GNU bug report logs -
#30459
Certbot service patches
Previous Next
Full log
Message #47 received at 30459 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Clément Lassieur <clement <at> lassieur.org> writes:
> Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com> writes:
>
>> Clément Lassieur <clement <at> lassieur.org> writes:
>>
>>> * doc/guix.texi (Certificate Services): Add email field.
>>> * gnu/services/certbot.scm (<certbot-configuration>, certbot-command,
>>> certbot-activation, certbot-nginx-server-configurations): Add email field.
>>> (certbot-command): Add '-n' and '--agree-tos' options.
>>> (certbot-service-type): Remove default-value.
>>
>> Since this effectively hides the ToS from the user, I think we should
>> update documentation to link to it. Something along the lines of
>> "By using this service, you agree to the Terms and Conditions laid out
>> in URL...".
>>
>> I'm not a user of certbot currently and thus haven't tested it, but the
>> other patches LGTM to me. Thanks a lot for working on this!
>
> Thank you very much for the review, Marius, I'll update the
> documentation as you said.
>
> I won't push right now because I'm unconvinced by certbot-activation:
> - it runs at every reconfigure, whereas I want it to run only when the
> configuration changes
> - it runs at system startup (with no internet access, I think) which I
> obviously don't want
> - it requires internet access
I haven't studied the code, but perhaps certbot-activation could be made
a "proper" Shepherd service (e.g. simple-service)? That way it can have
a dependency on networking, at least. It also would not run on every
reconfigure.
> Assuming there is no way to get it to run only on reconfigure when the
> configuration has changed, I could make a command that the user would
> use manually (wich profile-service-type). They would use this command
> if they add new certificates and if they don't want to wait for the cron
> task to happen. WDYT?
This sounds great, but don't know if it should block this series.
Perhaps you can push it to a 'wip-certbot' branch on Savannah for easier
access and testing?
Also, hopefully some of our newfound Shepherd experts can chime in on
this thread :)
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 7 years and 82 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.