GNU bug report logs - #30469
[PATCH 0/1] Require Guile >= 2.0.14

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 15:27:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #25 received at 30469-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Eric Bavier <ericbavier <at> centurylink.net>
Cc: 30469-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#30469] [PATCH 0/1] Require Guile >= 2.0.14
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 19:49:38 +0100
Eric Bavier <ericbavier <at> centurylink.net> skribis:

> On Sat, 24 Feb 2018 23:41:24 +0100
> ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> 
>> Eric Bavier <ericbavier <at> centurylink.net> skribis:
>> 
>> > On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:26:27 +0100
>> > Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>> >  
>> >> Hello Guix,
>> >> 
>> >> This patch is to require Guile >= 2.0.14, released one year ago, instead
>> >> of 2.0.9, released in 2013.
>> >> 
>> >> For the record, here’s the distro status:
>> >> 
>> >>   • Debian unstable has 2.2:
>> >>     <https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=default&section=all&arch=any&searchon=names&keywords=guile-2.2>.
>> >> 
>> >>   • Older Debian versions have 2.0.13 (not .14):
>> >>     <https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=guile-2.0>.  
>> >
>> > How much of this patch would change if it were to instead support
>> > 2.0.13?  Is cutting off users of Debian stable a good idea?  
>> 
>> I’ll double-check but I think the patch remains valid if we require
>> 2.0.13.
>> 
>> If it works I’ll commit that next week.
>
> Cool.

Pushed as 1d84d7bf6052c0c80bd212d4524876576e9817d4.

Thanks for your feedback!

Ludo’.




This bug report was last modified 7 years and 171 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.