GNU bug report logs -
#3035
23.0.92; doc, terminology for graphics, display, terminal, etc.
Previous Next
Reported by: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:40:07 UTC
Severity: minor
Done: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #45 received at 3035 <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):
> From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
> Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 00:52:08 -0700
>
> > > 2. In the Elisp manual, I see the use of terms such as "graphical
> > > terminal", "graphicical display" (also "graphics display"),
> > > "(non-)graphics-capable display", "text terminals" (opposed to
> > > graphical), "graphic characters", and "graphical
> > > attributes", without any real explanation or definition.
> >
> > From the node "Frames", near the beginning:
> >
> > There are two classes of terminals: text-only terminals and
> > graphical terminals. Text-only terminals are non-graphics-capable
> > display devices, including "terminal emulators" such as xterm. On
> > text-only terminals, each frame occupies the entire
> > terminal screen;
> > although you can create additional frames and switch
> > between them, only
> > one frame can be shown at any given time. We refer to frames on
> > text-only terminals as "terminal frames". Graphical
> > terminals, on the
> > other hand, are graphics-capable windowing systems, such as the X
> > Window System. On a graphical terminal, Emacs can
> > display multiple
> > frames simultaneously. We refer to such frames as
> > "window frames".
> >
> > If this is not good enough, please tell what is missing.
>
> Yes, that helps wrt "graphical terminal" and "text terminal" (but not with the
> rest).
But that's what your Item 2 (above) was all about: the distinction
between text and graphical terminals. What else is needed?
> (BTW, in my version, it says "On these "multi-monitor" setups, a single DISPLAY
> value controls the output to all the physical monitors.")
My citation was from today's CVS.
> BTW, I see in passing this, in node Multiple Displays: "_the_ selected frame".
> Is it normal that those underscores are shown as such?
That's how emphasis is shown in Info. In print, it comes out in
slanted typeface.
> > They are not. Each one should be explained in its own place, and the
> > more important ones, although certainly not all, are in the Glossary
> > node.
>
> I see. That's good.
>
> How do I get to the Glossary node? I tried `g Glossary' and got no match. I
> tried `C-h m' and `?' and looked for "Glossary" in the Info mode help and
> summary, but didn't find it in either.
Sorry, I mean the Glossary in the Emacs manual, not in ELisp.
This bug report was last modified 14 years and 31 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.