GNU bug report logs -
#30113
SVN checkouts without descriptive file names
Previous Next
Reported by: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 16:04:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Here is the lint log, it did not run to completion, it has an error at the
end.
2018-01-14 18:43 GMT+01:00 Gábor Boskovits <boskovits <at> gmail.com>:
> Ok, I started a guix lint on 0.14.0.1183-1b321.
> Will attach log here asap.
>
>
> 2018-01-14 17:53 GMT+01:00 Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>:
>
>> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 17:43:27 +0100
>> Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr> wrote:
>>
>> > Gábor Boskovits wrote on 14/01/18 at 17:13:
>> > > Maybe we could use guix to check for these, and some
>> > > other things could also be spotted.
>> > > WDYT?
>> >
>> > Agreed, I think.
>>
>> Yeah, +1
>>
>> > We should be able to improve the quality of these guesses: the
>> > repository URI is about as likely to be foo://bar/<package>... as a
>> > regular tarball URI.
>> >
>> > Or we make a file-name mandatory for certain methods.
>>
>> I agree that some heuristics to figure out the file-name from
>> (svn-reference-url ref) would be nice.
>>
>> It's not that important that the store filenames are meaningful to
>> humans, it's just nice-to-have. So I'd say heuristic it and be done with
>> it.
>>
>> On second thought, maybe even default file-name to the Guix package name
>> (if possible at this point in Guix). The hash value will make it unique
>> regardless (for example if there are multiple svn-download blocks in the
>> same package)
>>
>
>
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
[lint-log (application/octet-stream, attachment)]
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 143 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.