GNU bug report logs - #30815
26.0.91; unicode right single quote mark with syntax entry of w not respected by forward-word

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Aaron Jensen <aaronjensen <at> gmail.com>

Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:16:01 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: confirmed, notabug

Merged with 10494, 13129

Found in versions 24.0.92, 24.1, 25.1, 26.0.91

Done: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Aaron Jensen <aaronjensen <at> gmail.com>
To: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 30815 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#30815: 26.0.91; unicode right single quote mark with syntax entry of w not respected by forward-word
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 19:43:03 -0700
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 7:24 PM, Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> I think leaving the whole picture to the manual makes more sense.

Works for me. I think that patch will help. Would it be worth updating
`backward-word' as well, it has essentially the same docstring.

> Well, just taking the syntax entry as the sole source of truth and
> ignoring the character script is probably the wrong thing.

Is the case for this when two words of different scripts are next to
each other? I suppose that'd make sense if they also didn't have a
space between them for some reason (probably possible with some
languages)

> Maybe there is some other way to get the wanted behaviour though.  I
> also found Bug#13129 asking about this.

Since the right quote is part of the General Punctuation script
(afaict), what if some scripts, like that one, were treated neutrally?
That is, they derived their behavior solely from the syntax entry.
This is probably a bad idea for a number of reasons I don't even know
I don't know.




This bug report was last modified 7 years and 66 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.