF8q8LlYuSYMfLEIaM4KjIP3/9KT3lSfenk8UpuNnB7kF5IJ B5sw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXBe3V+r9yXhNdwrRxvDly91A7mXZZAoA+Cfs/oALBxIwaLMX/C lD51D1GzL9ik11tLk8Os4O39JPVV42Y= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx5bMXafSezHlowTWcTWDJIxVKlcKKC5MSZP+kQLhrvCNjHXstTzOQ1BAmo/BSjwWuHxGDpdg== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:ce10:: with SMTP id m16mr17114733wmc.21.1561418996653; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:29:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([185.105.174.23]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id d5sm11169603wrc.17.2019.06.24.16.29.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:29:55 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: bug#31086: [PATCH] xref: Make xref-push-marker-stack interactive To: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <87h8onvq1y.fsf@riseup.net> <03a652db-35e5-2064-fdc8-79b74a0aaa74@yandex.ru> From: Dmitry Gutov Message-ID: <840675d6-1967-299e-28f0-1c5e5912a2ad@yandex.ru> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 02:29:54 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31086 Cc: George Kadianakis , 31086@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) Hi Lars, On 24.06.2019 18:25, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > It didn't sound like anybody else had an opinion here... Dmitry, do you > still think that this is probably something we don't want? Still not convinced, no. It's a customization that is easy to set up in a personal init script, so unless we see similar requests, I'd rather hold off installing it in the core. It's not a strong opinion, though. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 25 03:53:19 2019 Received: (at 31086) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2019 07:53:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58580 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfgGU-0006cd-Su for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 03:53:19 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:33626) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfgGT-0006cS-08 for 31086@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 03:53:17 -0400 Received: from capuchin.riseup.net (capuchin-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 355B21B9318; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:53:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1561449195; bh=Op40k98slPSXBJOP72UqLzdDwG39PjLNeBgT1qfolOE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=b+i5tONX1ZSKD/e8/k6Nl2VpQu/rEuR3ElKtfnIwDSXKoinNgBZ842Cd1/69lE8tK w3NvU/S33m14AauEr8RBqTvETRC8XG9svEnSGaPe7Rm/3Q5ZglIx0Vyzdf5b06HnRm 9EMAbH2jMnxBTuHIC7UxHhYHF41ByXNA6eOMxLCo= X-Riseup-User-ID: 34873489FB6D25FBD0F9DB366396FDE31FD06721EBEC7797E08F60CE358173D8 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by capuchin.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D80F71203E5; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:53:11 -0700 (PDT) From: George Kadianakis To: Dmitry Gutov , Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#31086: [PATCH] xref: Make xref-push-marker-stack interactive In-Reply-To: <840675d6-1967-299e-28f0-1c5e5912a2ad@yandex.ru> References: <87h8onvq1y.fsf@riseup.net> <03a652db-35e5-2064-fdc8-79b74a0aaa74@yandex.ru> <840675d6-1967-299e-28f0-1c5e5912a2ad@yandex.ru> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:53:07 +0300 Message-ID: <87wohat82k.fsf@riseup.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31086 Cc: 31086@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Dmitry Gutov writes: > Hi Lars, > > On 24.06.2019 18:25, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > >> It didn't sound like anybody else had an opinion here... Dmitry, do you >> still think that this is probably something we don't want? > > Still not convinced, no. It's a customization that is easy to set up in > a personal init script, so unless we see similar requests, I'd rather > hold off installing it in the core. > > It's not a strong opinion, though. Makes sense to me. For me, this was just an ugly hack and perhaps the xref subsystem is not meant to do this sort of interactive stuff. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 25 07:06:07 2019 Received: (at 31086) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2019 11:06:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58719 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfjH5-0000sW-5j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 07:06:07 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:46894) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfjH2-0000sN-GP for 31086@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 07:06:06 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hfjGz-0007Bp-4N; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 13:06:03 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Dmitry Gutov Subject: Re: bug#31086: [PATCH] xref: Make xref-push-marker-stack interactive References: <87h8onvq1y.fsf@riseup.net> <03a652db-35e5-2064-fdc8-79b74a0aaa74@yandex.ru> <840675d6-1967-299e-28f0-1c5e5912a2ad@yandex.ru> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAMFBMVEVqhlq8HEWOwMzqJzbx JDbnITb4+DtnYFi6GS+/LkGpFTKDCUjkD3+EP1uBqoLTHj/f+5OGAAACV0lEQVQ4jV3TTWgTURAA 4AeC0YtQ8OhpL6EgvWSR2nqRzvbXEIQs+IMUWtlzscpShV7s4WU9JGigTUE8NIclFy+WSJ4/CN4S D0ohgiyIl9DLnhq6TQ9x5r39S+a28+28mXnZsIlrHRnfYSTmWAy5UWFhvtMRYNSdfsMZnLkzpVIC 38SOcVjm7nngOM5gkEBbfFCHjx/VFjsAhttwpl+WnZKT7qEjHATO9Ec3GNSAdZLmGCcGQA6MJe36 GMhYfvBL01LwecK7qmA3O5UGz/N+SshrWqrCI/DkwFoM7U8/PAVFKvgn4RbBYd5LKvL2EwL9Du5W Lyg4UkDCdFgUog5578/G5T6EgML05dYsAsxdtKx1Ca8RthEW9VnxFWDewnishlUA8Ko1A3DDkpHL 0UwhnNNthGBZNomCFYL5GOS0EgpjEO6BSXmxKQj3wEVSsNZLYKUFSXdNy8bwUH4GqsmaRhJV1OVt U37dpomyCgrd51Up9C125Rpqql3sdhD93t1wDYQlms+uJoD3QVA8lbCZAupzzO6zjBRdwe2uhEnO KgwDH56GJXdRtKk9zlgIW5CI9ps7LJYwb5r3mpNBDJkYDHM14DwGFoFpmsMhQiOCzFZUYAZY0YiB bZ55VQnD8ijQYEU6ig5yEniLkD2BIp5EHSJ4Awu2aNpH2AFnwvcRarVa5QLAQla8EM9wplUeQr9I n/7NSk/YzXfYQXYmCN5j/pSxnmhu+P7xkEcwcPFPytiVXlNs+75/iXNXHcXLJuAN+70vNub9v6pD o8V433zECOh9jH2ZF+I/QIbz8E4uSaIAAAAASUVORK5CYII= Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 13:06:00 +0200 In-Reply-To: <840675d6-1967-299e-28f0-1c5e5912a2ad@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Tue, 25 Jun 2019 02:29:54 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Dmitry Gutov writes: > Hi Lars, > > On 24.06.2019 18:25, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > >> It didn't sound like anybody else had an opinion here... Dmitry, do you >> still think that this is probably something we don't want? [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31086 Cc: George Kadianakis , 31086@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Dmitry Gutov writes: > Hi Lars, > > On 24.06.2019 18:25, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > >> It didn't sound like anybody else had an opinion here... Dmitry, do you >> still think that this is probably something we don't want? > > Still not convinced, no. It's a customization that is easy to set up > in a personal init script, so unless we see similar requests, I'd > rather hold off installing it in the core. OK; closing the bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 25 07:06:19 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2019 11:06:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58722 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfjHH-0000sz-HA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 07:06:19 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:46910) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfjHF-0000sp-AO for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 07:06:17 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hfjHC-0007C4-Q7 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 13:06:16 +0200 Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 13:06:14 +0200 Message-Id: To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #31086 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 31086 wontfix close 31086 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 31086 wontfix close 31086 quit From unknown Mon Jun 23 13:09:06 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:24:12 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator