GNU bug report logs -
#30495
[PATCH] bash completion: Complete files names after 'guix package -m'.
Previous Next
Reported by: Oleg Pykhalov <go.wigust <at> gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 09:09:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Oleg Pykhalov <go.wigust <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Oleg Pykhalov <go.wigust <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com> writes:
>
>> Oleg Pykhalov <go.wigust <at> gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> * etc/completion/bash/guix (_guix_is_dash_L): Replace with
>>> ‘_guix_is_dash_L_or_m’.
>>> (_guix_complete): Add this.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> diff --git a/etc/completion/bash/guix b/etc/completion/bash/guix
>>> index 6b84193db..286c4f1c5 100644
>>> --- a/etc/completion/bash/guix
>>> +++ b/etc/completion/bash/guix
>>> @@ -97,9 +97,10 @@ _guix_is_removing ()
>>> $result
>>> }
>>>
>>> -_guix_is_dash_L ()
>>> +_guix_is_dash_L_or_m ()
>>> {
>>> - [ "${COMP_WORDS[$COMP_CWORD - 1]}" = "-L" ] \
>>> + comp_words_minus_1="${COMP_WORDS[$COMP_CWORD - 1]}"
>>> + [ "$comp_words_minus_1" = "-L" ] || [ "$comp_words_minus_1" = "-m" ] \
>>> || { case "${COMP_WORDS[$COMP_CWORD]}" in
>>> --load-path=*) true;;
>>> *) false;;
>>
>> I think this fails to account for the long form "--manifest". Perhaps
>> it's better to add a new "_guix_is_dash_m" and use
>>
>> "if _guix_is_dash_L || _guix_is_dash_m"
>>
>> below. WDYT?
>
> Nice catch! Thanks.
>
> But I don't know how to implement a file completion for ‘--manifest=’.
> ‘--load-path=’ doesn't have a file completion too. Only completion for
> equal sign before.
Oh, OK. That's another issue I guess. The patch below LGTM, but the
commit message needs adjusting ;-)
Thank you!
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 7 years and 99 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.