From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 21 14:06:13 2018 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2018 19:06:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54763 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eoZiX-0007af-0N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:06:13 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59507) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eoZiV-0007aO-S9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:06:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoZiO-0008FI-HV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:06:06 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:52772) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoZiO-0008F2-6J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:06:04 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50390) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoZiM-0002Wh-2m for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:06:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoZiI-00088K-3X for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:06:01 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:36810) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoZiH-000861-Ms for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:05:57 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FE7E109E7; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 20:05:55 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UBWPbmu7blpk; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 20:05:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from jurong (unknown [147.210.21.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9DDD0DC6C; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 20:05:54 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 20:05:53 +0100 From: Andreas Enge To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Packages count as installed twice Message-ID: <20180221190553.GA5485@jurong> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Hello, trying to upgrade my packages, I notice something curious: $ ./pre-inst-env guix package -n -u The following packages would be upgraded: ... gnutls 3.5.13 -> 3.5.13 /gnu/store/1ah3fd12w6v66q6yjdmd39xbisqi0gpw-gnutls-3.5.13 gnutls 3.5.13 -> 3.5.13 /gnu/store/1ah3fd12w6v66q6yjdmd39xbisqi0gpw-gnutls-3.5.13 ... There is twice the exactly same package! $ ./pre-inst-env guix package -I gnutls gnutls 3.5.13 out /gnu/store/g09is0bw144d8zrd059fiarqmjq7vr8a-gnutls-3.5.13 gnutls 3.5.13 out /gnu/store/g09is0bw144d8zrd059fiarqmjq7vr8a-gnutls-3.5.13 This looks like a bug to me... Andreas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 21 14:53:05 2018 Received: (at 30569) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2018 19:53:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54917 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eoaRs-0000Rq-Ln for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:53:04 -0500 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21012) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eoaRo-0000RP-Tt for 30569@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:53:01 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1519242752; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; l=779; bh=o1DCkPNDZ4AE0EBipvU4RLuVNbYT6lEdEOyNtjw+8to=; b=EQKXETGzk3qy/URxOpNVHRnoiuFgGuLGHeViaVQ8RsQ8RT4DVNbzL4RswDxMKpm8 VGvU9iQqWdSYm0Q5B04K8QOmSH4ObZX63VCNJdNMwz/IAE6nYgROtR91Iy5E+DMJJuj 5TspYeNAprfBcxiq6DUpwQ3vchqwOTXiThlLeuzQ= Received: from localhost (port-92-200-5-116.dynamic.qsc.de [92.200.5.116]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1519242751945174.52131893360786; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:52:31 -0800 (PST) References: <20180221190553.GA5485@jurong> User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 25.3.1 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: bug#30569: Packages count as installed twice In-reply-to: <20180221190553.GA5485@jurong> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 20:52:28 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <87d10yqfwj.fsf@elephly.net> X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 30569 Cc: 30569@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Hi Andreas, > trying to upgrade my packages, I notice something curious: > > $ ./pre-inst-env guix package -n -u > The following packages would be upgraded: > ... > gnutls=093.5.13 -> 3.5.13=09/gnu/store/1ah3fd12w6v66q6yjdmd39xbisqi0gp= w-gnutls-3.5.13 > gnutls=093.5.13 -> 3.5.13=09/gnu/store/1ah3fd12w6v66q6yjdmd39xbisqi0gp= w-gnutls-3.5.13 > ... Does the package appear twice in the profile=E2=80=99s =E2=80=9Cmanifest=E2= =80=9D file (e.g. ~/.guix-profile/manifest)? I=E2=80=99m not sure how it could have ended up there, but one possibility = might be that you had two different versions of gnutls and they have both been upgraded to the latest version. -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 21 16:34:59 2018 Received: (at 30569) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2018 21:34:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54973 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eoc2U-0004sM-V6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 16:34:59 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:42694) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eoc2T-0004sE-3g for 30569@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 16:34:57 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id F155011B42; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 22:34:55 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mh0o92s32Rou; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 22:34:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from jurong (unknown [IPv6:2001:910:103f:0:2d09:8018:be35:9702]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 43F2C11B2E; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 22:34:55 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 22:34:53 +0100 From: Andreas Enge To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: bug#30569: Packages count as installed twice Message-ID: <20180221213453.GA5024@jurong> References: <20180221190553.GA5485@jurong> <87d10yqfwj.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87d10yqfwj.fsf@elephly.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21) X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 30569 Cc: 30569@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Hello, On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 08:52:28PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Does the package appear twice in the profile’s “manifest” file > (e.g. ~/.guix-profile/manifest)? no, I am not using a manifest and do things by hand all the time. > I’m not sure how it could have ended up there, but one possibility might > be that you had two different versions of gnutls and they have both been > upgraded to the latest version. This is a plausible explanation. I ended up running this command: $ ./pre-inst-env guix package -r gnutls -i gnutls guile: warning: failed to install locale warning: failed to install locale: Invalid argument guix package: warning: Consider running 'guix pull' followed by 'guix package -u' to get up-to-date packages and security updates. The following packages will be removed: gnutls 3.5.13 /gnu/store/g09is0bw144d8zrd059fiarqmjq7vr8a-gnutls-3.5.13 gnutls 3.5.13 /gnu/store/g09is0bw144d8zrd059fiarqmjq7vr8a-gnutls-3.5.13 The following package will be upgraded: gnutls 3.5.13 -> 3.5.13 /gnu/store/g09is0bw144d8zrd059fiarqmjq7vr8a-gnutls-3.5.13 Then I ended up with only one listed. Anyway, I do not think it did any harm, but it could indicate a bug somewhere in the code. Andreas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 21 17:14:51 2018 Received: (at 30569) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2018 22:14:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55002 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eocf3-0005qM-OX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:14:49 -0500 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21137) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eocf0-0005qA-SE for 30569@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:14:47 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1519251264; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; l=730; bh=PfvoGGdYuu9WC6thZEpRlVie7Ck87gshSLJlheC53Bw=; b=CkWSIM/OZzOcGxVDhr62c3CK706Qzl4TSQrxbi8E7M6X6rEWNxaUbHJaiux8l1WU b9vAndf7A1/d8IpDq2uEzlt/txyxycyLLaM9J6iuAVnFWcj+PXp0FQrD7T9i++KSb8Q QMu60IYFGK/yekXK2xcpdVORQ+g9bAKmT0fx7CRw= Received: from localhost (port-92-200-5-116.dynamic.qsc.de [92.200.5.116]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1519251264526761.7262696559982; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:14:24 -0800 (PST) References: <20180221190553.GA5485@jurong> <87d10yqfwj.fsf@elephly.net> <20180221213453.GA5024@jurong> User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 25.3.1 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: bug#30569: Packages count as installed twice In-reply-to: <20180221213453.GA5024@jurong> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 23:14:21 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <87bmgiq9c2.fsf@elephly.net> X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 30569 Cc: 30569@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Andreas Enge writes: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 08:52:28PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> Does the package appear twice in the profile=E2=80=99s =E2=80=9Cmanifest= =E2=80=9D file >> (e.g. ~/.guix-profile/manifest)? > > no, I am not using a manifest and do things by hand all the time. Even so, you=E2=80=99ll have a file called =E2=80=9Cmanifest=E2=80=9D in th= e profile directory. This is unrelated to whether you used a manifest to create the profile or not. (This is the second naming conflict in Guix. The other is =E2=80=9Cservice= s=E2=80=9D for system services and shepherd services.) --=20 Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 21 17:15:04 2018 Received: (at 30569) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2018 22:15:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55008 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eocfG-0005rU-PC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:15:04 -0500 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:50659) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eocfE-0005qh-Uj for 30569@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:15:01 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F03720DF6; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:15:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:15:00 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= mesmtp; bh=7Sbq1b3KD/UqKZvdz6xheshQ18iFwA6JFtfEE6t121o=; b=QFvUB b5jZqPivhvNGQSSAW0NLDv3nLmvLzU5BN4cuprUkQzjgVUK+9Tdi1OJ5jEwfMlnI aV6xLj9C2jGze8g3bbL8wynAYXpm2ohJavxeVDI4dCTBpYP0wc2Hp4TLhNvG8JSX ByLt6Kv+6a0WdALXI62Goa0bMih/v55I7voduU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=7Sbq1b3KD/UqKZvdz6xheshQ18iFw A6JFtfEE6t121o=; b=KNyLVXEMd3KZJQNCf/cs0rBkEzit3VbgdgJv+5o6YtAxt heajcaPgnF9Cs9ZhyM+jTMseOHUfkFewGzvmVnK55byq0yU55/FgHFUzKpJfQv3H SL4WvJY8AAg82kzLoh274TP89vE9ZJRi0LswPIDQDz6nGOBMYjmWbp02gtnfQp/I cTYeWkA/YrLs/6jVfZyjso+kPRr/HDz52tGMuE7EIZ4GZ5aK5cdpK6D9hm9A3oYz e1+1BpBsdKPznSWH3AmDmff9GVSaMhTSGbszV42dU0gWCTfc18fepxYbn7f9mjHq TgGbQnJMGVri+PIyKEM+HUlG822B3T/6JmcfnZSHQ== X-ME-Sender: Received: from localhost (c-76-124-202-137.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [76.124.202.137]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id F37DC7E4BC; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:14:59 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:14:58 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: bug#30569: Packages count as installed twice Message-ID: <20180221221458.GA18507@jasmine.lan> References: <20180221190553.GA5485@jurong> <87d10yqfwj.fsf@elephly.net> <20180221213453.GA5024@jurong> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180221213453.GA5024@jurong> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 30569 Cc: Ricardo Wurmus , 30569@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:34:53PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote: > $ ./pre-inst-env guix package -r gnutls -i gnutls > guile: warning: failed to install locale > warning: failed to install locale: Invalid argument > guix package: warning: Consider running 'guix pull' followed by > 'guix package -u' to get up-to-date packages and security updates. >=20 > The following packages will be removed: > gnutls 3.5.13 /gnu/store/g09is0bw144d8zrd059fiarqmjq7vr8a-gnutls-3.5.13 > gnutls 3.5.13 /gnu/store/g09is0bw144d8zrd059fiarqmjq7vr8a-gnutls-3.5.13 >=20 > The following package will be upgraded: > gnutls 3.5.13 -> 3.5.13 /gnu/store/g09is0bw144d8zrd059fiarqmjq7vr8a-gn= utls-3.5.13 It would be interesting to see the profile history. Was the second gnutls introduced after the first one, or were they introduced together? --k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlqN718ACgkQJkb6MLrK fwiMlBAArBLRLC/2wPLyWi8ZgBx1B6AgAcSNwngLEfWmtP2c1YpD8Rf2Q4i65E1r ckk0ThRk2fReCfOWE/FhaJaHY0slCcg/Wwm6SRi1NR0i0GG80k7EjvAXv2ixCDYq j7NEeWeLNuc3v17K2PhhK6F5yWBqnXcErnuEjm98jdLG+a3+l0NhRnD+Q9W7dXeM pDEa6qtikm9ottKGOAaPuQO3A1XVlmtVN6JwawzPwxLfHgsa9w+/ko2sVzsaXeH4 7gyVlzpxh7CqRjfRnfRjKPE7b1T9IfR94gn+uts9Txe+HupHS10oGp+ihRhxR9lJ va0KH6usI6VET+VXp5r75nZQ/3OVVsFqWAYNAmBswDWkPnl3yyb6mqh8nYdFFOP5 Gn2wL17cPVX///iLddUqLcT9Ip2a2FAuRcwKHEU2PbLEngfkvhfrMYeQbMsN/oL0 J4A8MgU/UcrHyDbmBqZuVXkrvyZWEFYUsb+ORlEmuNySh+sefri6kfuvSRWjjP3B UyhmJlgkCUFZiaRWgrhwhRa/RPHzJ2Sfh7//fzkFesBY2LVIg9gecDrtbfsDyEZ1 0mHKDZkmFXoJ1ulprDikcz8YIJLZ2cMqiWsxRI2t5IdlaNVxpHJo1BXeeKJG2yIj JX837QK5wxS0G3pR5nmYNO4Dt5riG9lXHaGel+DPcbWwE/wflFA= =fXsb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 21 17:22:43 2018 Received: (at 30569) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2018 22:22:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55021 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eocmf-00063u-Gh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:22:43 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:43092) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eocmd-00063j-IZ for 30569@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:22:39 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E44211B46; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 23:22:39 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y1RdtzLccO0q; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 23:22:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from jurong (unknown [IPv6:2001:910:103f::c1e]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 595E2119A1; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 23:22:38 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 23:22:36 +0100 From: Andreas Enge To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: bug#30569: Packages count as installed twice Message-ID: <20180221222236.GA5529@jurong> References: <20180221190553.GA5485@jurong> <87d10yqfwj.fsf@elephly.net> <20180221213453.GA5024@jurong> <87bmgiq9c2.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87bmgiq9c2.fsf@elephly.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21) X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 30569 Cc: 30569@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:14:21PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Even so, you’ll have a file called “manifest” in the profile directory. > This is unrelated to whether you used a manifest to create the profile > or not. I see! Yes, it appeared twice. On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 05:14:58PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > It would be interesting to see the profile history. Was the second > gnutls introduced after the first one, or were they introduced together? Unfortunately I cannot tell any more. I only kept the last ten profiles, and all of the corresponding manifest entries contain two copies of the same gnutls. Once both of them were updated. Andreas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 27 16:55:10 2018 Received: (at 30569) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2018 21:55:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36063 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eqnDJ-0001bk-Ra for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 16:55:10 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:55180) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eqnDI-0001bc-3r for 30569@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 16:55:08 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E0B10CBE; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 22:55:07 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mQQsuqe24Di6; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 22:55:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from ribbon (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E1401025C; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 22:55:06 +0100 (CET) From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: bug#30569: Packages count as installed twice References: <20180221190553.GA5485@jurong> <87d10yqfwj.fsf@elephly.net> <20180221213453.GA5024@jurong> <87bmgiq9c2.fsf@elephly.net> <20180221222236.GA5529@jurong> Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 22:55:05 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20180221222236.GA5529@jurong> (Andreas Enge's message of "Wed, 21 Feb 2018 23:22:36 +0100") Message-ID: <87zi3uumh2.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 30569 Cc: Ricardo Wurmus , 30569@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Andreas Enge skribis: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:14:21PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> Even so, you=E2=80=99ll have a file called =E2=80=9Cmanifest=E2=80=9D in= the profile directory. >> This is unrelated to whether you used a manifest to create the profile >> or not. > > I see! Yes, it appeared twice. Looking more closely, it=E2=80=99s actually possible even now to create a profile with the exact same entry twice: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix package -p foo -i gnutls gnutls La jenaj pakoj estos instalataj: gnutls 3.5.13 /gnu/store/g09is0bw144d8zrd059fiarqmjq7vr8a-gnutls-3.5.13 gnutls 3.5.13 /gnu/store/g09is0bw144d8zrd059fiarqmjq7vr8a-gnutls-3.5.13 substitute: updating list of substitutes from 'https://berlin.guixsd.org'..= . 100.0% substitute: updating list of substitutes from 'https://mirror.hydra.gnu.org= '... 100.0% La jenaj derivoj estos konstruataj: /gnu/store/viykf0jcxc9c51yl0p1023b75khad7jn-profile.drv /gnu/store/yi996sf93p8n15ijf27hcck1b6prywrl-info-dir.drv /gnu/store/ki7jrd29isi0l1zk93vrqd1p4by08nw7-fonts-dir.drv /gnu/store/0xkp49578vpjc7q96kyg052v4jhx439m-ca-certificate-bundle.drv /gnu/store/yxbrnjbxjcdx6nvs8l0wm8236mvx14l7-manual-database.drv Creating manual page database... 144 entries processed in 0.1 s pakoj 2 en profilo La jenaj medi-variablaj difinoj povos esti necesaj: export PATH=3D"foo/bin${PATH:+:}$PATH" --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Weird, but no big deal since they are really the same entry. (What=E2=80=99s *not* permitted is installing several =E2=80=9Cgnutls=E2=80= =9D packages having a different store file name. See =E2=80=98check-for-collisions=E2=80=99 in (= guix profiles).) What should we do? Status quo? Throwing a =E2=80=98delete-duplicates=E2= =80=99 call? Let=E2=80=99s have a poll! ;-) Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 27 16:58:40 2018 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2018 21:58:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36076 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eqnGi-0001hD-6E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 16:58:40 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:55208) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eqnGg-0001h6-Ui for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 16:58:39 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2239C11FE5 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 22:58:38 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LfRiBh2p1oeg for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 22:58:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from ribbon (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 681461025C for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 22:58:37 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 22:58:36 +0100 Message-Id: <87sh9mumb7.fsf@gnu.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: control message for bug #30569 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) retitle 30569 Profile can contain the exact same entry several times From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 28 02:50:51 2018 Received: (at 30569) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2018 07:50:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36391 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eqwVn-0004bE-9j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 02:50:51 -0500 Received: from mail-io0-f171.google.com ([209.85.223.171]:40237) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eqwVk-0004b0-Hb for 30569@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 02:50:49 -0500 Received: by mail-io0-f171.google.com with SMTP id v6so2212636iog.7 for <30569@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 23:50:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fBWczF5vQef1V9im/3LTbkfEtoO7tzl35ziByevZi0g=; b=F5sIiMUWbatSwU8+V7rnxBbIf2/1zif40DVD9vPDcML0kMLNpYbRq9lO+d1DLhxC14 2We4pWVd4GnOs2IBeU3NdzWTb1tPLLgcrTQMYyebaU4lvttapZWa0dY5GoMeCgwchIzD sS6U1tJn8GbM1ji+p2mde8UrAT5QUZZQVKCvpJAnpUDSzTcs+FfCSLr4uF7ce/WSiqFM SG9wE1s+5Fgqv+kvrytj21WoyONsk8rPGeV5hrISw2h+9H3fFOB2+47e0QI003gmcNa3 f6lMQE38NgCSKbndc5+GHYbGvuBHxAnnnop1mVITOyn9o+qvTwy2NwUVS06n9deSAXpo Cliw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fBWczF5vQef1V9im/3LTbkfEtoO7tzl35ziByevZi0g=; b=tpxl4fxdyxJh07rt55deSIggHqh32aHwZznxHY+LgExJNVsVfzgINxD7xwy6NyKioF p87Df5pfWzRMGblBWchxtXsF2GEefwfIqKRxbKJUP3o41F+tVyP6YFu8c3FbpJHyx5lF x5NdAlKIQ+jTGH2d/lupP68jC/PXhljpvvjm+A04ORZZygPd3SLP+ba9qMDJobNRHyX3 2sHWG61JnCZgq683sW9PQ6r7jT+v11akkhc+z5zzt17+z/5U3cq1QHqFEPCMwjzWLxNU 8A90q1+5F/A3mUVKuqKIDet4R0ZGu6tpcmBCABPtjwZW3/XJ13ETHp7Vgnj4eLY0HblF fjbg== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPBd/DouogyqTiM9sors+P+5XDIzFXciNKOKy/8bLN+ybHNFL1fb 9k4wXyZ8I7nIRM7H2h6JSfUFmA9zKkeu1x0orQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELu6upv0/F8rVFLK3DOsGA3GYlcvwDsNnf7V/bMck5vBNDtJQ7PJ2hL8dSzKaeB7yY6aaRbQ4TjlVVkQDDiHiko= X-Received: by 10.107.53.231 with SMTP id k100mr20800197ioo.292.1519804242668; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 23:50:42 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.79.197.4 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 23:50:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87zi3uumh2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20180221190553.GA5485@jurong> <87d10yqfwj.fsf@elephly.net> <20180221213453.GA5024@jurong> <87bmgiq9c2.fsf@elephly.net> <20180221222236.GA5529@jurong> <87zi3uumh2.fsf@gnu.org> From: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor_Boskovits?= Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 08:50:42 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#30569: Packages count as installed twice To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1144a15803322b05664100fd" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 30569 Cc: Andreas Enge , 30569@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) --001a1144a15803322b05664100fd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2018-02-27 22:55 GMT+01:00 Ludovic Court=C3=A8s : > Andreas Enge skribis: > > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:14:21PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > >> Even so, you=E2=80=99ll have a file called =E2=80=9Cmanifest=E2=80=9D = in the profile directory. > >> This is unrelated to whether you used a manifest to create the profile > >> or not. > > > > I see! Yes, it appeared twice. > > Looking more closely, it=E2=80=99s actually possible even now to create a > profile with the exact same entry twice: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > $ guix package -p foo -i gnutls gnutls > La jenaj pakoj estos instalataj: > gnutls 3.5.13 /gnu/store/g09is0bw144d8zrd059fiarqmjq7vr > 8a-gnutls-3.5.13 > gnutls 3.5.13 /gnu/store/g09is0bw144d8zrd059fiarqmjq7vr > 8a-gnutls-3.5.13 > > substitute: updating list of substitutes from 'https://berlin.guixsd.org'= ... > 100.0% > substitute: updating list of substitutes from ' > https://mirror.hydra.gnu.org'... 100.0% > La jenaj derivoj estos konstruataj: > /gnu/store/viykf0jcxc9c51yl0p1023b75khad7jn-profile.drv > /gnu/store/yi996sf93p8n15ijf27hcck1b6prywrl-info-dir.drv > /gnu/store/ki7jrd29isi0l1zk93vrqd1p4by08nw7-fonts-dir.drv > /gnu/store/0xkp49578vpjc7q96kyg052v4jhx439m-ca-certificate-bundle.drv > /gnu/store/yxbrnjbxjcdx6nvs8l0wm8236mvx14l7-manual-database.drv > Creating manual page database... > 144 entries processed in 0.1 s > pakoj 2 en profilo > La jenaj medi-variablaj difinoj povos esti necesaj: > export PATH=3D"foo/bin${PATH:+:}$PATH" > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > Weird, but no big deal since they are really the same entry. > > (What=E2=80=99s *not* permitted is installing several =E2=80=9Cgnutls=E2= =80=9D packages having a > different store file name. See =E2=80=98check-for-collisions=E2=80=99 in= (guix > profiles).) > > What should we do? Status quo? Throwing a =E2=80=98delete-duplicates=E2= =80=99 call? > Let=E2=80=99s have a poll! ;-) > > I think if the manifest is generated automatically, then duplicates can be removed automatically reducing clobber, (most probably the user doesn't care anyways), but when using a manifest file there should be a warning about it, so the problem will not be retained. (These users most probably care about this, I think this can point to problematic manifest authoring practices.) > Ludo=E2=80=99. > > > > --001a1144a15803322b05664100fd Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
2018= -02-27 22:55 GMT+01:00 Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org>:
=
Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:

> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:14:21PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> Even so, you=E2=80=99ll have a file called =E2=80=9Cmanifest=E2=80= =9D in the profile directory.
>> This is unrelated to whether you used a manifest to create the pro= file
>> or not.
>
> I see! Yes, it appeared twice.

Looking more closely, it=E2=80=99s actually possible even now to cre= ate a
profile with the exact same entry twice:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--= -
$ guix package -p foo -i gnutls gnutls
La jenaj pakoj estos instalataj:
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 gnutls=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 3.5.13=C2=A0 /gnu= /store/g09is0bw144d8zrd059fiarqmjq7vr8a-gnutls-3.5.13
=C2=A0 =C2=A0gnutls=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A03.5.13=C2=A0 /gnu/store/= g09is0bw144d8zrd059fiarqmjq7vr8a-gnutls-3.5.13

substitute: updating list of substitutes from 'https://berlin.gu= ixsd.org'... 100.0%
substitute: updating list of substitutes from 'https://mirror.hydra.= gnu.org'... 100.0%
La jenaj derivoj estos konstruataj:
=C2=A0 =C2=A0/gnu/store/viykf0jcxc9c51yl0p1023b75khad7jn-profile.= drv
=C2=A0 =C2=A0/gnu/store/yi996sf93p8n15ijf27hcck1b6prywrl-info-dir= .drv
=C2=A0 =C2=A0/gnu/store/ki7jrd29isi0l1zk93vrqd1p4by08nw7-fonts-di= r.drv
=C2=A0 =C2=A0/gnu/store/0xkp49578vpjc7q96kyg052v4jhx439m-ca-certi= ficate-bundle.drv
=C2=A0 =C2=A0/gnu/store/yxbrnjbxjcdx6nvs8l0wm8236mvx14l7-manual-d= atabase.drv
Creating manual page database...
144 entries processed in 0.1 s
pakoj 2 en profilo
La jenaj medi-variablaj difinoj povos esti necesaj:
=C2=A0 =C2=A0export PATH=3D"foo/bin${PATH:+:}$PATH"
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--= -

Weird, but no big deal since they are really the same entry.

(What=E2=80=99s *not* permitted is installing several =E2=80=9Cgnutls=E2=80= =9D packages having a
different store file name.=C2=A0 See =E2=80=98check-for-collisions=E2=80=99= in (guix
profiles).)

What should we do?=C2=A0 Status quo?=C2=A0 Throwing a =E2=80=98delete-dupli= cates=E2=80=99 call?
Let=E2=80=99s have a poll!=C2=A0 ;-)


I think if the manifest is generated a= utomatically, then
duplicates can be removed automatically reduci= ng clobber,
(most probably the user doesn't care anyways),
but when using a manifest file there should be a warning
= about it, so the problem will not be retained.
(These users most = probably care about this,
I think this can point to problematic m= anifest
authoring practices.)
=C2=A0
Ludo=E2=80=99.




--001a1144a15803322b05664100fd-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 28 14:22:23 2018 Received: (at 30569) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2018 19:22:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37865 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1er7J0-0003xJ-VC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 14:22:23 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:60506) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1er7Iz-0003xB-3x for 30569@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 14:22:21 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE20911E61; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 20:22:19 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iZWIpeYrD7ee; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 20:22:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from jurong (unknown [IPv6:2001:910:103f::c1e]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 213AA11E58; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 20:22:19 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 20:22:17 +0100 From: Andreas Enge To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-15?Q?Court=E8s?= Subject: Re: bug#30569: Packages count as installed twice Message-ID: <20180228192217.GA2626@jurong> References: <20180221190553.GA5485@jurong> <87d10yqfwj.fsf@elephly.net> <20180221213453.GA5024@jurong> <87bmgiq9c2.fsf@elephly.net> <20180221222236.GA5529@jurong> <87zi3uumh2.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87zi3uumh2.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21) X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 30569 Cc: Ricardo Wurmus , 30569@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 10:55:05PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > What should we do? Status quo? Throwing a ‘delete-duplicates’ call? > Let’s have a poll! ;-) The thing is confusing, and delete-duplicates should be essentially for free, so I would support to call it. (Well, I filed the bug since I consider this behaviour to be a bug, no big surprise then!) Andreas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Mar 01 08:01:09 2018 Received: (at 30569-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Mar 2018 13:01:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38299 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1erNpd-000777-IF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2018 08:01:09 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:37850) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1erNpZ-00076x-Lo for 30569-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2018 08:01:08 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 272331179F; Thu, 1 Mar 2018 14:01:05 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pm_Xh4c_15DJ; Thu, 1 Mar 2018 14:01:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from ribbon (unknown [193.50.110.134]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 08DEE11C4; Thu, 1 Mar 2018 14:01:04 +0100 (CET) From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: bug#30569: Packages count as installed twice References: <20180221190553.GA5485@jurong> <87d10yqfwj.fsf@elephly.net> <20180221213453.GA5024@jurong> <87bmgiq9c2.fsf@elephly.net> <20180221222236.GA5529@jurong> <87zi3uumh2.fsf@gnu.org> <20180228192217.GA2626@jurong> <87r2p4n5xn.fsf@elephly.net> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 11 =?utf-8?Q?Vent=C3=B4se?= an 226 de la =?utf-8?Q?R?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2018 14:01:03 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87r2p4n5xn.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Wed, 28 Feb 2018 22:46:28 +0100") Message-ID: <87h8q06jcg.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 30569-done Cc: Andreas Enge , 30569-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > Andreas Enge writes: > >> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 10:55:05PM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >>> What should we do? Status quo? Throwing a =E2=80=98delete-duplicates= =E2=80=99 call? >>> Let=E2=80=99s have a poll! ;-) >> >> The thing is confusing, and delete-duplicates should be essentially for = free, >> so I would support to call it. (Well, I filed the bug since I consider t= his >> behaviour to be a bug, no big surprise then!) > > I agree. I don=E2=80=99t see a reason to allow for the same package to a= ppear > more than once in the manifest. Alright, fixed in 435603a1d6106b535cf143d17cb030b2d0795b54, thanks! Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Mar 03 00:35:52 2018 Received: (at 30569) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Mar 2018 05:35:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41752 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1erzpo-0005Lc-3s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2018 00:35:52 -0500 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21080) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1erzpl-0005LR-PV for 30569@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2018 00:35:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1519854392; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; l=672; bh=dYhX6Wyku7zY3rJ5qlcVOaoIoqPhyaM39WSQNe2E75o=; b=W5LCVQhlp2efcIbFQsXbGpAuJ/yBpfM4T5yQuJpCrDFXNgd5o+XuE12oGOb3vTjq UqEy1NGORNi50MAEmkf91hU3kAlVf17HcYOgtvh+RXKsFvhVkrBH8zlVVrTSj3+Louk lyjcfuVLU/k5SzcvaxwmLrVqgqncR8x7FzUqegyw= Received: from localhost (port-92-200-97-195.dynamic.qsc.de [92.200.97.195]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1519854392272985.9792165392693; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 13:46:32 -0800 (PST) References: <20180221190553.GA5485@jurong> <87d10yqfwj.fsf@elephly.net> <20180221213453.GA5024@jurong> <87bmgiq9c2.fsf@elephly.net> <20180221222236.GA5529@jurong> <87zi3uumh2.fsf@gnu.org> <20180228192217.GA2626@jurong> User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 25.3.1 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: bug#30569: Packages count as installed twice In-reply-to: <20180228192217.GA2626@jurong> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 22:46:28 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <87r2p4n5xn.fsf@elephly.net> X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 30569 Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 30569@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Andreas Enge writes: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 10:55:05PM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> What should we do? Status quo? Throwing a =E2=80=98delete-duplicates= =E2=80=99 call? >> Let=E2=80=99s have a poll! ;-) > > The thing is confusing, and delete-duplicates should be essentially for f= ree, > so I would support to call it. (Well, I filed the bug since I consider th= is > behaviour to be a bug, no big surprise then!) I agree. I don=E2=80=99t see a reason to allow for the same package to app= ear more than once in the manifest. -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:26:52 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2018 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator