GNU bug report logs - #30873
[PATCH core-updates 0/3] glibc 2.27

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>

Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 10:22:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
Cc: 30873 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#30873] [PATCH core-updates 1/3] gnu: glibc: Update to 2.27.
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 14:18:05 +0100
Hello!

Thanks for working on this update!  Crazy that it turned out to be this
difficult.

Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com> skribis:

> +++ b/gnu/packages/patches/glibc-2.27-git-fixes.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,12765 @@
> +This patch includes all post-release fixes for version 2.27 up to commit
> +3b922526415d1af93fe5a0e3caf7e6a790cb1619.
> +
> +https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release/2.27/master
> +
> +Generated by "git diff glibc-2.27..release/2.27/master".

In general I’d be in favor of not doing that, unless the fixes are
important (build issue, security issue, etc.), as was the case when we
packaged 2.26; and, if there are important fixes, I’d rather extract
them from the whole patch stream, and skip unrelated changes.

For example, I’m sure we can live without the locale updates that show
up in this patch set.  :-)

Do you know which of these patches are really needed?

Thoughts?

Ludo’.




This bug report was last modified 7 years and 60 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.