GNU bug report logs - #30
Inconsistent behaviour of display-buffer, pop-to-buffer

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: "Otto Maddox" <ottomaddox <at> fastmail.fm>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: bug#30: Inconsistent behaviour of display-buffer, pop-to-buffer
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 04:27:23 +0000

When running Emacs on either X or Mac OS X:

;; Similar to display-buffer-other-frame, but without all the
;; raise-frame, make-frame-{in,}visible stuff.  The point is to
;; illustrate annoyingly inconsistent behaviour of display-buffer.
(defun my-display-buffer (buf)
  (let ((pop-up-frames t)
        same-window-buffer-names
        same-window-regexps)
    (display-buffer buf t)))

Create but don't display a buffer named "foo":
(get-buffer-create "foo")

Pop up a new frame, selected and WITH focus:
(my-display-buffer "foo")

Go back to the original frame with C-x 5 o

Pop up the "foo" frame, selected but WITHOUT focus this time:
(my-display-buffer "foo")

????

Again, go back to the original frame with C-x 5 o and also do
C-x b foo RET to make "foo" the current buffer.  Two issues this time.
The other "foo" frame is not raised but a new frame is unnecessarily
created (the doc says that pop-up-frames means that visible and
iconified frames should be searched).  Also, the newly created frame
is WITH focus this time:
(my-display-buffer "foo")

The same inconsistent behaviour happens if you substitute
pop-to-buffer for display-buffer in the definition of
my-display-buffer, which seems definitely buggy because the doc for
pop-to-buffer says that it should select the buffer.

In GNU Emacs 22.1.1 (powerpc-apple-darwin8.9.0, Carbon Version 1.6.0)
 of 2007-06-08
-- 
  Otto Maddox
  ottomaddox <at> fastmail.fm

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - The professional email service

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.