GNU bug report logs - #30034
[PATCH] Update guile-bytestructures to 1.0.1.

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 30034 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 30034 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Amirouche Boubekki <amirouche <at> hypermove.net>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] Update guile-bytestructures to 1.0.1.
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2018 23:53:59 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Becarful guix depends on guile-git which depends on 
guile-bytestructures.

[0001-gnu-guile-bytestructures-Update-to-1.0.1.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]

Message #8 received at 30034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Amirouche Boubekki <amirouche <at> hypermove.net>
To: 30034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Guix-patches <guix-patches-bounces+amirouche=hypermove.net <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [bug#30034] [PATCH] Update guile-bytestructures to 1.0.1.
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2018 23:59:35 +0100

Le 2018-01-08 23:53, Amirouche Boubekki a écrit :
> Becarful guix depends on guile-git which depends on 
> guile-bytestructures.

I am not sure which tests I must run to make sure guix is not broken.
Let me know, what manual tests are required.

Message #11 received at 30034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Amirouche Boubekki <amirouche <at> hypermove.net>
To: 30034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#30034] [PATCH] Update guile-bytestructures to 1.0.1.
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 00:17:57 +0100

Le 2018-01-08 23:59, Amirouche Boubekki a écrit :
> Le 2018-01-08 23:53, Amirouche Boubekki a écrit :
>> Becarful guix depends on guile-git which depends on 
>> guile-bytestructures.
> 
> I am not sure which tests I must run to make sure guix is not broken.
> Let me know, what manual tests are required.

I managed to install 'guix' with the new 'guile-bytestructures'
and 'guix pull' works.

Message #14 received at 30034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ng0 <ng0 <at> n0.is>
To: Amirouche Boubekki <amirouche <at> hypermove.net>
Cc: 30034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#30034] [PATCH] Update guile-bytestructures to 1.0.1.
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 23:25:24 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Amirouche Boubekki transcribed 0.4K bytes:
> Le 2018-01-08 23:59, Amirouche Boubekki a écrit :
> > Le 2018-01-08 23:53, Amirouche Boubekki a écrit :
> > > Becarful guix depends on guile-git which depends on
> > > guile-bytestructures.
> > 
> > I am not sure which tests I must run to make sure guix is not broken.
> > Let me know, what manual tests are required.
> 
> I managed to install 'guix' with the new 'guile-bytestructures'
> and 'guix pull' works.

I'm sceptic about the change of the build system together with the update.
There must be a reason we used trivial-build-system in Guix, or is it
just that the software had no proper tooling for builds until 1.0 and 1.0.1?
-- 
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://c.n0.is/ng0_pubkeys/tree/keys
  WWW: https://n0.is/a/  ::  https://ea.n0.is

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #17 received at 30034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Amirouche Boubekki <amirouche <at> hypermove.net>
To: ng0 <ng0 <at> n0.is>
Cc: 30034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#30034] [PATCH] Update guile-bytestructures to 1.0.1.
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 09:05:53 +0100

On 2018-01-09 00:25, ng0 wrote:

> 
> I'm sceptic about the change of the build system together with the 
> update.
> There must be a reason we used trivial-build-system in Guix, or is it
> just that the software had no proper tooling for builds until 1.0 and 
> 1.0.1?

The project was non autotols previously. It's the first patch
that can use it.

Message #20 received at 30034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ng0 <ng0 <at> n0.is>
To: Amirouche Boubekki <amirouche <at> hypermove.net>
Cc: 30034 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, ng0 <ng0 <at> n0.is>
Subject: Re: [bug#30034] [PATCH] Update guile-bytestructures to 1.0.1.
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 09:08:17 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Amirouche Boubekki transcribed 0.3K bytes:
> On 2018-01-09 00:25, ng0 wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I'm sceptic about the change of the build system together with the
> > update.
> > There must be a reason we used trivial-build-system in Guix, or is it
> > just that the software had no proper tooling for builds until 1.0 and
> > 1.0.1?
> 
> The project was non autotols previously. It's the first patch
> that can use it.
> 

I see. Okay, then it's okay.

Thanks.
-- 
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://c.n0.is/ng0_pubkeys/tree/keys
  WWW: https://n0.is/a/  ::  https://ea.n0.is

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #25 received at 30034-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Amirouche Boubekki <amirouche <at> hypermove.net>
Cc: 30034-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#30034] [PATCH] Update guile-bytestructures to 1.0.1.
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 11:32:15 +0100

Amirouche Boubekki <amirouche <at> hypermove.net> skribis:

> From c7a3daeb78b2085034f8b8a06dcd4340606c7a9d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: amirouche <amirouche+dev <at> hypermove.net>
> Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 22:30:10 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: guile-bytestructures: Update to 1.0.1.
>
> * gnu/package/guile.scm (guile-bytestructures): Update to 1.0.1.
>   [source]: use tarball from github instead of git.
>   [build-system] use gnu build system.
>   [arguments] no specific arguments required.
>   [navitve-inputs] add pkg-config.

I adjusted the commit log and applied, thanks!

Ludo'.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.