GNU bug report logs - #30331
Neither Emacs nor Vim nor Nano handle ligature literal insertion well

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Andrew Pennebaker <andrew.pennebaker <at> gmail.com>

Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 22:32:01 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Merged with 475, 36914

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Richard Stallman <rms <at> gnu.org>
To: Andrew Pennebaker <andrew.pennebaker <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 30331 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#30331: Neither Emacs nor Vim nor Nano handle ligature literal insertion well
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2018 14:13:12 -0500
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

  > However, traditional text editors
  > including Emacs, Vim, and Nano are evidently NOT able to handle a literal æ
  > rune insertion, and tend to raise a generic error message when the text
  > expander application attempts to insert this key.

I'd expect that Quail input methods could handle this for Emacs.  They
notice when you enter a' and convert it to á, so they could notice ae
and convert it to æ.

When you want separate a and e, you'd type another e.



-- 
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (https://gnu.org, https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See https://stallman.org/skype.html.





This bug report was last modified 5 years and 258 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.