From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 15 09:25:32 2018 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Feb 2018 14:25:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43813 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1emKTc-0006J3-L3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 09:25:32 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43215) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1emKTa-0006Ip-Qw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 09:25:31 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emKTU-0002lY-81 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 09:25:25 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:37434) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emKTT-0002lE-Vy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 09:25:24 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34145) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emKTS-0002Js-4q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 09:25:23 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emKTO-0002fd-Tv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 09:25:22 -0500 Received: from mail-wr0-x242.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c0c::242]:33403) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emKTO-0002e1-Kl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 09:25:18 -0500 Received: by mail-wr0-x242.google.com with SMTP id s5so3556181wra.0 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 06:25:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=user-agent:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=RO9bf7k0Z6tyxr+3DyCr/6X0qxwgOAgGgNRVtVibzt4=; b=HOPQeCYZ9Bl/h2LjMkYCxFrucVDygNdeQnYfxO93xpyIPz89LXGA3WkAvCblcubC/m XjIZWj+TIe7kzVI1RGZXdPAMwsvjpYtOCQfsma2fX0c9gQ55ZRqHZp8zWJPjodiWdE6X N943uX/djWhjAR7E67GZgmhGvZgcYibPj9kPFYIKbVPZhLVGaS1tRhisxEQ1ID467O0Z Jlx3Bv4nxzgQvL3e3zqsbzBpcv/hnjoZda40zO4H9Ir0Z+y5l6bBkdXIeTibVd7u518R nUVIvLQiOKb4Dv8eu4X3qjpsCO3CJwga3eurj0AKEGnlY08Lksa7REpFuI+Z4Yn1zmIa hoeQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:from:to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=RO9bf7k0Z6tyxr+3DyCr/6X0qxwgOAgGgNRVtVibzt4=; b=TmcB/k0w6sAlJmRmOvlnbhm9I3rIcB3QV6aRbkD15/dSE6JMq6+BJTck7q1WKVAGJD WgjIEiBVvzSeFuO94Jyugo1F69WtuaDF39bHry5VxigZuyHPHeoqKBA3OgZ80h0azW54 o/aoUOaxqFNVwOcQLa4levVLGJcsRIeJh99JGMi7cTZgi/b2MBxPpXZr7OA0a81BwPsv eeXlVx1Gu/BQ3AErfTAJIJPjYtXqwSqPO/i+b5YxC2H6U6sNGvDogyhcHvvx/Np6usKi 5kWB29yO+PaQb4hW3u1TRO9RN7ckI22ILVJHdJq/4NxYdcVrOncZkaZm/Qe8NLNBQWZI oqKA== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPBDDF5T6mljllfmUtVm0pjPyrp5ZsN1Ub0xujsAvzsTRMeT9jVV S75eTXrx9caOLBo6kfyGAhHCPZDs X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x2275lO5bVltiZkM3UlCgIOknbF4/hXDvSg+ZqvPtGhozSSNK6hLL969mtk9ORFiO/Rt/+L/UzQ== X-Received: by 10.223.167.72 with SMTP id e8mr2937683wrd.138.1518704716938; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 06:25:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from mimimi (18.160.3.93.rev.sfr.net. [93.3.160.18]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o13sm25139449wrc.62.2018.02.15.06.25.15 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 15 Feb 2018 06:25:16 -0800 (PST) User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 25.3.1 From: Pierre Neidhardt To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 25.3; Eshell: Ignore all duplicates when ignoredups is non-nil Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 15:25:14 +0100 Message-ID: <87606ywcs5.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) At the moment, when `eshell-hist-ignoredups' is non-nil, the command won't be appended to the history if it's the same as the last entry. This does not prevent Eshell from cluttering the history with the same commands as long as they are not consecutive (e.g. A, B, A, B...). I find more useful to always remove the duplicate entry back to the first position. It makes the history much lighter and much easier to browse/filter. This is especially useful when using a completion framework such as Helm, Ivy. I could not find a way to customize this myself without modifying Eshell's code. Here it goes: (defun eshell-add-input-to-history (input) "Add the string INPUT to the history ring. Input is entered into the input history ring, if the value of variable `eshell-input-filter' returns non-nil when called on the input." (when (funcall eshell-input-filter input) (when eshell-hist-ignoredups (ring-remove eshell-history-ring (ring-member eshell-history-ring input))) (eshell-put-history input)) (setq eshell-save-history-index eshell-history-index) (setq eshell-history-index nil)) We could also keep the current behaviour and add a separate option to implement the behaviour I mentioned. In GNU Emacs 25.3.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.22.26) of 2017-12-16 built on build Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11906000 System Description: Void Linux Configured using: 'configure --with-x-toolkit=gtk3 --with-xwidgets --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --sbindir=/usr/bin --bindir=/usr/bin --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --localstatedir=/var --with-file-notification=inotify --with-modules --with-jpeg --with-tiff --with-gif --with-png --with-xpm --with-rsvg --without-imagemagick --with-xml2 --with-gnutls --with-sound --with-m17n-flt --host=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu --build=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu 'CFLAGS=-fno-PIE -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe -g' 'CPPFLAGS= ' 'LDFLAGS=-no-pie -Wl,--as-needed '' Configured features: XPM JPEG TIFF GIF PNG RSVG SOUND DBUS GSETTINGS NOTIFY ACL GNUTLS LIBXML2 FREETYPE M17N_FLT LIBOTF XFT ZLIB TOOLKIT_SCROLL_BARS GTK3 X11 MODULES XWIDGETS Important settings: value of $LC_COLLATE: C value of $LANG: en_US.UTF-8 locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 15 12:24:20 2018 Received: (at 30466) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Feb 2018 17:24:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45050 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1emNGe-0002L1-Aa for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 12:24:20 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56536) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1emNGc-0002Ko-HD for 30466@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 12:24:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emNGW-0000jD-Mg for 30466@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 12:24:13 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:35267) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emNGU-0000ig-N7; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 12:24:10 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1emNGU-0003WD-0E; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 12:24:10 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: Pierre Neidhardt Subject: Re: bug#30466: 25.3; Eshell: Ignore all duplicates when ignoredups is non-nil References: <87606ywcs5.fsf@gmail.com> X-Spook: Becker Smart Tornado Pakistan import Delays Plague Comirex X-Ran: 1w/qfbxv*h7>~'t>;:lg[|:sC"{y(a`Hr$a?~4m^G8!e/"Lz/RVL>Kt}nvvfz\qs}y{L{x X-Hue: yellow X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 12:24:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87606ywcs5.fsf@gmail.com> (Pierre Neidhardt's message of "Thu, 15 Feb 2018 15:25:14 +0100") Message-ID: <4qpo56p3nq.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 30466 Cc: 30466@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > This does not prevent Eshell from cluttering the history with the same > commands as long as they are not consecutive (e.g. A, B, A, B...). > > I find more useful to always remove the duplicate entry back to the > first position. It makes the history much lighter and much easier to > browse/filter. In terms of bash HISTCONTROL, this is the difference between "ignoredups" and "erasedups". Ref eg https://www.gnu.org/s/bash/manual/html_node/Bash-Variables.html#index-HISTCONTROL From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 04 05:56:34 2021 Received: (at 30466) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2021 10:56:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39838 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7cJO-0001LZ-5E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 05:56:34 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:56134) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7cJL-0001LF-SL for 30466@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 05:56:32 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=5FLoUDLd7m1nYUt6dR+LmltzwBFMMqq3yWHWGvZlhhI=; b=QP2atHQPTASur2Nzwqc9Akt0Xq U2uvZtBwVyr//tnnm7oZ28Ax1XLUFe97HZZyIT5GphMGpsL7ME2Or4qz/7H5CwBp2oEgjE/aEh1Kj BZ7S7O2gFxCVc9dBlFuUvful88GB5y1Mb65IOI97XCJoHpXMrAY0s9pB2gzGsaknNsjQ=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l7cJ5-00067f-FC; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 11:56:25 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Glenn Morris Subject: Re: bug#30466: 25.3; Eshell: Ignore all duplicates when ignoredups is non-nil References: <87606ywcs5.fsf@gmail.com> <4qpo56p3nq.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-Now-Playing: Overmono's _#savefabric (6)_: "U-Plastics" Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 11:56:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4qpo56p3nq.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Glenn Morris's message of "Thu, 15 Feb 2018 12:24:09 -0500") Message-ID: <87o8h0rtip.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Glenn Morris writes: >> This does not prevent Eshell from cluttering the history with the same >> commands as long as they are not consecutive (e.g. A, B, A, B...). >> >> I find more useful to always remove the duplicate [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 30466 Cc: 30466@debbugs.gnu.org, Pierre Neidhardt X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Glenn Morris writes: >> This does not prevent Eshell from cluttering the history with the same >> commands as long as they are not consecutive (e.g. A, B, A, B...). >> >> I find more useful to always remove the duplicate entry back to the >> first position. It makes the history much lighter and much easier to >> browse/filter. > > In terms of bash HISTCONTROL, this is the difference between > "ignoredups" and "erasedups". > > Ref eg > https://www.gnu.org/s/bash/manual/html_node/Bash-Variables.html#index-HISTCONTROL Sounds useful to me, so I've now added this to Emacs 28. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 04 05:56:41 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2021 10:56:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39841 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7cJV-0001Ls-FQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 05:56:41 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:56150) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7cJQ-0001LP-Uh for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 05:56:40 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=cUnNfd9MtjvZNvmVxSId2N4gxlShZ8K9gCuCInU8KAE=; b=sn1tOTFn+0NhvubHm/R7PurQPv 2Z8B2YMub8qKnFtOeeFSxYbguQ1zbP17uQLeMA44mHIQPhBuSpw3+Q6WcybJ09exm+95IcLX344LE 6n9Rc34d/kLD42tXtBCvGn7RC8/wXwKmr3n001SMaKsJwx138OeoZmB+0O7DiJMGKK4o=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l7cJJ-00067t-3b for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 11:56:31 +0100 Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 11:56:28 +0100 Message-Id: <87mtwkrtib.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #30466 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 30466 fixed close 30466 28.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 30466 fixed close 30466 28.1 quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 04 06:03:30 2021 Received: (at 30466) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2021 11:03:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39848 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7cQ6-0003hs-Ck for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 06:03:30 -0500 Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.199]:52901) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7cQ4-0003h7-QH for 30466@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 06:03:29 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 86.247.16.87 Received: from bababa (lfbn-idf2-1-709-87.w86-247.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.247.16.87]) (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz) by relay9-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 90BFDFF807; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 11:03:21 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Neidhardt To: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Glenn Morris Subject: Re: bug#30466: 25.3; Eshell: Ignore all duplicates when ignoredups is non-nil In-Reply-To: <87o8h0rtip.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87606ywcs5.fsf@gmail.com> <4qpo56p3nq.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87o8h0rtip.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 12:03:20 +0100 Message-ID: <87czxgjds7.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thank you! -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [217.70.183.199 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [217.70.183.199 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 30466 Cc: 30466@debbugs.gnu.org, Pierre Neidhardt X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thank you! -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [217.70.183.199 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [217.70.183.199 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thank you! =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFGBAEBCAAwFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAmAb1HgSHG1haWxAYW1i cmV2YXIueHl6AAoJEJvc9Jeku8x/tzoIAJzZNR9WynJ1h8TNBMRjW5mrjFE5JJlN +iyvHmgOSHiZ6wwVBFkjtQdzR6KG6QGfzvwqUUVs3WckKB50paCS8YepWvExoa+C 2kRyv9LikCRCInsp8pjR2FLjwtGyGnChp4AZ2RCCsOImHDffo0+gWUvgJDuTpR7S MpmmzJz2HltwcL2H/TRlRqkjTwu+pl/3V7sRzbb/m9Gg3rMQls2HM+MSTit0HrE8 bQGT2geDxcoDcWc8PZ4LgElvEEND3SAKpS476626w8Q+PBQBhEeMYt0IANukIHZX 3OkeLQYygOmvkuQR2i13/5SdqmcNtDuvkcVB2l5wrQNDYPalg3iXkMk= =dqhU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Sat Sep 13 20:35:54 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 12:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator