GNU bug report logs -
#31025
[core-updates] LLVM 6.0
Previous Next
Reported by: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 16:48:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #8 received at 31025 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello!
Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com> skribis:
> This is an update for LLVM and Clang. I haven't yet found a package
> that actually works with this new version; the consumers I've tested
> does not support LLVM >4.
>
> However they can keep using the old version, and if there turns out to
> be a problem with 6.0 we can fix it later since there are no dependents.
Sounds good!
> From 28e48a152c99c4c0911c794dd449c4df5ed193f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2018 22:04:44 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: llvm, clang: Update to 6.0.0.
>
> * gnu/packages/llvm.scm (llvm, clang-runtime, clang): Update to 6.0.0.
> (clang-from-llvm)(patches): Set to empty list.
> [arguments]: Set CLANG_RESOURCE_DIR in #:configure-flags. Adjust
> substitutions depending on major version.
> (llvm-3.8, clang-runtime-3.8, clang-3.8): New public variables.
> (clang-3.7, clang-3.6, clang-3.5)(patches): Add 'clang-3.5-libc-search-path.patch'.
> (clang-3.9.1)(patches): Add 'clang-3.8-libc-search-path.patch'.
> * gnu/packages/patches/clang-6.0-libc-search-path.patch: New file.
> * gnu/packages/patches/clang-libc-search-path.patch: Rename to ...
> * gnu/packages/patches/clang-3.5-libc-search-path.patch: ... this.
> * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Adjust accordingly.
>
> Add CLANG_RESOURCE_DIR (not sure if needed).
Hmm?
Otherwise LGTM!
Does this change the derivation of ‘llvm’ proper? If not, this could
even go to ‘master’.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
This bug report was last modified 7 years and 49 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.