From unknown Wed Jun 18 23:08:46 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#30566 <30566@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#30566 <30566@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: While searching for packages, deprecated packages should be ignored Reply-To: bug#30566 <30566@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 06:08:46 +0000 retitle 30566 While searching for packages, deprecated packages should be i= gnored reassign 30566 guix submitter 30566 Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling severity 30566 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 21 04:03:31 2018 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2018 09:03:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53591 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eoQJG-0007G4-Re for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 04:03:31 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46182) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eoQJF-0007Fr-Vu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 04:03:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoQJ9-00043F-VR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 04:03:25 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:35593) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoQJ9-000433-S7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 04:03:23 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37135) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoQJ8-0002Kk-G5 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 04:03:23 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoQJ4-0003ym-AI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 04:03:21 -0500 Received: from m4s11.vlinux.de ([83.151.27.109]:51475 helo=bjoernhoefling.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoQJ4-0003y9-34 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 04:03:18 -0500 Received: from alma-ubu (pD951FC9C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.81.252.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bjoernhoefling.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92D4D403F9 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 10:03:16 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 10:03:16 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIEjDtmZsaW5n?= To: Subject: While searching for packages, deprecated packages should be ignored Message-ID: <20180221100316.42ccce5f@alma-ubu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) When I search for a deprecated package, I get both the deprecated package and the new one. That is quite confusing and I can't decide which one to take. For example: $ guix package -s geiser name: geiser-next version: 0.9 outputs: out systems: x86_64-linux i686-linux armhf-linux aarch64-linux mips64el-linux dependencies: emacs-minimal-25.3 guile-2.0.14 location: guix/packages.scm:335:2 homepage: https://nongnu.org/geiser/ license: Modified BSD synopsis: Collection of Emacs modes for Guile and Racket hacking =20 description: [..] relevance: 6 name: geiser version: 0.9 outputs: out systems: x86_64-linux i686-linux armhf-linux aarch64-linux mips64el-linux dependencies: emacs-minimal-25.3 guile-2.0.14 location: gnu/packages/emacs.scm:314:2 homepage: https://nongnu.org/geiser/ license: Modified BSD synopsis: Collection of Emacs modes for Guile and Racket hacking =20 description:=20 [..] relevance: 6 Here I get two exactly same results, besides the package name and the source code line number. I have to look into the package sources to find out which of the two is the not-deprecated one. As a user, I would like to see only the new package mentioned. Maybe some users also want a short note like: "geiser formerly known as geiser-new." Technical background: `deprecated-package` is defined in `guix/packages.scm`:=20 ``` (define (deprecated-package old-name p) "Return a package called OLD-NAME and marked as superseded by P, a package object." (package (inherit p) (name old-name) (properties `((superseded . ,p))))) ``` That means the `guix package -s` should somehow make use of the `superseeded` property. Bj=C3=B6rn From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 27 09:49:40 2018 Received: (at 30566-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2018 14:49:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34599 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eqgZX-00044W-TG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 09:49:40 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:52532) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eqgZV-00044N-Us for 30566-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 09:49:38 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05C711FDE; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 15:49:36 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ROYo1wPpwbCf; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 15:49:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from ribbon (unknown [193.50.110.216]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F297E10638; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 15:49:35 +0100 (CET) From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_H=C3=B6fling?= Subject: Re: bug#30566: While searching for packages, deprecated packages should be ignored References: <20180221100316.42ccce5f@alma-ubu> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 9 =?utf-8?Q?Vent=C3=B4se?= an 226 de la =?utf-8?Q?R?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 15:49:35 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20180221100316.42ccce5f@alma-ubu> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Bj=C3=B6rn?= =?utf-8?Q?_H=C3=B6fling=22's?= message of "Wed, 21 Feb 2018 10:03:16 +0100") Message-ID: <87fu5m32tc.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 30566-done Cc: 30566-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Hello Bj=C3=B6rn, Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling skribis: > I have to look into the package sources to find out which of the two is > the not-deprecated one. Fixed in 0fb405796cdb5579c911b30da9d40b4a18cd7f07. Deprecated packages are entirely hidden in this case, which I think is the right thing: we don=E2=80=99t want people to use the deprecated name. Thank you! Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Wed Jun 18 23:08:46 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 11:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator