From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:41:57 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#30569: Packages count as installed twice Resent-From: Andreas Enge Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 19:07:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 30569 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 30569@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.151923997329185 (code B ref -1); Wed, 21 Feb 2018 19:07:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2018 19:06:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54763 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eoZiX-0007af-0N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:06:13 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59507) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eoZiV-0007aO-S9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:06:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoZiO-0008FI-HV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:06:06 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:52772) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoZiO-0008F2-6J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:06:04 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50390) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoZiM-0002Wh-2m for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:06:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoZiI-00088K-3X for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:06:01 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:36810) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoZiH-000861-Ms for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:05:57 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FE7E109E7; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 20:05:55 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UBWPbmu7blpk; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 20:05:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from jurong (unknown [147.210.21.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9DDD0DC6C; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 20:05:54 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 20:05:53 +0100 From: Andreas Enge Message-ID: <20180221190553.GA5485@jurong> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Hello, trying to upgrade my packages, I notice something curious: $ ./pre-inst-env guix package -n -u The following packages would be upgraded: ... gnutls 3.5.13 -> 3.5.13 /gnu/store/1ah3fd12w6v66q6yjdmd39xbisqi0gpw-gnutls-3.5.13 gnutls 3.5.13 -> 3.5.13 /gnu/store/1ah3fd12w6v66q6yjdmd39xbisqi0gpw-gnutls-3.5.13 ... There is twice the exactly same package! $ ./pre-inst-env guix package -I gnutls gnutls 3.5.13 out /gnu/store/g09is0bw144d8zrd059fiarqmjq7vr8a-gnutls-3.5.13 gnutls 3.5.13 out /gnu/store/g09is0bw144d8zrd059fiarqmjq7vr8a-gnutls-3.5.13 This looks like a bug to me... Andreas From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:41:57 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#30569: Packages count as installed twice Resent-From: Ricardo Wurmus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 19:54:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30569 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Andreas Enge Cc: 30569@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 30569-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B30569.15192427851730 (code B ref 30569); Wed, 21 Feb 2018 19:54:01 +0000 Received: (at 30569) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2018 19:53:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54917 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eoaRs-0000Rq-Ln for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:53:04 -0500 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21012) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eoaRo-0000RP-Tt for 30569@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:53:01 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1519242752; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; l=779; bh=o1DCkPNDZ4AE0EBipvU4RLuVNbYT6lEdEOyNtjw+8to=; b=EQKXETGzk3qy/URxOpNVHRnoiuFgGuLGHeViaVQ8RsQ8RT4DVNbzL4RswDxMKpm8 VGvU9iQqWdSYm0Q5B04K8QOmSH4ObZX63VCNJdNMwz/IAE6nYgROtR91Iy5E+DMJJuj 5TspYeNAprfBcxiq6DUpwQ3vchqwOTXiThlLeuzQ= Received: from localhost (port-92-200-5-116.dynamic.qsc.de [92.200.5.116]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1519242751945174.52131893360786; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:52:31 -0800 (PST) References: <20180221190553.GA5485@jurong> User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 25.3.1 From: Ricardo Wurmus In-reply-to: <20180221190553.GA5485@jurong> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 20:52:28 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <87d10yqfwj.fsf@elephly.net> X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Hi Andreas, > trying to upgrade my packages, I notice something curious: > > $ ./pre-inst-env guix package -n -u > The following packages would be upgraded: > ... > gnutls=093.5.13 -> 3.5.13=09/gnu/store/1ah3fd12w6v66q6yjdmd39xbisqi0gp= w-gnutls-3.5.13 > gnutls=093.5.13 -> 3.5.13=09/gnu/store/1ah3fd12w6v66q6yjdmd39xbisqi0gp= w-gnutls-3.5.13 > ... Does the package appear twice in the profile=E2=80=99s =E2=80=9Cmanifest=E2= =80=9D file (e.g. ~/.guix-profile/manifest)? I=E2=80=99m not sure how it could have ended up there, but one possibility = might be that you had two different versions of gnutls and they have both been upgraded to the latest version. -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:41:57 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#30569: Packages count as installed twice Resent-From: Andreas Enge Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 21:35:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30569 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: 30569@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 30569-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B30569.151924889918751 (code B ref 30569); Wed, 21 Feb 2018 21:35:01 +0000 Received: (at 30569) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2018 21:34:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54973 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eoc2U-0004sM-V6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 16:34:59 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:42694) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eoc2T-0004sE-3g for 30569@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 16:34:57 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id F155011B42; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 22:34:55 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mh0o92s32Rou; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 22:34:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from jurong (unknown [IPv6:2001:910:103f:0:2d09:8018:be35:9702]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 43F2C11B2E; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 22:34:55 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 22:34:53 +0100 From: Andreas Enge Message-ID: <20180221213453.GA5024@jurong> References: <20180221190553.GA5485@jurong> <87d10yqfwj.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87d10yqfwj.fsf@elephly.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21) X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Hello, On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 08:52:28PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Does the package appear twice in the profile’s “manifest” file > (e.g. ~/.guix-profile/manifest)? no, I am not using a manifest and do things by hand all the time. > I’m not sure how it could have ended up there, but one possibility might > be that you had two different versions of gnutls and they have both been > upgraded to the latest version. This is a plausible explanation. I ended up running this command: $ ./pre-inst-env guix package -r gnutls -i gnutls guile: warning: failed to install locale warning: failed to install locale: Invalid argument guix package: warning: Consider running 'guix pull' followed by 'guix package -u' to get up-to-date packages and security updates. The following packages will be removed: gnutls 3.5.13 /gnu/store/g09is0bw144d8zrd059fiarqmjq7vr8a-gnutls-3.5.13 gnutls 3.5.13 /gnu/store/g09is0bw144d8zrd059fiarqmjq7vr8a-gnutls-3.5.13 The following package will be upgraded: gnutls 3.5.13 -> 3.5.13 /gnu/store/g09is0bw144d8zrd059fiarqmjq7vr8a-gnutls-3.5.13 Then I ended up with only one listed. Anyway, I do not think it did any harm, but it could indicate a bug somewhere in the code. Andreas From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:41:57 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#30569: Packages count as installed twice Resent-From: Ricardo Wurmus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 22:15:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30569 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Andreas Enge Cc: 30569@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 30569-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B30569.151925129122472 (code B ref 30569); Wed, 21 Feb 2018 22:15:01 +0000 Received: (at 30569) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2018 22:14:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55002 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eocf3-0005qM-OX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:14:49 -0500 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21137) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eocf0-0005qA-SE for 30569@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:14:47 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1519251264; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; l=730; bh=PfvoGGdYuu9WC6thZEpRlVie7Ck87gshSLJlheC53Bw=; b=CkWSIM/OZzOcGxVDhr62c3CK706Qzl4TSQrxbi8E7M6X6rEWNxaUbHJaiux8l1WU b9vAndf7A1/d8IpDq2uEzlt/txyxycyLLaM9J6iuAVnFWcj+PXp0FQrD7T9i++KSb8Q QMu60IYFGK/yekXK2xcpdVORQ+g9bAKmT0fx7CRw= Received: from localhost (port-92-200-5-116.dynamic.qsc.de [92.200.5.116]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1519251264526761.7262696559982; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:14:24 -0800 (PST) References: <20180221190553.GA5485@jurong> <87d10yqfwj.fsf@elephly.net> <20180221213453.GA5024@jurong> User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 25.3.1 From: Ricardo Wurmus In-reply-to: <20180221213453.GA5024@jurong> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 23:14:21 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <87bmgiq9c2.fsf@elephly.net> X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Andreas Enge writes: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 08:52:28PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> Does the package appear twice in the profile=E2=80=99s =E2=80=9Cmanifest= =E2=80=9D file >> (e.g. ~/.guix-profile/manifest)? > > no, I am not using a manifest and do things by hand all the time. Even so, you=E2=80=99ll have a file called =E2=80=9Cmanifest=E2=80=9D in th= e profile directory. This is unrelated to whether you used a manifest to create the profile or not. (This is the second naming conflict in Guix. The other is =E2=80=9Cservice= s=E2=80=9D for system services and shepherd services.) --=20 Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:41:57 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#30569: Packages count as installed twice Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 22:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30569 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Andreas Enge Cc: Ricardo Wurmus , 30569@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 30569-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B30569.151925130422542 (code B ref 30569); Wed, 21 Feb 2018 22:16:02 +0000 Received: (at 30569) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2018 22:15:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55008 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eocfG-0005rU-PC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:15:04 -0500 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:50659) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eocfE-0005qh-Uj for 30569@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:15:01 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F03720DF6; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:15:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:15:00 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= mesmtp; bh=7Sbq1b3KD/UqKZvdz6xheshQ18iFwA6JFtfEE6t121o=; b=QFvUB b5jZqPivhvNGQSSAW0NLDv3nLmvLzU5BN4cuprUkQzjgVUK+9Tdi1OJ5jEwfMlnI aV6xLj9C2jGze8g3bbL8wynAYXpm2ohJavxeVDI4dCTBpYP0wc2Hp4TLhNvG8JSX ByLt6Kv+6a0WdALXI62Goa0bMih/v55I7voduU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=7Sbq1b3KD/UqKZvdz6xheshQ18iFw A6JFtfEE6t121o=; b=KNyLVXEMd3KZJQNCf/cs0rBkEzit3VbgdgJv+5o6YtAxt heajcaPgnF9Cs9ZhyM+jTMseOHUfkFewGzvmVnK55byq0yU55/FgHFUzKpJfQv3H SL4WvJY8AAg82kzLoh274TP89vE9ZJRi0LswPIDQDz6nGOBMYjmWbp02gtnfQp/I cTYeWkA/YrLs/6jVfZyjso+kPRr/HDz52tGMuE7EIZ4GZ5aK5cdpK6D9hm9A3oYz e1+1BpBsdKPznSWH3AmDmff9GVSaMhTSGbszV42dU0gWCTfc18fepxYbn7f9mjHq TgGbQnJMGVri+PIyKEM+HUlG822B3T/6JmcfnZSHQ== X-ME-Sender: Received: from localhost (c-76-124-202-137.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [76.124.202.137]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id F37DC7E4BC; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:14:59 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:14:58 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20180221221458.GA18507@jasmine.lan> References: <20180221190553.GA5485@jurong> <87d10yqfwj.fsf@elephly.net> <20180221213453.GA5024@jurong> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180221213453.GA5024@jurong> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:34:53PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote: > $ ./pre-inst-env guix package -r gnutls -i gnutls > guile: warning: failed to install locale > warning: failed to install locale: Invalid argument > guix package: warning: Consider running 'guix pull' followed by > 'guix package -u' to get up-to-date packages and security updates. >=20 > The following packages will be removed: > gnutls 3.5.13 /gnu/store/g09is0bw144d8zrd059fiarqmjq7vr8a-gnutls-3.5.13 > gnutls 3.5.13 /gnu/store/g09is0bw144d8zrd059fiarqmjq7vr8a-gnutls-3.5.13 >=20 > The following package will be upgraded: > gnutls 3.5.13 -> 3.5.13 /gnu/store/g09is0bw144d8zrd059fiarqmjq7vr8a-gn= utls-3.5.13 It would be interesting to see the profile history. Was the second gnutls introduced after the first one, or were they introduced together? --k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlqN718ACgkQJkb6MLrK fwiMlBAArBLRLC/2wPLyWi8ZgBx1B6AgAcSNwngLEfWmtP2c1YpD8Rf2Q4i65E1r ckk0ThRk2fReCfOWE/FhaJaHY0slCcg/Wwm6SRi1NR0i0GG80k7EjvAXv2ixCDYq j7NEeWeLNuc3v17K2PhhK6F5yWBqnXcErnuEjm98jdLG+a3+l0NhRnD+Q9W7dXeM pDEa6qtikm9ottKGOAaPuQO3A1XVlmtVN6JwawzPwxLfHgsa9w+/ko2sVzsaXeH4 7gyVlzpxh7CqRjfRnfRjKPE7b1T9IfR94gn+uts9Txe+HupHS10oGp+ihRhxR9lJ va0KH6usI6VET+VXp5r75nZQ/3OVVsFqWAYNAmBswDWkPnl3yyb6mqh8nYdFFOP5 Gn2wL17cPVX///iLddUqLcT9Ip2a2FAuRcwKHEU2PbLEngfkvhfrMYeQbMsN/oL0 J4A8MgU/UcrHyDbmBqZuVXkrvyZWEFYUsb+ORlEmuNySh+sefri6kfuvSRWjjP3B UyhmJlgkCUFZiaRWgrhwhRa/RPHzJ2Sfh7//fzkFesBY2LVIg9gecDrtbfsDyEZ1 0mHKDZkmFXoJ1ulprDikcz8YIJLZ2cMqiWsxRI2t5IdlaNVxpHJo1BXeeKJG2yIj JX837QK5wxS0G3pR5nmYNO4Dt5riG9lXHaGel+DPcbWwE/wflFA= =fXsb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G-- From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:41:57 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#30569: Packages count as installed twice Resent-From: Andreas Enge Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 22:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30569 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: 30569@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 30569-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B30569.151925176323312 (code B ref 30569); Wed, 21 Feb 2018 22:23:02 +0000 Received: (at 30569) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2018 22:22:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55021 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eocmf-00063u-Gh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:22:43 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:43092) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eocmd-00063j-IZ for 30569@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:22:39 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E44211B46; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 23:22:39 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y1RdtzLccO0q; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 23:22:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from jurong (unknown [IPv6:2001:910:103f::c1e]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 595E2119A1; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 23:22:38 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 23:22:36 +0100 From: Andreas Enge Message-ID: <20180221222236.GA5529@jurong> References: <20180221190553.GA5485@jurong> <87d10yqfwj.fsf@elephly.net> <20180221213453.GA5024@jurong> <87bmgiq9c2.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87bmgiq9c2.fsf@elephly.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21) X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:14:21PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Even so, you’ll have a file called “manifest” in the profile directory. > This is unrelated to whether you used a manifest to create the profile > or not. I see! Yes, it appeared twice. On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 05:14:58PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > It would be interesting to see the profile history. Was the second > gnutls introduced after the first one, or were they introduced together? Unfortunately I cannot tell any more. I only kept the last ten profiles, and all of the corresponding manifest entries contain two copies of the same gnutls. Once both of them were updated. Andreas From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:41:57 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#30569: Packages count as installed twice Resent-From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 21:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30569 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Andreas Enge Cc: Ricardo Wurmus , 30569@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 30569-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B30569.15197685106188 (code B ref 30569); Tue, 27 Feb 2018 21:56:02 +0000 Received: (at 30569) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2018 21:55:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36063 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eqnDJ-0001bk-Ra for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 16:55:10 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:55180) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eqnDI-0001bc-3r for 30569@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 16:55:08 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E0B10CBE; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 22:55:07 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mQQsuqe24Di6; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 22:55:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from ribbon (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E1401025C; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 22:55:06 +0100 (CET) From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <20180221190553.GA5485@jurong> <87d10yqfwj.fsf@elephly.net> <20180221213453.GA5024@jurong> <87bmgiq9c2.fsf@elephly.net> <20180221222236.GA5529@jurong> Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 22:55:05 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20180221222236.GA5529@jurong> (Andreas Enge's message of "Wed, 21 Feb 2018 23:22:36 +0100") Message-ID: <87zi3uumh2.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Andreas Enge skribis: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:14:21PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> Even so, you=E2=80=99ll have a file called =E2=80=9Cmanifest=E2=80=9D in= the profile directory. >> This is unrelated to whether you used a manifest to create the profile >> or not. > > I see! Yes, it appeared twice. Looking more closely, it=E2=80=99s actually possible even now to create a profile with the exact same entry twice: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix package -p foo -i gnutls gnutls La jenaj pakoj estos instalataj: gnutls 3.5.13 /gnu/store/g09is0bw144d8zrd059fiarqmjq7vr8a-gnutls-3.5.13 gnutls 3.5.13 /gnu/store/g09is0bw144d8zrd059fiarqmjq7vr8a-gnutls-3.5.13 substitute: updating list of substitutes from 'https://berlin.guixsd.org'..= . 100.0% substitute: updating list of substitutes from 'https://mirror.hydra.gnu.org= '... 100.0% La jenaj derivoj estos konstruataj: /gnu/store/viykf0jcxc9c51yl0p1023b75khad7jn-profile.drv /gnu/store/yi996sf93p8n15ijf27hcck1b6prywrl-info-dir.drv /gnu/store/ki7jrd29isi0l1zk93vrqd1p4by08nw7-fonts-dir.drv /gnu/store/0xkp49578vpjc7q96kyg052v4jhx439m-ca-certificate-bundle.drv /gnu/store/yxbrnjbxjcdx6nvs8l0wm8236mvx14l7-manual-database.drv Creating manual page database... 144 entries processed in 0.1 s pakoj 2 en profilo La jenaj medi-variablaj difinoj povos esti necesaj: export PATH=3D"foo/bin${PATH:+:}$PATH" --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Weird, but no big deal since they are really the same entry. (What=E2=80=99s *not* permitted is installing several =E2=80=9Cgnutls=E2=80= =9D packages having a different store file name. See =E2=80=98check-for-collisions=E2=80=99 in (= guix profiles).) What should we do? Status quo? Throwing a =E2=80=98delete-duplicates=E2= =80=99 call? Let=E2=80=99s have a poll! ;-) Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 27 16:58:40 2018 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2018 21:58:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36076 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eqnGi-0001hD-6E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 16:58:40 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:55208) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eqnGg-0001h6-Ui for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 16:58:39 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2239C11FE5 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 22:58:38 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LfRiBh2p1oeg for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 22:58:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from ribbon (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 681461025C for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 22:58:37 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 22:58:36 +0100 Message-Id: <87sh9mumb7.fsf@gnu.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: control message for bug #30569 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) retitle 30569 Profile can contain the exact same entry several times From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:41:57 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#30569: Packages count as installed twice Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 07:51:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30569 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Andreas Enge , 30569@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 30569-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B30569.151980425117689 (code B ref 30569); Wed, 28 Feb 2018 07:51:01 +0000 Received: (at 30569) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2018 07:50:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36391 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eqwVn-0004bE-9j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 02:50:51 -0500 Received: from mail-io0-f171.google.com ([209.85.223.171]:40237) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eqwVk-0004b0-Hb for 30569@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 02:50:49 -0500 Received: by mail-io0-f171.google.com with SMTP id v6so2212636iog.7 for <30569@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 23:50:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fBWczF5vQef1V9im/3LTbkfEtoO7tzl35ziByevZi0g=; b=F5sIiMUWbatSwU8+V7rnxBbIf2/1zif40DVD9vPDcML0kMLNpYbRq9lO+d1DLhxC14 2We4pWVd4GnOs2IBeU3NdzWTb1tPLLgcrTQMYyebaU4lvttapZWa0dY5GoMeCgwchIzD sS6U1tJn8GbM1ji+p2mde8UrAT5QUZZQVKCvpJAnpUDSzTcs+FfCSLr4uF7ce/WSiqFM SG9wE1s+5Fgqv+kvrytj21WoyONsk8rPGeV5hrISw2h+9H3fFOB2+47e0QI003gmcNa3 f6lMQE38NgCSKbndc5+GHYbGvuBHxAnnnop1mVITOyn9o+qvTwy2NwUVS06n9deSAXpo Cliw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fBWczF5vQef1V9im/3LTbkfEtoO7tzl35ziByevZi0g=; b=tpxl4fxdyxJh07rt55deSIggHqh32aHwZznxHY+LgExJNVsVfzgINxD7xwy6NyKioF p87Df5pfWzRMGblBWchxtXsF2GEefwfIqKRxbKJUP3o41F+tVyP6YFu8c3FbpJHyx5lF x5NdAlKIQ+jTGH2d/lupP68jC/PXhljpvvjm+A04ORZZygPd3SLP+ba9qMDJobNRHyX3 2sHWG61JnCZgq683sW9PQ6r7jT+v11akkhc+z5zzt17+z/5U3cq1QHqFEPCMwjzWLxNU 8A90q1+5F/A3mUVKuqKIDet4R0ZGu6tpcmBCABPtjwZW3/XJ13ETHp7Vgnj4eLY0HblF fjbg== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPBd/DouogyqTiM9sors+P+5XDIzFXciNKOKy/8bLN+ybHNFL1fb 9k4wXyZ8I7nIRM7H2h6JSfUFmA9zKkeu1x0orQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELu6upv0/F8rVFLK3DOsGA3GYlcvwDsNnf7V/bMck5vBNDtJQ7PJ2hL8dSzKaeB7yY6aaRbQ4TjlVVkQDDiHiko= X-Received: by 10.107.53.231 with SMTP id k100mr20800197ioo.292.1519804242668; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 23:50:42 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.79.197.4 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 23:50:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87zi3uumh2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20180221190553.GA5485@jurong> <87d10yqfwj.fsf@elephly.net> <20180221213453.GA5024@jurong> <87bmgiq9c2.fsf@elephly.net> <20180221222236.GA5529@jurong> <87zi3uumh2.fsf@gnu.org> From: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 08:50:42 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1144a15803322b05664100fd" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) --001a1144a15803322b05664100fd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2018-02-27 22:55 GMT+01:00 Ludovic Court=C3=A8s : > Andreas Enge skribis: > > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:14:21PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > >> Even so, you=E2=80=99ll have a file called =E2=80=9Cmanifest=E2=80=9D = in the profile directory. > >> This is unrelated to whether you used a manifest to create the profile > >> or not. > > > > I see! Yes, it appeared twice. > > Looking more closely, it=E2=80=99s actually possible even now to create a > profile with the exact same entry twice: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > $ guix package -p foo -i gnutls gnutls > La jenaj pakoj estos instalataj: > gnutls 3.5.13 /gnu/store/g09is0bw144d8zrd059fiarqmjq7vr > 8a-gnutls-3.5.13 > gnutls 3.5.13 /gnu/store/g09is0bw144d8zrd059fiarqmjq7vr > 8a-gnutls-3.5.13 > > substitute: updating list of substitutes from 'https://berlin.guixsd.org'= ... > 100.0% > substitute: updating list of substitutes from ' > https://mirror.hydra.gnu.org'... 100.0% > La jenaj derivoj estos konstruataj: > /gnu/store/viykf0jcxc9c51yl0p1023b75khad7jn-profile.drv > /gnu/store/yi996sf93p8n15ijf27hcck1b6prywrl-info-dir.drv > /gnu/store/ki7jrd29isi0l1zk93vrqd1p4by08nw7-fonts-dir.drv > /gnu/store/0xkp49578vpjc7q96kyg052v4jhx439m-ca-certificate-bundle.drv > /gnu/store/yxbrnjbxjcdx6nvs8l0wm8236mvx14l7-manual-database.drv > Creating manual page database... > 144 entries processed in 0.1 s > pakoj 2 en profilo > La jenaj medi-variablaj difinoj povos esti necesaj: > export PATH=3D"foo/bin${PATH:+:}$PATH" > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > Weird, but no big deal since they are really the same entry. > > (What=E2=80=99s *not* permitted is installing several =E2=80=9Cgnutls=E2= =80=9D packages having a > different store file name. See =E2=80=98check-for-collisions=E2=80=99 in= (guix > profiles).) > > What should we do? Status quo? Throwing a =E2=80=98delete-duplicates=E2= =80=99 call? > Let=E2=80=99s have a poll! ;-) > > I think if the manifest is generated automatically, then duplicates can be removed automatically reducing clobber, (most probably the user doesn't care anyways), but when using a manifest file there should be a warning about it, so the problem will not be retained. (These users most probably care about this, I think this can point to problematic manifest authoring practices.) > Ludo=E2=80=99. > > > > --001a1144a15803322b05664100fd Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
2018= -02-27 22:55 GMT+01:00 Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org>:
=
Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:

> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:14:21PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> Even so, you=E2=80=99ll have a file called =E2=80=9Cmanifest=E2=80= =9D in the profile directory.
>> This is unrelated to whether you used a manifest to create the pro= file
>> or not.
>
> I see! Yes, it appeared twice.

Looking more closely, it=E2=80=99s actually possible even now to cre= ate a
profile with the exact same entry twice:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--= -
$ guix package -p foo -i gnutls gnutls
La jenaj pakoj estos instalataj:
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 gnutls=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 3.5.13=C2=A0 /gnu= /store/g09is0bw144d8zrd059fiarqmjq7vr8a-gnutls-3.5.13
=C2=A0 =C2=A0gnutls=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A03.5.13=C2=A0 /gnu/store/= g09is0bw144d8zrd059fiarqmjq7vr8a-gnutls-3.5.13

substitute: updating list of substitutes from 'https://berlin.gu= ixsd.org'... 100.0%
substitute: updating list of substitutes from 'https://mirror.hydra.= gnu.org'... 100.0%
La jenaj derivoj estos konstruataj:
=C2=A0 =C2=A0/gnu/store/viykf0jcxc9c51yl0p1023b75khad7jn-profile.= drv
=C2=A0 =C2=A0/gnu/store/yi996sf93p8n15ijf27hcck1b6prywrl-info-dir= .drv
=C2=A0 =C2=A0/gnu/store/ki7jrd29isi0l1zk93vrqd1p4by08nw7-fonts-di= r.drv
=C2=A0 =C2=A0/gnu/store/0xkp49578vpjc7q96kyg052v4jhx439m-ca-certi= ficate-bundle.drv
=C2=A0 =C2=A0/gnu/store/yxbrnjbxjcdx6nvs8l0wm8236mvx14l7-manual-d= atabase.drv
Creating manual page database...
144 entries processed in 0.1 s
pakoj 2 en profilo
La jenaj medi-variablaj difinoj povos esti necesaj:
=C2=A0 =C2=A0export PATH=3D"foo/bin${PATH:+:}$PATH"
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--= -

Weird, but no big deal since they are really the same entry.

(What=E2=80=99s *not* permitted is installing several =E2=80=9Cgnutls=E2=80= =9D packages having a
different store file name.=C2=A0 See =E2=80=98check-for-collisions=E2=80=99= in (guix
profiles).)

What should we do?=C2=A0 Status quo?=C2=A0 Throwing a =E2=80=98delete-dupli= cates=E2=80=99 call?
Let=E2=80=99s have a poll!=C2=A0 ;-)


I think if the manifest is generated a= utomatically, then
duplicates can be removed automatically reduci= ng clobber,
(most probably the user doesn't care anyways),
but when using a manifest file there should be a warning
= about it, so the problem will not be retained.
(These users most = probably care about this,
I think this can point to problematic m= anifest
authoring practices.)
=C2=A0
Ludo=E2=80=99.




--001a1144a15803322b05664100fd-- From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:41:57 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#30569: Packages count as installed twice Resent-From: Andreas Enge Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 19:23:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30569 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Ricardo Wurmus , 30569@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 30569-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B30569.151984574315214 (code B ref 30569); Wed, 28 Feb 2018 19:23:01 +0000 Received: (at 30569) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2018 19:22:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37865 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1er7J0-0003xJ-VC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 14:22:23 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:60506) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1er7Iz-0003xB-3x for 30569@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 14:22:21 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE20911E61; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 20:22:19 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iZWIpeYrD7ee; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 20:22:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from jurong (unknown [IPv6:2001:910:103f::c1e]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 213AA11E58; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 20:22:19 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 20:22:17 +0100 From: Andreas Enge Message-ID: <20180228192217.GA2626@jurong> References: <20180221190553.GA5485@jurong> <87d10yqfwj.fsf@elephly.net> <20180221213453.GA5024@jurong> <87bmgiq9c2.fsf@elephly.net> <20180221222236.GA5529@jurong> <87zi3uumh2.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87zi3uumh2.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21) X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 10:55:05PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > What should we do? Status quo? Throwing a ‘delete-duplicates’ call? > Let’s have a poll! ;-) The thing is confusing, and delete-duplicates should be essentially for free, so I would support to call it. (Well, I filed the bug since I consider this behaviour to be a bug, no big surprise then!) Andreas From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:41:57 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Andreas Enge Subject: bug#30569: closed (Re: bug#30569: Packages count as installed twice) Message-ID: References: <87h8q06jcg.fsf@gnu.org> <20180221190553.GA5485@jurong> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 30569 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix Reply-To: 30569@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2018 13:02:03 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1519909323-27418-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1519909323-27418-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #30569: Profile can contain the exact same entry several times which was filed against the guix package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 30569@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 30569: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D30569 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1519909323-27418-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 30569-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Mar 2018 13:01:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38299 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1erNpd-000777-IF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2018 08:01:09 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:37850) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1erNpZ-00076x-Lo for 30569-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2018 08:01:08 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 272331179F; Thu, 1 Mar 2018 14:01:05 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pm_Xh4c_15DJ; Thu, 1 Mar 2018 14:01:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from ribbon (unknown [193.50.110.134]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 08DEE11C4; Thu, 1 Mar 2018 14:01:04 +0100 (CET) From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: bug#30569: Packages count as installed twice References: <20180221190553.GA5485@jurong> <87d10yqfwj.fsf@elephly.net> <20180221213453.GA5024@jurong> <87bmgiq9c2.fsf@elephly.net> <20180221222236.GA5529@jurong> <87zi3uumh2.fsf@gnu.org> <20180228192217.GA2626@jurong> <87r2p4n5xn.fsf@elephly.net> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 11 =?utf-8?Q?Vent=C3=B4se?= an 226 de la =?utf-8?Q?R?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2018 14:01:03 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87r2p4n5xn.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Wed, 28 Feb 2018 22:46:28 +0100") Message-ID: <87h8q06jcg.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 30569-done Cc: Andreas Enge , 30569-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > Andreas Enge writes: > >> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 10:55:05PM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >>> What should we do? Status quo? Throwing a =E2=80=98delete-duplicates= =E2=80=99 call? >>> Let=E2=80=99s have a poll! ;-) >> >> The thing is confusing, and delete-duplicates should be essentially for = free, >> so I would support to call it. (Well, I filed the bug since I consider t= his >> behaviour to be a bug, no big surprise then!) > > I agree. I don=E2=80=99t see a reason to allow for the same package to a= ppear > more than once in the manifest. Alright, fixed in 435603a1d6106b535cf143d17cb030b2d0795b54, thanks! Ludo=E2=80=99. ------------=_1519909323-27418-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2018 19:06:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54763 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eoZiX-0007af-0N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:06:13 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59507) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eoZiV-0007aO-S9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:06:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoZiO-0008FI-HV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:06:06 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:52772) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoZiO-0008F2-6J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:06:04 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50390) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoZiM-0002Wh-2m for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:06:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoZiI-00088K-3X for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:06:01 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:36810) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoZiH-000861-Ms for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:05:57 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FE7E109E7; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 20:05:55 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UBWPbmu7blpk; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 20:05:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from jurong (unknown [147.210.21.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9DDD0DC6C; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 20:05:54 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 20:05:53 +0100 From: Andreas Enge To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Packages count as installed twice Message-ID: <20180221190553.GA5485@jurong> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Hello, trying to upgrade my packages, I notice something curious: $ ./pre-inst-env guix package -n -u The following packages would be upgraded: ... gnutls 3.5.13 -> 3.5.13 /gnu/store/1ah3fd12w6v66q6yjdmd39xbisqi0gpw-gnutls-3.5.13 gnutls 3.5.13 -> 3.5.13 /gnu/store/1ah3fd12w6v66q6yjdmd39xbisqi0gpw-gnutls-3.5.13 ... There is twice the exactly same package! $ ./pre-inst-env guix package -I gnutls gnutls 3.5.13 out /gnu/store/g09is0bw144d8zrd059fiarqmjq7vr8a-gnutls-3.5.13 gnutls 3.5.13 out /gnu/store/g09is0bw144d8zrd059fiarqmjq7vr8a-gnutls-3.5.13 This looks like a bug to me... Andreas ------------=_1519909323-27418-1-- From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:41:57 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#30569: Packages count as installed twice Resent-From: Ricardo Wurmus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2018 05:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30569 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Andreas Enge Cc: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 30569@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 30569-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B30569.152005535220564 (code B ref 30569); Sat, 03 Mar 2018 05:36:01 +0000 Received: (at 30569) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Mar 2018 05:35:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41752 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1erzpo-0005Lc-3s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2018 00:35:52 -0500 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21080) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1erzpl-0005LR-PV for 30569@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2018 00:35:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1519854392; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; l=672; bh=dYhX6Wyku7zY3rJ5qlcVOaoIoqPhyaM39WSQNe2E75o=; b=W5LCVQhlp2efcIbFQsXbGpAuJ/yBpfM4T5yQuJpCrDFXNgd5o+XuE12oGOb3vTjq UqEy1NGORNi50MAEmkf91hU3kAlVf17HcYOgtvh+RXKsFvhVkrBH8zlVVrTSj3+Louk lyjcfuVLU/k5SzcvaxwmLrVqgqncR8x7FzUqegyw= Received: from localhost (port-92-200-97-195.dynamic.qsc.de [92.200.97.195]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1519854392272985.9792165392693; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 13:46:32 -0800 (PST) References: <20180221190553.GA5485@jurong> <87d10yqfwj.fsf@elephly.net> <20180221213453.GA5024@jurong> <87bmgiq9c2.fsf@elephly.net> <20180221222236.GA5529@jurong> <87zi3uumh2.fsf@gnu.org> <20180228192217.GA2626@jurong> User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 25.3.1 From: Ricardo Wurmus In-reply-to: <20180228192217.GA2626@jurong> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 22:46:28 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <87r2p4n5xn.fsf@elephly.net> X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Andreas Enge writes: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 10:55:05PM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> What should we do? Status quo? Throwing a =E2=80=98delete-duplicates= =E2=80=99 call? >> Let=E2=80=99s have a poll! ;-) > > The thing is confusing, and delete-duplicates should be essentially for f= ree, > so I would support to call it. (Well, I filed the bug since I consider th= is > behaviour to be a bug, no big surprise then!) I agree. I don=E2=80=99t see a reason to allow for the same package to app= ear more than once in the manifest. -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net