GNU bug report logs - #29805
27.0; doc of `tooltip-resize-echo-area'

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>

Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 22:07:01 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: notabug

Found in version 27.0

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #14 received at 29805 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>, 29805 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#29805: 27.0; doc of `tooltip-resize-echo-area'
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 09:33:48 +0100
>> So the question to be
>> answered first is: Do we ever want to fit stand-alone minibuffer
>> frames to their buffers?
>
> Please don't bother for me, anyway. ;-)

If we don't want to, the entire remainder of this discussion is moot.

> The bug report was really to suggest that such doc about
> resizing the space for the minibuffer / echo area should
> not lead people to believe that such resizing resizes a
> frame.  It applies only to a window in a frame that is
> not minibuffer-only (AFAICT), so that should be made clear.

Resizing the echo area when showing a tooltip is just a special case
of resizing the minibuffer window so any reasonable discussion of the
former would have to start with the latter.

>> But the first question that comes to my mind is why we now have the
>> option `tooltip-resize-echo-area' which, according to its doc-string
>> "has effect only on GUI frames" while in Emacs 24.1 we have declared
>> `tooltip-use-echo-area' obsolete and suggested to disable tooltips
>> instead.
>
> 1. No idea why we now have it.
> 2. The doc string is wrong to refer to `tooltip-use-echo-area'.

Which doc string does (2)?

>> Resolved that, we should probably then also say that
>> `tooltip-resize-echo-area' has effect iff `resize-mini-windows' is
>> non-nil.
>
> And why isn't `resize-mini-windows' enough?  Is this about
> resizing ONLY the echo area and not the minibuffer?  (Does
> that even make sense?)
>
> It's all unclear to me.

To me too.  I have no idea why we (or at least an Emacs user) should
ever have to distinguish betweeen echo area and minibuffer.  There's
no practical need for that.

martin




This bug report was last modified 3 years and 260 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.