GNU bug report logs - #30815
26.0.91; unicode right single quote mark with syntax entry of w not respected by forward-word

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Aaron Jensen <aaronjensen <at> gmail.com>

Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:16:01 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: confirmed, notabug

Merged with 10494, 13129

Found in versions 24.0.92, 24.1, 25.1, 26.0.91

Done: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 30815 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, aaronjensen <at> gmail.com
Subject: bug#30815: 26.0.91; unicode right single quote mark with syntax entry of w not respected by forward-word
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 17:59:49 +0200
> From: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 22:24:46 -0400
> Cc: 30815 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> diff --git a/src/syntax.c b/src/syntax.c
> index 378064611c..d3dd79229a 100644
> --- a/src/syntax.c
> +++ b/src/syntax.c
> @@ -1555,7 +1555,8 @@ DEFUN ("forward-word", Fforward_word, Sforward_word, 0, 1, "^p",
>  table, but `find-word-boundary-function-table', such as set up
>  by `subword-mode', can change that.  If a Lisp program needs to
>  move by words determined strictly by the syntax table, it should
> -use `forward-word-strictly' instead.  */)
> +use `forward-word-strictly' instead.  See Info node `(elisp) Word
> +Motion' for details.  */)

I think we should at least mention char-script-table before sending
the reader to the manual.  Currently we mention the syntax table, but
keep complete silence regarding the script differences.

Thanks.




This bug report was last modified 7 years and 66 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.