GNU bug report logs -
#30495
[PATCH] bash completion: Complete files names after 'guix package -m'.
Previous Next
Reported by: Oleg Pykhalov <go.wigust <at> gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 09:09:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Oleg Pykhalov <go.wigust <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report
#30495: [PATCH] bash completion: Complete files names after 'guix package -m'.
which was filed against the guix-patches package, has been closed.
The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 30495 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
--
30495: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=30495
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com> writes:
> Oleg Pykhalov <go.wigust <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> Oleg Pykhalov <go.wigust <at> gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> * etc/completion/bash/guix (_guix_is_dash_L): Replace with
>>>> ‘_guix_is_dash_L_or_m’.
>>>> (_guix_complete): Add this.
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/etc/completion/bash/guix b/etc/completion/bash/guix
>>>> index 6b84193db..286c4f1c5 100644
>>>> --- a/etc/completion/bash/guix
>>>> +++ b/etc/completion/bash/guix
>>>> @@ -97,9 +97,10 @@ _guix_is_removing ()
>>>> $result
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> -_guix_is_dash_L ()
>>>> +_guix_is_dash_L_or_m ()
>>>> {
>>>> - [ "${COMP_WORDS[$COMP_CWORD - 1]}" = "-L" ] \
>>>> + comp_words_minus_1="${COMP_WORDS[$COMP_CWORD - 1]}"
>>>> + [ "$comp_words_minus_1" = "-L" ] || [ "$comp_words_minus_1" = "-m" ] \
>>>> || { case "${COMP_WORDS[$COMP_CWORD]}" in
>>>> --load-path=*) true;;
>>>> *) false;;
>>>
>>> I think this fails to account for the long form "--manifest". Perhaps
>>> it's better to add a new "_guix_is_dash_m" and use
>>>
>>> "if _guix_is_dash_L || _guix_is_dash_m"
>>>
>>> below. WDYT?
>>
>> Nice catch! Thanks.
>>
>> But I don't know how to implement a file completion for ‘--manifest=’.
>> ‘--load-path=’ doesn't have a file completion too. Only completion for
>> equal sign before.
>
> Oh, OK. That's another issue I guess. The patch below LGTM, but the
> commit message needs adjusting ;-)
Ouch, thank you for reminding.
Pushed as f5f916792c7069a22d95c5b7c68bcf3bbb86e451
I'll close the bug report.
Thanks,
Oleg.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]
* etc/completion/bash/guix (_guix_is_dash_L): Replace with
‘_guix_is_dash_L_or_m’.
(_guix_complete): Add this.
---
etc/completion/bash/guix | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/etc/completion/bash/guix b/etc/completion/bash/guix
index 6b84193db..286c4f1c5 100644
--- a/etc/completion/bash/guix
+++ b/etc/completion/bash/guix
@@ -97,9 +97,10 @@ _guix_is_removing ()
$result
}
-_guix_is_dash_L ()
+_guix_is_dash_L_or_m ()
{
- [ "${COMP_WORDS[$COMP_CWORD - 1]}" = "-L" ] \
+ comp_words_minus_1="${COMP_WORDS[$COMP_CWORD - 1]}"
+ [ "$comp_words_minus_1" = "-L" ] || [ "$comp_words_minus_1" = "-m" ] \
|| { case "${COMP_WORDS[$COMP_CWORD]}" in
--load-path=*) true;;
*) false;;
@@ -149,7 +150,7 @@ _guix_complete ()
*)
if _guix_is_command "package"
then
- if _guix_is_dash_L
+ if _guix_is_dash_L_or_m
then
_guix_complete_file
elif _guix_is_removing
--
2.16.1
This bug report was last modified 7 years and 99 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.