GNU bug report logs - #29810
gnu: maths: Fix cache size detected by openblas on some

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#29810: closed (gnu: maths: Fix cache size detected by
 openblas on some)
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 23:22:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Tue, 12 Feb 2019 18:21:48 -0500
with message-id <20190212232148.GB31772 <at> jasmine.lan>
and subject line Re: [bug#29810] gnu: maths: Fix cache size detected by openblas on some
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #29810,
regarding gnu: maths: Fix cache size detected by openblas on some
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
29810: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=29810
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Dave Love <fx <at> gnu.org>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: gnu: maths: Fix cache size detected by openblas on some
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 13:13:29 +0000

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

This addresses a potential performance problem, fixed in the post-0.2.20
source.  It's intended for application to a package definition updated
to 0.2.20, which Ludo said is in the pipeline.  Apologies that I don't
seem to have converged on an acceptable style for changes.

[0001-gnu-maths-Fix-cache-size-detected-by-openblas-on-som.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Cc: Dave Love <fx <at> gnu.org>, 29810-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#29810] gnu: maths: Fix cache size detected by openblas on
 some
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 18:21:48 -0500

[Message part 6 (text/plain, inline)]

On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 10:43:45AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Thanks for the patch.  Given the number of dependents, we would not push
> it in master (info "(guix) Submitting Patches").  At the same time,
> since 0.2.20 is in core-updates and well on its way, do you think we
> should keep those patches?
> 
> Perhaps in core-updates we could keep both 0.2.19 with these patches and
> 0.2.20 (ISTR you said there were incompatibilities between these two
> versions)?  Would it make sense?

Our openblas package is currently at version 0.3.4. Due to lack of
response from the submitter and the "staleness" of these patches I'm
closing the bug ticket. Please re-open the bug if it is still relevant
to you.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.