Subject: Re: bug#30560: Better format for view-lossage

From: Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 15:55:53 +0200

> From: Robert Pluim <[email-masked]>
> Cc: Juri Linkov <[email-masked]>,  [email-masked]
> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:09:52 +0100
> 
> Might I suggest the following as well?

LGTM, thanks.

> Does this need mentioning in the info docs?

The format of the output of view-lossage is currently not mentioned in
the manuals, AFAICS.  If it is self-explanatory enough, maybe we
should leave it that way (and mark the NEWS entry with "---").