From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:40:20 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#30490 <30490@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#30490 <30490@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 26.0; Elisp manual: indexing performance analysis Reply-To: bug#30490 <30490@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 17:40:20 +0000 retitle 30490 26.0; Elisp manual: indexing performance analysis reassign 30490 emacs submitter 30490 Drew Adams severity 30490 minor thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 16 13:03:19 2018 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Feb 2018 18:03:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47174 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1emkLv-0001ZU-26 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:03:19 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34588) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1emkLt-0001ZD-GC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:03:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emkLn-0006Ew-DE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:03:12 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:47847) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emkLn-0006Em-9U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:03:11 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53788) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emkLm-0001gv-3K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:03:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emkLi-0006C7-3J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:03:10 -0500 Received: from aserp2130.oracle.com ([141.146.126.79]:58442) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emkLh-0006BZ-QO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:03:06 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w1GI2Rk4185096 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 18:03:04 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : subject : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2017-10-26; bh=bdSKv5YxQB1jOBKKjFkjL/05vjYrOGiCS57XvuMAwDk=; b=jBe7j/+RQfC5jksJ/pjANBc3LGwgXnMqhmTZAnWmQN7huq3VDPOLN6n28OGmFuzRAF6u a64Wcmwf2bFCGFMl2b3gfZCjjETfJQDlE73XCjxIjVmH6Q+w/j4getNn4mwOL1/yWad5 v9JfqeCvLjLwVbtrJs1qUTaJiZKVMwtVtRFD5enKq/kmv2f62w995W+wGp+dSnvGNqOH yEsveR2HPyjQlUjJslTBxSRHp+YL+zgHU3gi4drhp4j7nDlF5Unc68QzhUX7vTeljma7 P9T7IMejcOHSSffQ9dCG84ujywOBsMrjNziZMlgplxiNXcKdecbo95afSSPtw0HYq/ac lg== Received: from userv0022.oracle.com (userv0022.oracle.com [156.151.31.74]) by aserp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2g62vfgf9r-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 18:03:04 +0000 Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by userv0022.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w1GI333K015541 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 18:03:03 GMT Received: from abhmp0005.oracle.com (abhmp0005.oracle.com [141.146.116.11]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w1GI32Ip021031 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 18:03:03 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <0650e4e9-8ed9-4d89-beda-b6fb76b26b79@default> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 10:03:01 -0800 (PST) From: Drew Adams To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 26.0; Elisp manual: indexing performance analysis X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.4654.0 (x86)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=8807 signatures=668673 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=1 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=974 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1802160214 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) In the Elisp manual, `i perform TAB' shows `performance analysis'. Following that takes you to node `Coverage Testing' in the Edebug section. That's hardly what I'd call a topic about performance analysis, but I didn't study it in detail. The real bug here is that there is nothing else indexed under the term "performance". (Perhaps some similar word is used, but "performance" is what came to my mind to look for.) `i profil TAB' shows `profiling', which takes you to node `Profiling'. Isn't that about "performance analysis"? Shouldn't it, rather than, or in addition to, `Coverage Testing' be indexed for "performance"? In GNU Emacs 26.0.91 (build 1, x86_64-w64-mingw32) of 2018-01-22 Repository revision: 752fba992b793a74d202c9cfc3e1a92fd458e748 Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7601 Configured using: `configure --without-dbus --host=3Dx86_64-w64-mingw32 --without-compress-install 'CFLAGS=3D-O2 -static -g3'' From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 17 04:18:54 2018 Received: (at 30490-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Feb 2018 09:18:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47475 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1emydy-0004Sx-37 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 04:18:54 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47266) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1emydw-0004Sj-Kj for 30490-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 04:18:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emydo-0002h4-77 for 30490-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 04:18:47 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:50786) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emydo-0002gt-3A; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 04:18:44 -0500 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3353 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1emydn-0001yN-BR; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 04:18:43 -0500 Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 11:18:44 +0200 Message-Id: <838tbsc6tn.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Drew Adams In-reply-to: <0650e4e9-8ed9-4d89-beda-b6fb76b26b79@default> (message from Drew Adams on Fri, 16 Feb 2018 10:03:01 -0800 (PST)) Subject: Re: bug#30490: 26.0; Elisp manual: indexing performance analysis References: <0650e4e9-8ed9-4d89-beda-b6fb76b26b79@default> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 30490-done Cc: 30490-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) > Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 10:03:01 -0800 (PST) > From: Drew Adams > > In the Elisp manual, `i perform TAB' shows `performance analysis'. > Following that takes you to node `Coverage Testing' in the Edebug > section. That's hardly what I'd call a topic about performance > analysis, but I didn't study it in detail. That section describes also frequency counting, which is a sort of performance analysis. > The real bug here is that there is nothing else indexed under the > term "performance". (Perhaps some similar word is used, but > "performance" is what came to my mind to look for.) > > `i profil TAB' shows `profiling', which takes you to node `Profiling'. > Isn't that about "performance analysis"? Shouldn't it, rather than, or > in addition to, `Coverage Testing' be indexed for "performance"? I fixed the indexing to lead also to "Profiling" in this case. Thanks. From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:40:20 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 11:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator