GNU bug report logs -
#30457
26.0.91; bidi-display-reordering makes navigation around melpa/archive-contents slow
Previous Next
Reported by: Aaron Jensen <aaronjensen <at> gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 16:51:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Merged with 3219,
4123,
9589,
13675,
15555,
18530,
22143,
24523,
32523,
40007
Found in versions 23.1, 24.2, 24.2.93, 24.3, 24.5, 26.0.91, 27.0.50, 28.0.50
Fixed in version 29.1
Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:40 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> It's a 870K line with multi-level parentheses. As already mentioned
> there, the BPA implementation that is part of the bidi reordering
> makes this sluggish due to the many parentheses in such a long line.
Yes, it's also a real use-case that I encountered today while trying
to figure out why a package was getting installed (I'm sure there's a
better way to do this... but that's not the point). It's not just line
scrolling, it's most any manipulation/navigation of the buffer. Emacs
has definitely sped up in the last year and I'm quite pleased with
that, but this is still one area that it's rather sluggish. I do
experience sluggishness in other instances as well with long lines,
but this is the example I have today.
> (However, it's nowhere near 13 sec on my box.
Are you on a mac? It seems we're slower than linux still... Is there a
way to check to see if I was compiled w/ optimizations? I used the
emacs-plus recipe on homebrew.
> And going several lines
> in one go, as in "C-u 20 C-n", makes it even faster.)
Sure, but everything has a latency and these sort of workaround don't
really solve the overall feel problem. It feels like I'm working over
ssh to a server in another country and the difference when bidi is
disabled is incredible.
> Beware: the code which is used when bidi-display-reordering is nil is
> unsupported since Emacs 24, so you are on your own when using it. I
> urge you to reconsider.
I didn't know this, I'm not sure what it means in practice. Perhaps
I'll turn it back to t for now and just have that in my bag of tricks
if I encounter a file that has this problem.
Thanks,
Aaron
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 299 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.