GNU bug report logs - #30113
SVN checkouts without descriptive file names

Previous Next

Full log

Message #20 received at 30113 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Gábor Boskovits <boskovits <at> gmail.com>
To: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>
Cc: 30113 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>,
 Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Subject: Re: bug#30113: SVN checkouts without descriptive file names
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 18:43:55 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Ok, I started a guix lint on 0.14.0.1183-1b321.
Will attach log here asap.


2018-01-14 17:53 GMT+01:00 Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>:

> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 17:43:27 +0100
> Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr> wrote:
>
> > Gábor Boskovits wrote on 14/01/18 at 17:13:
> > > Maybe we could use guix to check for these, and some
> > > other things could also be spotted.
> > > WDYT?
> >
> > Agreed, I think.
>
> Yeah, +1
>
> > We should be able to improve the quality of these guesses: the
> > repository URI is about as likely to be foo://bar/<package>... as a
> > regular tarball URI.
> >
> > Or we make a file-name mandatory for certain methods.
>
> I agree that some heuristics to figure out the file-name from
> (svn-reference-url ref) would be nice.
>
> It's not that important that the store filenames are meaningful to humans,
> it's just nice-to-have.  So I'd say heuristic it and be done with it.
>
> On second thought, maybe even default file-name to the Guix package name
> (if possible at this point in Guix).  The hash value will make it unique
> regardless (for example if there are multiple svn-download blocks in the
> same package)
>

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.