GNU bug report logs - #30097
[core-updates] nspr 4.17 not reproducible

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Gábor Boskovits <boskovits <at> gmail.com>
Subject: bug#30097: closed (Re: bug#30097: [core-updates] nspr 4.17 not
 reproducible)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 16:21:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#30097: [core-updates] nspr 4.17 not reproducible

which was filed against the guix package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 30097 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
30097: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=30097
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
To: Gábor Boskovits <boskovits <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 30097-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#30097: [core-updates] nspr 4.17 not reproducible
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 17:20:35 +0100

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

Gábor Boskovits <boskovits <at> gmail.com> writes:

> 2018-01-14 20:51 GMT+01:00 Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>:
>
>> Gábor Boskovits <boskovits <at> gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > 2018-01-14 19:28 GMT+01:00 Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>:
>> >
>> >> Gábor Boskovits <boskovits <at> gmail.com> writes:
>> >>
>> >> > nspr 4.17 is not reproducible.
>> >> > Diffoscope output attached.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for the report!
>> >>
>> >> The attached patch should solve it.  Since there are quite a few
>> >> dependent packages, I'd like to push this to a new 'staging' branch that
>> >> will be started shortly after the core-updates merge.  WDYT?
>> >>
>> >> Yes, it should go to a branch.
>> >
>> > I also don't know if this fixes the difference also, where an additional
>> ;
>> > is present...
>> > Could you check this, or should I run a test with the patch?
>> > It seems like a 2 byte difference.
>>
>> It passes `guix build --rounds=2`, so I'm not sure what was up with that
>> ";".
>>
>
> Most probably it is some kind of checksum which includes the timestamp.
> If it passes "guix build --rounds=2" it should be fine.
> Thanks for the clarification.

I pushed this to a new 'staging' branch based off core-updates.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Gábor Boskovits <boskovits <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: [core-updates] nspr 4.17 not reproducible
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2018 17:23:29 +0100

[Message part 6 (text/plain, inline)]

nspr 4.17 is not reproducible.
Diffoscope output attached.

[Message part 7 (text/html, inline)]

[nspr-diffoscope (application/octet-stream, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.