GNU bug report logs -
#29846
scroll and fontify takes longer time for file in slow network
Previous Next
Reported by: Shuguang Sun <shuguang <at> gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2017 06:04:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> IRO.UMontreal.CA>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #26 received at 29846 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 12:48 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> > From: Shuguang Sun <shuguang <at> gmail.com>
> > Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2017 17:47:52 +0800
> >
> > Backup, auto-save, and lockfiles has been disabled in .dir-locals
> >
> > ((nil
> > (make-backup-files . nil)
> > (create-lockfiles . nil)
> > (auto-save-default . nil)
> > (auto-save-timeout . 10000)
> > ))
>
> You've disabled file locking, but Emacs still checks whether some
> other Emacs session locked the file. It does that as part of
> restore-buffer-modified-p, which is called by JIT font-lock (because
> fontification makes the buffer modified and JIT font-lock needs to
> undo that after it fontifies a chunk of buffer). Checking whether a
> file is locked entails calling unlock_file, which in turn calls
> read_lock_data, which tries to open the lock file. I'm guessing that
> this is slow on that remote volume of yours.
>
> Maybe we should support a special value of create-lockfiles which
> would mean don't create lockfiles and don't test fro lockfiles created
> by other Emacs sessions.
>
It makes sense. It has a short delayed reponse when I start to modify the
buffer (input, delete, etc.).
It will help single user if we can have a special value of create-lockfiles.
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 7 years and 151 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.