From unknown Thu Aug 14 17:26:54 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#30129 <30129@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#30129 <30129@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 25.3; ibuffer sorting order does not return to normal after using `ibuffer-invert-sorting' twice Reply-To: bug#30129 <30129@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 00:26:54 +0000 retitle 30129 25.3; ibuffer sorting order does not return to normal after u= sing `ibuffer-invert-sorting' twice reassign 30129 emacs submitter 30129 Windy Tusooa severity 30129 minor tag 30129 fixed thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 15 11:16:43 2018 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jan 2018 16:16:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57680 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eb7RC-0006CG-Iw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 11:16:43 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33532) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eb6BA-0002Q7-3G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 09:56:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eb6B3-0007mA-8o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 09:55:58 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,HTML_MESSAGE, RECEIVED_FROM_WINDOWS_HOST autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:41901) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eb6B3-0007m0-4f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 09:55:57 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52735) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eb6B1-0002BP-FE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 09:55:56 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eb6Ax-0007kc-HS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 09:55:55 -0500 Received: from mail-oln040092000025.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.92.0.25]:35631 helo=NAM01-BN3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eb6Ax-0007kE-Av for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 09:55:51 -0500 Received: from BN3NAM01FT048.eop-nam01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.66.55) by BN3NAM01HT212.eop-nam01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.66.76) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.20.345.12; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 14:55:49 +0000 Received: from SC1P215MB0431.LAMP215.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (10.152.66.51) by BN3NAM01FT048.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.66.124) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.20.345.12 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 14:55:49 +0000 Received: from SC1P215MB0431.LAMP215.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([10.165.96.145]) by SC1P215MB0431.LAMP215.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([10.165.96.145]) with mapi id 15.20.0407.009; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 14:55:49 +0000 From: Windy Tusooa To: "bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org" Subject: 25.3; ibuffer sorting order does not return to normal after using `ibuffer-invert-sorting' twice Thread-Topic: 25.3; ibuffer sorting order does not return to normal after using `ibuffer-invert-sorting' twice Thread-Index: AQHTjhCGh8guftOUUkeuiQ/L1e0f6g== Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 14:55:49 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:F1AE9751F9ABDD9221ED48DE1577B43F0F404309EEB5B91C758D4A6594C65818; UpperCasedChecksum:C33CCAF00F77F54CC52976C424B51F1B341FD202E22BDFB6F378F70C5B4ECBF5; SizeAsReceived:6936; Count:44 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-tmn: [qiesJKS+JgwLdk/NhvkFEkBWAt5Vq3Bz] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN3NAM01HT212; 6:o4/X1jeUYxU1Guc3+kfRfctRoIIj5zb7BnL81y4FZFl1n41jHLm5/jE9DMx2Utx7ATu0SU0vKuGftnJN11GWfsAGModqHbEvIrbqhwlKguOZLJu0fhoboEw/IMbV6nWqXCnBxwt/E+y0gitDikVvCLCKnbce6a6erIuZCOQhw18WYE8U/wb+hzk7sOWRgR34/P5Z+msGuVAesWSqQnbco3ELPovT7YjtA+WB+7jDNIcxWLLVlHkPiiByuWNcr33b5TpCNSrm19hKurntXOM9xhIE+7pjK8T2FdXCPhArj0W/yPsr3UsmzGKMHkKAEmgAX9SENIVydMSDA1jhV8/luRU46fJgCd7/PiXO0vNfRrg=; 5:rQbfcRSILixAtzmU442AkVS4OtAjnD95JX5fB3OEE5o7KPgBds3NXsMyIktkFFwwH1zLKCsGxEO5HsTgxC2YY4P14zkRYNNB9RZJJ7AN/Z2UC6cT0sk0ZDHrTYN5gDktRUj8l/3k8/Z4RFQ4lZ8or2FyJcWB5b+y1KVANR7K0LY=; 24:Z42qwzsWCI4Bx4t+ybXcF68MNEAp49tkt6PH3xT/H5Dv+xEtc8MbpyPYbmtmQdptjiL1efAOVAf2909O4wYAnvPzFkgOI+6sQjAgXLMN6lE=; 7:7XzjYaflG7D6vdOPfVVsI7YNyYCo5+QjuCVkVfOQ6MSMjLhhXUc+p8GEjo+N54il9Pn/HAgl8w6eptvMtiG7DvUx1lScnGoyu6RXGdmNXv5nIodBKBRTEia7kE+D105qAoGbegzw37mnv/d3GTDZddCO8ohcc035Dbai/2z4nFWTt+IYYn0Z2wkrzpCqAKgfiCLqxw74kRckllO9BHBLkwlV4bqKtO0mlfZNc47Ep+kQvH598da0aOaFrlKZi5u3 x-incomingheadercount: 44 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(201702061074)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031324274)(2017031323274)(2017031322404)(1603101448)(1601125374)(1701031045); SRVR:BN3NAM01HT212; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN3NAM01HT212: x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: c554d300-25c1-460a-5f47-08d55c2810b1 x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(444000031); SRVR:BN3NAM01HT212; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000803101)(100110400095); SRVR:BN3NAM01HT212; x-forefront-prvs: 0553CBB77A x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(7070007)(98901004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3NAM01HT212; H:SC1P215MB0431.LAMP215.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_SC1P215MB04311F2950C0C1974C51B17CA7EB0SC1P215MB0431LAMP_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: c554d300-25c1-460a-5f47-08d55c2810b1 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 15 Jan 2018 14:55:49.0518 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3NAM01HT212 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Windows 7 or 8 [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 11:16:41 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) --_000_SC1P215MB04311F2950C0C1974C51B17CA7EB0SC1P215MB0431LAMP_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Severity: normal In ibuffer-mode, the command `ibuffer-invert-sorting=92 reverse the order o= f buffers. But when the command is used the second time, the order does not= return to normal. In GNU Emacs 25.3.1 (x86_64-w64-mingw32) of 2017-09-27 built on LAPHROAIG Windowing system distributor 'Microsoft Corp.', version 10.0.15063 Configured using: 'configure --without-dbus --without-compress-install 'CFLAGS=3D-O2 -static -g3' PKG_CONFIG_PATH=3D/mingw64/lib/pkgconfig' Configured features: XPM JPEG TIFF GIF PNG RSVG SOUND NOTIFY ACL GNUTLS LIBXML2 ZLIB TOOLKIT_SCROLL_BARS Important settings: value of $LANG: CHS locale-coding-system: cp936 Major mode: IBuffer Minor modes in effect: tooltip-mode: t global-eldoc-mode: t electric-indent-mode: t mouse-wheel-mode: t tool-bar-mode: t menu-bar-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t font-lock-mode: t blink-cursor-mode: t auto-composition-mode: t auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t buffer-read-only: t line-number-mode: t transient-mark-mode: t Recent messages: Formats have changed, recompiling...done Updating buffer list...done Commands: m, u, t, RET, g, k, S, D, Q; q to quit; h for help Sorting order reversed Sorting order normal Sorting order reversed Sorting order normal Making completion list... Quit Making completion list... Load-path shadows: None found. Features: (shadow sort mail-extr emacsbug message dired format-spec rfc822 mml mml-sec password-cache epg epg-config gnus-util mm-decode mm-bodies mm-encode mail-parse rfc2231 mailabbrev gmm-utils mailheader sendmail rfc2047 rfc2045 ietf-drums mm-util help-fns help-mode easymenu cl-loaddefs pcase cl-lib mail-prsvr mail-utils ibuf-ext ibuffer time-date mule-util china-util tooltip eldoc electric uniquify ediff-hook vc-hooks lisp-float-type mwheel dos-w32 ls-lisp disp-table w32-win w32-vars term/common-win tool-bar dnd fontset image regexp-opt fringe tabulated-list newcomment elisp-mode lisp-mode prog-mode register page menu-bar rfn-eshadow timer select scroll-bar mouse jit-lock font-lock syntax facemenu font-core frame cl-generic cham georgian utf-8-lang misc-lang vietnamese tibetan thai tai-viet lao korean japanese eucjp-ms cp51932 hebrew greek romanian slovak czech european ethiopic indian cyrillic chinese charscript case-table epa-hook jka-cmpr-hook help simple abbrev minibuffer cl-preloaded nadvice loaddefs button faces cus-face macroexp files text-properties overlay sha1 md5 base64 format env code-pages mule custom widget hashtable-print-readable backquote w32notify w32 multi-tty make-network-process emacs) Memory information: ((conses 16 95668 11237) (symbols 56 20053 0) (miscs 48 55 117) (strings 32 17286 3515) (string-bytes 1 471856) (vectors 16 13646) (vector-slots 8 489273 9496) (floats 8 160 60) (intervals 56 403 0) (buffers 976 19)) --_000_SC1P215MB04311F2950C0C1974C51B17CA7EB0SC1P215MB0431LAMP_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

 

Severity: normal

 

In ibuffer-mode, the command `i= buffer-invert-sorting=92 reverse the order of buffers. But when the command= is used the second time, the order does not return to normal.

 

 

In GNU Emacs 25.3.1 (x86_64-w64= -mingw32)

of 2017-09-27 built on LAPHROAI= G

Windowing system distributor 'M= icrosoft Corp.', version 10.0.15063

Configured using:

'configure --without-dbus --wit= hout-compress-install 'CFLAGS=3D-O2

-static -g3' PKG_CONFIG_PATH=3D= /mingw64/lib/pkgconfig'

 

Configured features:

XPM JPEG TIFF GIF PNG RSVG SOUN= D NOTIFY ACL GNUTLS LIBXML2 ZLIB

TOOLKIT_SCROLL_BARS

 

Important settings:

  value of $LANG: CHS

  locale-coding-system: cp= 936

 

Major mode: IBuffer

 

Minor modes in effect:

  tooltip-mode: t

  global-eldoc-mode: t

  electric-indent-mode: t<= /span>

  mouse-wheel-mode: t

  tool-bar-mode: t<= /p>

  menu-bar-mode: t<= /p>

  file-name-shadow-mode: t=

  global-font-lock-mode: t=

  font-lock-mode: t=

  blink-cursor-mode: t

  auto-composition-mode: t=

  auto-encryption-mode: t<= /span>

  auto-compression-mode: t=

  buffer-read-only: t

  line-number-mode: t

  transient-mark-mode: t

 

Recent messages:

Formats have changed, recompili= ng...done

Updating buffer list...done

Commands: m, u, t, RET, g, k, S= , D, Q; q to quit; h for help

Sorting order reversed

Sorting order normal

Sorting order reversed

Sorting order normal

Making completion list...

Quit

Making completion list...

 

Load-path shadows:

None found.

 

Features:

(shadow sort mail-extr emacsbug= message dired format-spec rfc822 mml

mml-sec password-cache epg epg-= config gnus-util mm-decode mm-bodies

mm-encode mail-parse rfc2231 ma= ilabbrev gmm-utils mailheader sendmail

rfc2047 rfc2045 ietf-drums mm-u= til help-fns help-mode easymenu

cl-loaddefs pcase cl-lib mail-p= rsvr mail-utils ibuf-ext ibuffer

time-date mule-util china-util = tooltip eldoc electric uniquify

ediff-hook vc-hooks lisp-float-= type mwheel dos-w32 ls-lisp disp-table

w32-win w32-vars term/common-wi= n tool-bar dnd fontset image regexp-opt

fringe tabulated-list newcommen= t elisp-mode lisp-mode prog-mode register

page menu-bar rfn-eshadow timer= select scroll-bar mouse jit-lock

font-lock syntax facemenu font-= core frame cl-generic cham georgian

utf-8-lang misc-lang vietnamese= tibetan thai tai-viet lao korean

japanese eucjp-ms cp51932 hebre= w greek romanian slovak czech european

ethiopic indian cyrillic chines= e charscript case-table epa-hook

jka-cmpr-hook help simple abbre= v minibuffer cl-preloaded nadvice

loaddefs button faces cus-face = macroexp files text-properties overlay

sha1 md5 base64 format env code= -pages mule custom widget

hashtable-print-readable backqu= ote w32notify w32 multi-tty

make-network-process emacs)

 

Memory information:

((conses 16 95668 11237)=

(symbols 56 20053 0)

(miscs 48 55 117)

(strings 32 17286 3515)<= /p>

(string-bytes 1 471856)<= /p>

(vectors 16 13646)

(vector-slots 8 489273 9496)

(floats 8 160 60)

(intervals 56 403 0)

(buffers 976 19))

 

--_000_SC1P215MB04311F2950C0C1974C51B17CA7EB0SC1P215MB0431LAMP_-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jan 17 04:58:38 2018 Received: (at 30129) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jan 2018 09:58:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59424 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ebkUQ-0002Sn-1h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 04:58:38 -0500 Received: from mail-oln040092007099.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.92.7.99]:5408 helo=NAM03-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ebkUM-0002SZ-FF for 30129@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 04:58:34 -0500 Received: from BY2NAM03FT030.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.84.53) by BY2NAM03HT100.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.85.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.345.19; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 09:58:28 +0000 Received: from CP2P215MB0420.LAMP215.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (10.152.84.60) by BY2NAM03FT030.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.84.214) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.345.19 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 09:58:28 +0000 Received: from CP2P215MB0420.LAMP215.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([10.171.206.138]) by CP2P215MB0420.LAMP215.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([10.171.206.138]) with mapi id 15.20.0428.014; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 09:58:26 +0000 From: Windy Tusooa To: "30129@debbugs.gnu.org" <30129@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Thread-Index: AQHTj3m35BE9HKsDBkK/HjS1YS0GzA== Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 09:58:26 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:E5C11BBF50A1BBB92D0C35606A671494D86F871780280DA287F5EB370EF57EBB; UpperCasedChecksum:6DC364F742D75133FD595888BDA1E06DD533562F5C9C347E4CF33625854F2B31; SizeAsReceived:6729; Count:43 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-tmn: [JV+E4LPFAz/8MgHuFkSie5WEsRQ2nhuI] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY2NAM03HT100; 6:uo+gFVh5kyWP9ViQLpPYinaZ/xnHoiYtb45lJ3zXDoniD8zhWxRn0NZUG0pj5XIGs+RL+OrVW7XP6ZjEMKbaLKj/qZVfoXkdiMnYtCZBTyJMJJuyoLONYYPbDbdZsIi+mbSjaJLLoeishnm4Izm10mH1PlH8fFhDhqPO8Ih7FyUrkxC8u3KcY8bviQrI15nL1Pq9dAi65NehGPBIRKWmxgWl3ByCpANHzIwXWltP69oBMOlXTw2iIuQ5zBkd2GsL0lXIDt/t83EGu+42SlTNaNGz0djAWeTU2sOmEm3TDeJukfeRmCN94YADN7c/okGYZlt1yO5P9UTfLDjiFGFvc5FjjMMyw97O5IqDvFaorfQ=; 5:8gx4TMp/8bVYLMyJdfWxSRhW78gsPasVV7cFGpsgI1Om300eul4Y+kceQAiPFFczvaBblAecPqolJrRgIA0usl8tXb7452MoVVRs/0FV2U15DBg2cIIcsbErDGPMwj8TUhAUdTQr1vc7A1WBC6J12VNW+i9dnl72tzzVTtPtEMo=; 24:dsgcdffM/TR/uDpSwotmCOCy1GyvnY4Kv4EQMInMfMwVJt+nZJ4/dE/MSS7rXhWYM3EP3KTlFaGj/CaHl7PIQt+VK2NkXSuo3joV0cL+Ypo=; 7:3oN4/O+R6yxyCeziYl3b1EK9NRPjAxtHDRGDkqwVS8juq4Ikd91hzuZSUoE2XPH1aEfoeXr7bux6crFENjmjpJC/yFIMLe8mIETUjGTJ6xHnxX5U1o2sqh80KH5ErBlyiPL6OLFtbcyHgwfRPvXeOWfyTxxPTdnruR/vazK/6FqiBw/1U7xU/772e3HUXkkLbxU7ioKY8NfTeYOuMEuoZAEYzd+QpzZL2yynjeC0nwjVsLsnV08RPwPcgQi+zgQS x-incomingheadercount: 43 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(201702061074)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031324274)(2017031323274)(2017031322404)(1603101448)(1601125374)(1701031045); SRVR:BY2NAM03HT100; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BY2NAM03HT100: x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: c82956c6-c9ba-4fc4-0af4-08d55d90da80 x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(444000031); SRVR:BY2NAM03HT100; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000803101)(100110400095); SRVR:BY2NAM03HT100; x-forefront-prvs: 0555EC8317 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(7070007)(98901004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2NAM03HT100; H:CP2P215MB0420.LAMP215.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CP2P215MB0420AF9A4EFD340024321525A7E90CP2P215MB0420LAMP_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: c82956c6-c9ba-4fc4-0af4-08d55d90da80 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 17 Jan 2018 09:58:26.4822 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2NAM03HT100 X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: It happens only when sorting by recency. Does ibuffer re-visit the buffers when re-displaying them? It happens only when sorting by recency. Does ibuffer re-visit the buffers when re-displaying them? [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [40.92.7.99 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 30129 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: It happens only when sorting by recency. Does ibuffer re-visit the buffers when re-displaying them? It happens only when sorting by recency. Does ibuffer re-visit the buffers when re-displaying them? [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [40.92.7.99 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty --_000_CP2P215MB0420AF9A4EFD340024321525A7E90CP2P215MB0420LAMP_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It happens only when sorting by recency. Does ibuffer re-visit the buffers = when re-displaying them? --_000_CP2P215MB0420AF9A4EFD340024321525A7E90CP2P215MB0420LAMP_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
It happens only when sorting by recency. Doe= s ibuffer re-visit the buffers when re-displaying them? 
--_000_CP2P215MB0420AF9A4EFD340024321525A7E90CP2P215MB0420LAMP_-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 04 06:33:03 2021 Received: (at 30129) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2021 11:33:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39923 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7csh-0006zA-3c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 06:33:03 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:56514) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7csf-0006yd-Ao for 30129@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 06:33:01 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=KHrMvzw+xTk6SVVYIEN4F9DkCxs62KAXS7RFEu8/Gqg=; b=GL9Xcv2JvLps3h+6a30VvAid8L b9BxZXVocRdllFYPt26EeGeKpzJy7T7yBXhplY6Ecy9CgiTt7MxAo7UL1Mue/xp904cf2RLocGDWJ YAQx8HGqnCzkQY6HESuYKbwPVOARvW63unN2fnWpsnRx+zzbdJwSQgSt7BrKP2ZVSvqw=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l7csN-0006XV-PT; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 12:32:54 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Windy Tusooa Subject: Re: bug#30129: 25.3; ibuffer sorting order does not return to normal after using `ibuffer-invert-sorting' twice References: X-Now-Playing: Mia Doi Todd & Turn On The Sunlight's _Happy Earth Day 2015_: "Mother Nature" Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 12:32:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Windy Tusooa's message of "Mon, 15 Jan 2018 14:55:49 +0000") Message-ID: <877dnorrtx.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Windy Tusooa writes: > In ibuffer-mode, the command `ibuffer-invert-sorting’ reverse the > order of buffers. But when the command is used the second time, the > order does not return to normal. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 30129 Cc: 30129@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Windy Tusooa writes: > In ibuffer-mode, the command `ibuffer-invert-sorting=E2=80=99 reverse the > order of buffers. But when the command is used the second time, the > order does not return to normal. If you call it three times, it does return to normal. :-) Until you hit `g' again. This should now work better in Emacs 28. --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 04 06:33:10 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2021 11:33:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39926 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7cso-0006zW-B4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 06:33:10 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:56530) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7csn-0006zI-22 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 06:33:09 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=pZSUHCf07Namgb1ihiUbBFdxDdMJsAQYqW5g68tTqgc=; b=mbSYMPvoPC6+v4/B8jcQZCWkyz gowy8Ecni8d0uSy1MlzQvRW9GieVnXhlxC5CsXRPmwfnQi/OTaeMGKiL+/fRrdj63QC2G4676VKvB V4qjkadMsVXuIeeGy2pPM0mQ4jLRbqY+7DEBVWIkIMC4RGYR0Oj9+fM4z3AkwxBsNu+I=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l7csf-0006Xk-92 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 12:33:03 +0100 Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 12:33:00 +0100 Message-Id: <875z38rrtf.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #30129 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 30129 fixed close 30129 28.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 30129 fixed close 30129 28.1 quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 04 07:00:31 2021 Received: (at 30129) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2021 12:00:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40085 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7dJG-0001RL-SE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 07:00:31 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:56780) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7dJC-0001R3-If for 30129@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 07:00:29 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Z3KgUg1nzycFaRvSgl97QNC6wSI9Yz1Z+W8OUq2YJIM=; b=oZFLq73BT0sb62whg7b/Z+PsHj aNhS0IlNdp/dyXlxgGtC2sfkxqWywj157IgaCd7YPAFfqqBnxEZHYpaXv0+ju/WI17y4+hBPQHM3K dXJDQ5jKABl/AqvR/ne4NWHE11T3C+GXZJtBj8jlJbyLwA/SqIidQmOR7FFtv6b3XLoA=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l7dJ3-0006tO-Oa; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 13:00:20 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Windy Tusooa Subject: Re: bug#30129: 25.3; ibuffer sorting order does not return to normal after using `ibuffer-invert-sorting' twice References: <877dnorrtx.fsf@gnus.org> X-Now-Playing: Debby Friday's _Bitchpunk_: "MEDUSA" Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 13:00:16 +0100 In-Reply-To: <877dnorrtx.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 04 Feb 2021 12:32:42 +0100") Message-ID: <87zh0kqbzj.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Windy Tusooa writes: > >> In ibuffer-mode, the command `ibuffer-invert-sorting’ reverse the >> order of buffers. But when the command is used the second time, the >> order does [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 30129 Cc: 30129@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Windy Tusooa writes: > >> In ibuffer-mode, the command `ibuffer-invert-sorting=E2=80=99 reverse the >> order of buffers. But when the command is used the second time, the >> order does not return to normal. > > If you call it three times, it does return to normal. :-) Until you > hit `g' again. > > This should now work better in Emacs 28. Uhm, not really -- the problem is that every time ibuffer-redisplay is called, the order is inverted... since there is no explicit `recency' sorter. I've now added such a sorter, and that fixes the problem. However, this effectively reverts e782065477917c10759d618e43b2ec18330ffae3, which made calling `ibuffer-do-sort-by-recency' twice (permanently) reverse the sorting order... which I think is pretty odd, since there's already a command for that. --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Thu Aug 14 17:26:54 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator