GNU bug report logs - #29597
26.0.90; line-number-display-width returns incorrect width

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Paul Rankin <hello <at> paulwrankin.com>

Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 05:36:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: notabug

Found in version 26.0.90

Done: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #51 received at 29597 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Paul Rankin <hello <at> paulwrankin.com>, 29597 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#29597: 26.0.90;
 line-number-display-width returns incorrect width
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 17:39:09 -0500
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>> From: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net>
>> Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 11:23:18 -0500
>> Cc: Paul Rankin <hello <at> paulwrankin.com>, 29597 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>>
>> > I don't object to such trivial wrappers, although I'd raise a brow if
>> > I saw something like this in Emacs.  It sounds too trivial to have 2
>> > more symbols in the name-space.  But that's me.
>>
>> Is the symbol space really a scarce resource?
>
> Not really scarce, but do you really feel good with such trivial
> wrappers?  Do we have anything similar anywhere else?

Flag parameters are pretty common in Emacs, but it doesn't make me
feel better about them.
I feel pretty okay about wrappers. For other examples, string-match-p
is a fairly trivial wrapper around string-match.




This bug report was last modified 7 years and 161 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.