GNU bug report logs - #29785
[PATCH] Implement separate eww history

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 29785 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, larsi <at> gnus.org
Subject: bug#29785: [PATCH] Implement separate eww history
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 20:01:33 +0100

Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
>> Cc: 29785 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,  larsi <at> gnus.org
>> Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 17:50:34 +0100
>> 
>> >> So do I, but I don't want to elicit any 'how dare you change
>> >> behaviour' comments a year from now.
>> >
>> > The behavior doesn't change, though.
>> 
>> As currently proposed, no. But if I enabled the separate history
>> unconditionally then it would.
>
> No, it won't.  M-p and M-n would still work as they did before.

The history list they would cycle through would be the eww history
list, not the global minibuffer history list.  What am I missing?

Robert

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.