GNU bug report logs - #30828
Icedtea updates

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#30828: closed (Icedtea updates)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 14:57:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Fri, 16 Mar 2018 10:56:39 -0400
with message-id <20180316145639.GA10885 <at> jasmine.lan>
and subject line Re: [bug#30828] Icedtea updates
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #30828,
regarding Icedtea updates
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
30828: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=30828
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Cc: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>,
 Gábor Boskovits <boskovits <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Icedtea updates
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 14:34:59 -0400

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

These patches update Icedtea 2 and 3 (Java 7 and 8, respectively).

Usually I push these without review after making sure they build, but I
noticed a lot of Java-related activity lately, so I'm sending them in
for review.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
Cc: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>,
 Gábor Boskovits <boskovits <at> gmail.com>,
 30828-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#30828] Icedtea updates
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 10:56:39 -0400

[Message part 6 (text/plain, inline)]

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 03:11:31PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name> writes:
> 
> > These patches update Icedtea 2 and 3 (Java 7 and 8, respectively).
> >
> > Usually I push these without review after making sure they build, but I
> > noticed a lot of Java-related activity lately, so I'm sending them in
> > for review.
> 
> LGTM.  I think as long as you've verified that some of the dependents
> build, it should be safe to push such simple updates regardless.

Alright :) Pushed 1d97d8ffd8531696b1a651419aa9e106b09bb615

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.