GNU bug report logs - #30768
Gettext : test-copy-file-1.sh fail if --with-store-dir=/var/tmp/xxxxx/gnu/store

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: YOANN P <yoann_mac_donald <at> hotmail.com>

Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 17:49:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: wontfix

Done: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #23 received at 30768 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: YOANN P <yoann_mac_donald <at> hotmail.com>
Cc: "30768 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <30768 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#30768: Gettext : test-copy-file-1.sh fail if
 --with-store-dir=/var/tmp/xxxxx/gnu/store
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 10:33:51 +0100
Hello,

YOANN P <yoann_mac_donald <at> hotmail.com> skribis:

>>YOANN P <yoann_mac_donald <at> hotmail.com> skribis:

[...]

>>> Even if i was aware of it after reading Pjotrp notes, i've never found a 
>>> clear limit after my readings on the web. If Guix Team has an idea of 
>>> the store path limit lenght, it could be a great idea to add it to the docs 
>>> or did i missed it ?
>>
>>From m4/guix.m4:
>>
>>--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>>dnl 'BINPRM_BUF_SIZE' constant in Linux (we leave room for the trailing zero.)
>>dnl The Hurd has a limit of about a page (see exec/hashexec.c.)
>>m4_define([LINUX_HASH_BANG_LIMIT], 127)
>>
>>dnl Hardcoded 'sun_path' length in <sys/un.h>.
>>m4_define([SOCKET_FILE_NAME_LIMIT], 108)
>>--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>
>
> Hum, i'm not sure this part of code answer my question :)
> Are we agreed than LINUX_HASH_BANG_LIMIT is the max number of char for a 
> shebang and SOCKET_FILE_NAME_LIMIT is only the limit for the socket file name ?

Yes.

> What i was asking is the maximum lenght for the store path regarding the fact 
> (if i am not wrong) than a shebang inside guix is compose like this :

The only limit here is PATH_MAX.

>>Are you in a situation where user namespaces are unavailable?  HPC?
>
> Not at all, i was just playing with Guix to see if it can fulfill my long desires to have 
> an easy unprivileged portable environment due to old habits to intervene into some 
> hostiles environments in my previous job.

Then I strongly recommend using it as documented, i.e., using /gnu/store
as the store and running guix-daemon as root.

You can’t really get around it:

  https://guix-hpc.bordeaux.inria.fr/blog/2017/09/reproducibility-and-root-privileges/

Thanks,
Ludo’.




This bug report was last modified 7 years and 64 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.