GNU bug report logs - #30349
27.0.50; Cuonfusing documentation about pipe processes

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Philipp <p.stephani2 <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 16:30:02 UTC

Severity: minor

Tags: fixed, patch

Found in version 27.0.50

Fixed in version 26.1

Done: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #22 received at 30349 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob <at> tcd.ie>
To: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: 30349 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, p.stephani2 <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#30349: 27.0.50; Cuonfusing documentation about pipe processes
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 16:31:35 +0000
Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net> writes:

> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
>>> From: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net>
>>> Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 19:53:12 -0500
>>> Cc: 30349 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>>> 
>>> > ":buffer BUFFER -- BUFFER is the buffer (or buffer-name) to associate
>>> > with the process.  Process output goes at the end of that buffer,
>>> > unless you specify an output stream or filter function to handle the
>>> > output."
>>> >
>>> > => How do you specify an output stream?
>>> 
>>> I don't think there is such a thing.  That phrase seems to have been
>>> copied across all the make-*-process functions.
>>
>> And is wrong in all of them?
>
> I think so.
>
>> Could it be that the phrase originally meant shell-style redirection?
>
> Perhaps, but none of those functions support that, as far as I know.

No relation to '(elisp) Output Streams'?

-- 
Basil




This bug report was last modified 7 years and 163 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.