From unknown Wed Aug 20 04:12:10 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#29518 <29518@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#29518 <29518@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 27.0.50; Compilation errors grab frame focus Reply-To: bug#29518 <29518@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 11:12:10 +0000 retitle 29518 27.0.50; Compilation errors grab frame focus reassign 29518 emacs submitter 29518 Eric Abrahamsen severity 29518 normal tag 29518 unreproducible moreinfo thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 01 10:51:39 2017 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Dec 2017 15:51:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40170 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eKnbH-0001nB-AQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 10:51:39 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35114) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eKnbG-0001my-4u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 10:51:38 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eKna9-0004Pt-Ks for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 10:51:32 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:56589) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eKna9-0004P7-86 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 10:50:29 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51346) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eKnZK-000378-Gx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 10:50:28 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eKnYd-0002si-GT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 10:49:38 -0500 Received: from mail.ericabrahamsen.net ([50.56.99.223]:45594) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eKnYd-0002bo-9W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 10:48:55 -0500 Received: from localhost (c-73-19-4-181.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [73.19.4.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: eric@ericabrahamsen.net) by mail.ericabrahamsen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8565AC049A for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2017 00:31:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mail.ericabrahamsen.net; s=mail; t=1512088314; bh=5aUVnsNdKMt/CaMjQ9mBiJPFzDJqnM9HdV5qJojs5Ko=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=N/04kKmcpH1nz5BMJqf0TYI9buSYrABhDxgj8xUJiAcAkdv4naciF61MbDnK/rwM6 kB6nksWK4oTfwB7Ec8qmSOFKFtf3EboW4ZiCY9g6LxwxXgrf0+SVHlMKfkqs3Loy5A DSQBJukvhxeezjHoroSNBWvdhGVVAfZiQ96r4UxY= From: Eric Abrahamsen To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 27.0.50; Compilation errors grab frame focus Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 16:29:56 -0800 Message-ID: <87609rs323.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) I've noticed over the past few weeks (couple of months?) that, while updating packages, any compilation errors result in the *Package List* frame grabbing focus. I start a package upgrade, switch to some other program, and then (some packages produce a lot of errors!) start a focus tug-of-war with the Emacs frame where the compilation is going on. I am on arch linux, with no DE, running i3 directly on X. I note that if I move to a different workspace, compilation errors cause the workspace where the frame lives to turn red (which seems to be the i3 behavior for frames with warnings or notifications or whatever the X terminology is), but I'm not yanked back there. If I'm in that workspace, however, the Emacs frame keeps jumping to the fore. I've looked through the Emacs git log to see if anything jumps out as having been changed, but most of the frame/focus stuff seems NS-related. But I'm pretty sure this is new behavior. In GNU Emacs 27.0.50 (build 13, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.22.26) of 2017-11-30 built on slip Repository revision: 3f3d98ee5851840228786390ee7dbf851d144eb8 Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11905000 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 06 09:50:43 2018 Received: (at 29518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jan 2018 14:50:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37668 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eXpo2-0002jn-Uw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2018 09:50:43 -0500 Received: from mail-io0-f174.google.com ([209.85.223.174]:36135) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eXpo1-0002jV-7w; Sat, 06 Jan 2018 09:50:41 -0500 Received: by mail-io0-f174.google.com with SMTP id i143so8674217ioa.3; Sat, 06 Jan 2018 06:50:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=H6xeQQScITC6+rFjTkUcJ9Ni391dpn1y+dlTBa0IMOM=; b=IIpYGyPro6YpoL9jOSeLVbk57UNcoddIki8jTB4SW6LYFl2DbfuTj9WdMSqnN+46y+ QpGz+kcE+vyeYTDN+yrQcO1JoPyd/rkbpNrF4C4v0AkTPn2qFwfCFS+mSBv1gCZHd2N7 Br+AyHm6D27RNsiCLa0/O5rYMgnEQS/iyHPP5BqHc/v39aY+0l34Vx3VXCi/6t79kXCp mZzGZ67lgtIhyrTnHGwEmcIuFqlMXxrmvCBoaSJh50MJd7jPifzi328OfY3BpuuTq91U Y+NA/MKa7wqqvvNE8HyKSlJj7+/1OCm0APAji0V4XlPisOAPihZPA6YktglGWaAvVdu1 2QXQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=H6xeQQScITC6+rFjTkUcJ9Ni391dpn1y+dlTBa0IMOM=; b=iVGbJF5g6ADxeaQ7GqTHEl+ZFXbWFG0z1FUmk0DwrPey6LP6f68OnUkB0VeEZtF8IV v4yFiZMXbTO2+gJFVLZQ7iemWErHmfoj4u0UxtBYvN0CL4dD+jziRfeHn3tX4LzTMtY7 e4YkD5/yCwQ3PivjJakxmXZzo+5LhLoRrtwzUqfv8Y2Iwn67Ka8z3qpN+ikamJ4iq6NF s+l+ytbxLa+XtAZjIlO4j5yYJ0EOPxZXNu6XfXTshkJwA2ivmwqBqsjgyyLx2p+qoERw L0np6vgZ/5jUz2p0+oV3xMEmu9fmB9lPDCiltaff/M/KnP3IYCa0r0U74N435Ot2J42o pwDA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mKHX0amAVlgG3k3LtDDAN89HzWaDs8EoQUx+cbWm44UxI+4hWtL /a0mmvs71Bs5fVBEU+zzAKV4kA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBot9zNRfMfVDGiifeykbPZyPO+QXuaOSXkDvBnZycy8AUFvDIhaBJgSmdunHIFdCbzP2iWhnbw== X-Received: by 10.107.62.194 with SMTP id l185mr6466500ioa.200.1515250235101; Sat, 06 Jan 2018 06:50:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from zebian ([45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id w69sm4731799itb.35.2018.01.06.06.50.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 06 Jan 2018 06:50:33 -0800 (PST) From: Noam Postavsky To: Eric Abrahamsen Subject: Re: bug#29518: 27.0.50; Compilation errors grab frame focus References: <87609rs323.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2018 09:50:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87609rs323.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Thu, 30 Nov 2017 16:29:56 -0800") Message-ID: <87po6nqbwo.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29518 Cc: 29518@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain tags 29518 + unreproducible quit Eric Abrahamsen writes: > I've noticed over the past few weeks (couple of months?) that, while > updating packages, any compilation errors result in the *Package List* > frame grabbing focus. > > I start a package upgrade, switch to some other program, and then (some > packages produce a lot of errors!) start a focus tug-of-war with the > Emacs frame where the compilation is going on. > > I am on arch linux, with no DE, running i3 directly on X. I note that if > I move to a different workspace, compilation errors cause the workspace > where the frame lives to turn red (which seems to be the i3 behavior for > frames with warnings or notifications or whatever the X terminology is), > but I'm not yanked back there. If I'm in that workspace, however, the > Emacs frame keeps jumping to the fore. > > I've looked through the Emacs git log to see if anything jumps out as > having been changed, but most of the frame/focus stuff seems NS-related. > But I'm pretty sure this is new behavior. > > > In GNU Emacs 27.0.50 (build 13, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.22.26) > of 2017-11-30 built on slip > Repository revision: 3f3d98ee5851840228786390ee7dbf851d144eb8 > Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11905000 I can't reproduce this. I'm also running i3 directly on X (Debian stable though). I tried M-x package-install-file RET some-errors.el RET (see the attached file) then switch focus to a nearby terminal window. The compile error did not trigger a change in focus. --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=some-errors.el Content-Description: elisp triggering compile error ;;; some-errors.el --- while ocmpiling ;; Copyright (C) 2008-2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc. ;; Version: 0.1 ;; Package-Requires: ((cl-lib "0.5")) (eval-when-compile (sleep-for 1)) (eval-when-compile (error "foo")) ;;; some-errors.el ends here --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain There have been some changes to the way timeouts are handles, which could affect frame/focusing stuff (see #24091, #25521, and #29095), but I don't think it should cause what you are seeing. --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 06 15:13:49 2018 Received: (at 29518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jan 2018 20:13:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38463 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eXuqj-0005z1-4e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2018 15:13:49 -0500 Received: from mail.ericabrahamsen.net ([50.56.99.223]:44616) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eXuqh-0005yt-2o for 29518@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2018 15:13:47 -0500 Received: from localhost (71-212-75-109.tukw.qwest.net [71.212.75.109]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: eric@ericabrahamsen.net) by mail.ericabrahamsen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 43547BFE1C; Sat, 6 Jan 2018 20:13:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mail.ericabrahamsen.net; s=mail; t=1515269626; bh=QCdUGTUgvB+E7EhKYoh9VpqH6sdsc2F1hnxJRryfvTg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=wg47RDEUCsqf4WU7vKmDyfanEA1Mau6AkRWAicEemnR76iXR+QMPyIMtD4/qUR57k pmhBXnlgBhDD19e7c+74UbEuRczjvvFdubd9I53R0hwbWxD/WGRvsqvAGX9dpu0ne2 Vq8+4k03ILfL/6NdTJFNBZ7pmRHwQ1BbiDzF1jW8= From: Eric Abrahamsen To: Noam Postavsky Subject: Re: bug#29518: 27.0.50; Compilation errors grab frame focus References: <87609rs323.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87po6nqbwo.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2018 12:13:44 -0800 In-Reply-To: <87po6nqbwo.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> (Noam Postavsky's message of "Sat, 06 Jan 2018 09:50:31 -0500") Message-ID: <877esun3t3.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29518 Cc: 29518@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) On 01/06/18 09:50 AM, Noam Postavsky wrote: > tags 29518 + unreproducible > quit > > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> I've noticed over the past few weeks (couple of months?) that, while >> updating packages, any compilation errors result in the *Package List* >> frame grabbing focus. >> >> I start a package upgrade, switch to some other program, and then (some >> packages produce a lot of errors!) start a focus tug-of-war with the >> Emacs frame where the compilation is going on. >> >> I am on arch linux, with no DE, running i3 directly on X. I note that if >> I move to a different workspace, compilation errors cause the workspace >> where the frame lives to turn red (which seems to be the i3 behavior for >> frames with warnings or notifications or whatever the X terminology is), >> but I'm not yanked back there. If I'm in that workspace, however, the >> Emacs frame keeps jumping to the fore. >> >> I've looked through the Emacs git log to see if anything jumps out as >> having been changed, but most of the frame/focus stuff seems NS-related. >> But I'm pretty sure this is new behavior. >> >> >> In GNU Emacs 27.0.50 (build 13, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.22.26) >> of 2017-11-30 built on slip >> Repository revision: 3f3d98ee5851840228786390ee7dbf851d144eb8 >> Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11905000 > > I can't reproduce this. I'm also running i3 directly on X (Debian > stable though). I tried M-x package-install-file RET some-errors.el RET > (see the attached file) then switch focus to a nearby terminal window. > The compile error did not trigger a change in focus. Thanks for the test! That triggers the same focus-grabbing behavior for me -- from other Emacs frames, and other applications' frames, using "emacs -Q". You tried this also with switching to a different workspace? And it didn't turn the workspace's tab red? Perhaps something's configured differently on my system (though I don't know why it would be, I didn't customize anything). Is there anything I might be looking for in config.log? > There have been some changes to the way timeouts are handles, which > could affect frame/focusing stuff (see #24091, #25521, and #29095), but > I don't think it should cause what you are seeing. I fooled with `x-wait-for-event-timeout' but that didn't do anything. I suppose 6a788d2fc18c23dcfc5d0352649b2f690e9cbff7 could be related (FRAME_VISIBLE_P certainly sounds relevant) but I don't actually understand what's happening in there. Should I try just reverting the commit and re-building? Thanks, Eric From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 06 15:31:44 2018 Received: (at 29518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jan 2018 20:31:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38469 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eXv83-0006Or-Oc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2018 15:31:43 -0500 Received: from mail-it0-f47.google.com ([209.85.214.47]:43841) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eXv81-0006Od-3P for 29518@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2018 15:31:41 -0500 Received: by mail-it0-f47.google.com with SMTP id u62so5175854ita.2 for <29518@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 06 Jan 2018 12:31:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=7M+EWa+977rvLxyu5RSNQRtzb4cgnqno/8UIK7gsqeI=; b=ZcmlqviXvxpv41cdt8y5Lb+NW8rjBwk7rqH8zCQqjiqhDSi7e8olIac0qDzJOP4GF3 rx/TDyah09qdXQiEwBW2iAcuLAxKv9VpIA5OqITGMLI7FgwO21zRD2PQcQ9jTPSk3Z/v bHjyraLJ+qR1Ae5z4slp/9bPv85ZOn6+YQoXHgszVom9tsf97YFgMwMjvJ6862QyywoA qwTgv9ONsGkFi6SHttuFpL8QRfXk+17aF1S7iN1Kd2zAdrPDVlZc/450WPHR/fO9t+BY SzAkKQzDkl7rneizp0atvCqfiW8zE6DyUO2wZoA5SE0pf2YLKIM9oKx9mrL5Az9QDLY+ aagA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=7M+EWa+977rvLxyu5RSNQRtzb4cgnqno/8UIK7gsqeI=; b=olqpD2vDnHZpCUV69L1Z4kN+SvNai7V9zyCxMq6176QidXEDOWhpMfEnn4NdWyIIVI SVbZw8hhBNQtrOyFlJT1OKSzT88lU0B158Ad1wsGwrG5K/rWxuaxV5rd6+ilTL97+1bO A1rpK7GFxKCuSpSPWJseGVmY3Dl60xuqGXIVnWRgcF+aFePz6xZxA8IXer08TsNEgKPj dcdwO31k1BJ8RCOSUAnA8/frvJd/28NlQGiIFJM3MhN22iTRjYuSxmfMorBIWbwwo0kH F5QnmH2C2Yn7k/JaosbDF16SgxgRjUb3uMDm561JHpmnKXMooN+Yq0J/LR6P1SMoCglU pOng== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mJxai0Ds1x57jmx+dvUsUWWwkHFqUT/SAwe7pCFBK36FU/lQkJv t7tfm6W/r0+ZG/0rmL2hr2hMXw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBou6HoTL8ZXekE37p3/zF06xr/vRD+GSLZkMefWDJCj8YrRnmXH4umYTRo8mIkz16p4GwVcXag== X-Received: by 10.36.114.149 with SMTP id x143mr7524359itc.82.1515270695208; Sat, 06 Jan 2018 12:31:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from zebian ([45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 139sm3459418itm.2.2018.01.06.12.31.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 06 Jan 2018 12:31:34 -0800 (PST) From: Noam Postavsky To: Eric Abrahamsen Subject: Re: bug#29518: 27.0.50; Compilation errors grab frame focus References: <87609rs323.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87po6nqbwo.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <877esun3t3.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2018 15:31:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: <877esun3t3.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Sat, 06 Jan 2018 12:13:44 -0800") Message-ID: <87mv1qraoq.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29518 Cc: 29518@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) Eric Abrahamsen writes: > Thanks for the test! That triggers the same focus-grabbing behavior for > me -- from other Emacs frames, and other applications' frames, using > "emacs -Q". > > You tried this also with switching to a different workspace? And it > didn't turn the workspace's tab red? I tried now switching to a different workspace after starting the compile, the tab did not turn red. > Perhaps something's configured differently on my system (though I don't > know why it would be, I didn't customize anything). Is there anything I > might be looking for in config.log? I can't think of anything. If you M-x debug-on-error RET x-focus-frame RET do you get any hits? >> There have been some changes to the way timeouts are handles, which >> could affect frame/focusing stuff (see #24091, #25521, and #29095), but >> I don't think it should cause what you are seeing. > > I fooled with `x-wait-for-event-timeout' but that didn't do anything. I > suppose 6a788d2fc18c23dcfc5d0352649b2f690e9cbff7 could be related > (FRAME_VISIBLE_P certainly sounds relevant) but I don't actually > understand what's happening in there. Should I try just reverting the > commit and re-building? I don't expect it to affect this, but since we have no other leads, I suppose you may as well try it. You would probably need to revert [1: e1f6e3127a] first. [1: e1f6e3127a]: 2017-09-29 18:40:06 -0400 Bring back the busy wait after x_make_frame_visible (Bug#25521) https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=e1f6e3127a292e6ba66d27c49ddda4fe949569f5 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 14 23:40:23 2018 Received: (at 29518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jan 2018 04:40:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56573 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eawZL-00071r-Db for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 23:40:23 -0500 Received: from mail.ericabrahamsen.net ([50.56.99.223]:48710) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eawZJ-00071j-KS for 29518@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 23:40:21 -0500 Received: from localhost (71-212-75-109.tukw.qwest.net [71.212.75.109]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: eric@ericabrahamsen.net) by mail.ericabrahamsen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 751AFC0113; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 04:40:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mail.ericabrahamsen.net; s=mail; t=1515991220; bh=Aop2bgWJh3b36UtLP6pZPajEXwscASZVLzN0+6Y74hI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=s0slkq7Mxp50KXnwxbx0adykvNWB1M+LzPBJ3mskaFvCBeT2prXbO1GtRfejNqg0C ZDyZbhWj4xCxPIKJFCeguJCzyxxbsWrv+NzENViWrkMS8Uj1z73W/39wONI94JpYxe /aJys7pyhPPbwG7CtsRRxu+bznW3rM0hJTrlpDhw= From: Eric Abrahamsen To: Noam Postavsky Subject: Re: bug#29518: 27.0.50; Compilation errors grab frame focus References: <87609rs323.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87po6nqbwo.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <877esun3t3.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87mv1qraoq.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 20:40:19 -0800 In-Reply-To: <87mv1qraoq.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> (Noam Postavsky's message of "Sat, 06 Jan 2018 15:31:33 -0500") Message-ID: <87h8rnpwek.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29518 Cc: 29518@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) On 01/06/18 15:31 PM, Noam Postavsky wrote: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> Thanks for the test! That triggers the same focus-grabbing behavior for >> me -- from other Emacs frames, and other applications' frames, using >> "emacs -Q". >> >> You tried this also with switching to a different workspace? And it >> didn't turn the workspace's tab red? > > I tried now switching to a different workspace after starting the > compile, the tab did not turn red. > >> Perhaps something's configured differently on my system (though I don't >> know why it would be, I didn't customize anything). Is there anything I >> might be looking for in config.log? > > I can't think of anything. If you M-x debug-on-error RET x-focus-frame > RET do you get any hits? Sorry about the slow response... That was an odd recipe, but turning on debug-on-error, then running several varieties of (x-focus-frame (window-frame)), including focusing the current frame or other frames, never did anything other than what I would expect it to -- returning nil when the frame was already focused, and focusing the frame when it wasn't. >>> There have been some changes to the way timeouts are handles, which >>> could affect frame/focusing stuff (see #24091, #25521, and #29095), but >>> I don't think it should cause what you are seeing. >> >> I fooled with `x-wait-for-event-timeout' but that didn't do anything. I >> suppose 6a788d2fc18c23dcfc5d0352649b2f690e9cbff7 could be related >> (FRAME_VISIBLE_P certainly sounds relevant) but I don't actually >> understand what's happening in there. Should I try just reverting the >> commit and re-building? > > I don't expect it to affect this, but since we have no other leads, I > suppose you may as well try it. You would probably need to revert [1: > e1f6e3127a] first. > > [1: e1f6e3127a]: 2017-09-29 18:40:06 -0400 > Bring back the busy wait after x_make_frame_visible (Bug#25521) > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=e1f6e3127a292e6ba66d27c49ddda4fe949569f5 I wasn't able to revert those commits cleanly, and I guess I don't really think that's the issue. I suspect this is a change in X behavior (Arch has xorg-server 1.19), and maybe it's not worth chasing after at this point. Maybe it's enough just to leave this report hanging here, and see if anyone else runs into it? Eric From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 15 07:07:18 2018 Received: (at 29518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jan 2018 12:07:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56725 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eb3Xq-0000xy-OI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 07:07:18 -0500 Received: from mail-it0-f53.google.com ([209.85.214.53]:40087) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eb3Xp-0000xl-Jp for 29518@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 07:07:17 -0500 Received: by mail-it0-f53.google.com with SMTP id 196so616825iti.5 for <29518@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 04:07:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=DfTkcE5xfhymR8XEdDTpjCj0hoFEZWKX87Wm3WkbEu4=; b=N0x/Y7ec4Am5diEVB8YoF9vmDCCmWILbhdQ0E1KLfrXIky5Yk2ddWmE1G0lqDD8Srf 130fN0U8e0wiaMXVTuEkZqUMwsEN5elavVJdXUxERQ5BN2o72NiB1PvosJ5FXrb4t5Tu KW+UbNUQdPkTNG1ijuKG4YFSbCSdFUf6ESWeQ1WJY5HXzu2mB/8qeEizvkzGLO9lSY9o WAjc4BkAOClbfJkQwyYi4sy3RCgJXZGJpxI0nrtlMGgXcgvCIkvnU2l2/ttEvMkkEdD/ 95rNOvuXzFaGZhQJrsTXfJ7+ckykD4gQ6PKVx3gtGvg2x0T1fGrSVJf5ILKk4dflepYk b/NQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=DfTkcE5xfhymR8XEdDTpjCj0hoFEZWKX87Wm3WkbEu4=; b=pDTkzpTyyqj9mmFwgG5eSc/N/zitR7hOq2y4QuaKl4ZJmbbSY4h//ZLTbly+jW5SUb Rcn8n3FIDfBjhHpjhdWYQ/pnuaeM9HQKs+ND9tJaY60MtA7wrjJaRBmpLi0fLyPFeksM 2LWGLty7e4ocqtO7/MufA0u/VuButD21JTfIAJfD/Otkw5X0Nf6mJ9eVBNW0PDxvtgp+ VaRsqOCHIBEbCigkjDj4ee/JrX2AjvxJeHxfXpZLlGrghHchCjuDP90WIvRDdScf3Ag9 Mzlvg5Yf1PVFEPKrm/kpb1H5Z7xXVhyMjH05mbXeExByUdTxDNi/U0xQw8dpeAUkB2Nf 0IBg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytfomJFMF1IDpSLVQPbnNX7PSY1ndR6fIDD+YWfzUnXN/Q608udn T3kaYTDwvLxT+7cbZ0k4Q2CGcw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotMEJ8p8fjzHAK4MmGyNHsuk9+7LdwCs1pLdzMvNzM0ToVqk7zw4LHUBjfug3yeAZI6WRUEdA== X-Received: by 10.36.51.201 with SMTP id k192mr6632510itk.71.1516018031876; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 04:07:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from zebian ([45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id l15sm15326990iog.56.2018.01.15.04.07.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 15 Jan 2018 04:07:10 -0800 (PST) From: Noam Postavsky To: Eric Abrahamsen Subject: Re: bug#29518: 27.0.50; Compilation errors grab frame focus References: <87609rs323.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87po6nqbwo.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <877esun3t3.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87mv1qraoq.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87h8rnpwek.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 07:07:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87h8rnpwek.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Sun, 14 Jan 2018 20:40:19 -0800") Message-ID: <878tczpbpu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29518 Cc: 29518@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) Eric Abrahamsen writes: > On 01/06/18 15:31 PM, Noam Postavsky wrote: >> I can't think of anything. If you M-x debug-on-error RET x-focus-frame >> RET do you get any hits? > > Sorry about the slow response... > > That was an odd recipe, but turning on debug-on-error, then running > several varieties of (x-focus-frame (window-frame)), including focusing > the current frame or other frames, never did anything other than what I > would expect it to -- returning nil when the frame was already focused, > and focusing the frame when it wasn't. Oh, it's odd because I made a thinko, that should have been M-x debug-on-entry ... ^^^^^ > I wasn't able to revert those commits cleanly, and I guess I don't > really think that's the issue. I suspect this is a change in X behavior > (Arch has xorg-server 1.19), and maybe it's not worth chasing after at > this point. Maybe it's enough just to leave this report hanging here, > and see if anyone else runs into it? Hmm, I guess. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 15 19:15:23 2018 Received: (at 29518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jan 2018 00:15:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57888 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ebEuR-00009D-0M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 19:15:23 -0500 Received: from mail.ericabrahamsen.net ([50.56.99.223]:40191) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ebEuO-000094-LQ for 29518@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 19:15:20 -0500 Received: from localhost (71-212-75-109.tukw.qwest.net [71.212.75.109]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: eric@ericabrahamsen.net) by mail.ericabrahamsen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF83AC0152; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 00:15:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mail.ericabrahamsen.net; s=mail; t=1516061720; bh=kXcxS5r3bmVFCpEcYaTUD9q17xXIeWAFRRVxpCj+qPA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=krc1ERMSeFbJZ9lcfhNVQSbbsE2GwHJZYluh7MyMqhKoZcawIHXfKgDbnheWyCacc qsJjYvPFy+Fxb9Glj1EnY9rOnBaYE8HBhMpGm+AAmDCjbBguQoeQNOmOJ5aIrSuigh RM9SA1o0Iu3EFTr6uhjVGaUe8OlkmWUH+Johnm3M= From: Eric Abrahamsen To: Noam Postavsky Subject: Re: bug#29518: 27.0.50; Compilation errors grab frame focus References: <87609rs323.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87po6nqbwo.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <877esun3t3.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87mv1qraoq.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87h8rnpwek.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <878tczpbpu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 16:15:19 -0800 In-Reply-To: <878tczpbpu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> (Noam Postavsky's message of "Mon, 15 Jan 2018 07:07:09 -0500") Message-ID: <87d12amzfs.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29518 Cc: 29518@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) On 01/15/18 07:07 AM, Noam Postavsky wrote: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> On 01/06/18 15:31 PM, Noam Postavsky wrote: >>> I can't think of anything. If you M-x debug-on-error RET x-focus-frame >>> RET do you get any hits? >> >> Sorry about the slow response... >> >> That was an odd recipe, but turning on debug-on-error, then running >> several varieties of (x-focus-frame (window-frame)), including focusing >> the current frame or other frames, never did anything other than what I >> would expect it to -- returning nil when the frame was already focused, >> and focusing the frame when it wasn't. > > Oh, it's odd because I made a thinko, that should have been M-x > debug-on-entry ... > ^^^^^ Aha! Turning that on results in nothing happening -- re-running your earlier recipe for compile/install errors still yanks focus, but does not enter the debugger. Other frame-switching activity (eg `helm-projectile-switch-to-buffer') does enter the debugger. Weird. Eric From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 23 10:51:18 2022 Received: (at 29518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jan 2022 15:51:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40856 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nBf9C-0004RS-OA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 10:51:18 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:39480) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nBf9A-0004R9-VE for 29518@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 10:51:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=eaR0d5madXk8DIGDv5vgHH/lk/ajkmf7pIYug40GXeE=; b=H89wVOJql+sSWMTyfQfiP/whVH Ag/jYAAG1zN48XIZOfjvRxOY2ySEo06cmimkikWadI15FPxhreK6KL1W47gVH8zHhlBzrxhdLZWKC a0nt6K6LeuABYuEAAy91VwvInA7v8Phh/JWZOLe+V9irGVcGZP0DUaMh3mF2li1y2kr0=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=giant) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nBf92-0006H6-4Y; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 16:51:11 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eric Abrahamsen Subject: Re: bug#29518: 27.0.50; Compilation errors grab frame focus References: <87609rs323.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87po6nqbwo.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <877esun3t3.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87mv1qraoq.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87h8rnpwek.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <878tczpbpu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87d12amzfs.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> X-Now-Playing: Jane Siberry's _The Speckless Sky_: "The Taxi Ride" Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 16:51:07 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87d12amzfs.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Mon, 15 Jan 2018 16:15:19 -0800") Message-ID: <87sfte8n84.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eric Abrahamsen writes: > Aha! Turning that on results in nothing happening -- re-running your > earlier recipe for compile/install errors still yanks focus, but does > not enter the debugger. Other frame-switching activity [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29518 Cc: 29518@debbugs.gnu.org, Noam Postavsky X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Eric Abrahamsen writes: > Aha! Turning that on results in nothing happening -- re-running your > earlier recipe for compile/install errors still yanks focus, but does > not enter the debugger. Other frame-switching activity (eg > `helm-projectile-switch-to-buffer') does enter the debugger. (I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately weren't resolved at the time.) Are you still seeing this behaviour in recent Emacs versions? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 23 10:51:25 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jan 2022 15:51:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40859 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nBf9I-0004Rn-Uq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 10:51:25 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:39496) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nBf9H-0004RP-Fg for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 10:51:23 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=mrNCDFlkfquc+vFL+HlSyKpkySfNeVwPjdTvzA9/y/c=; b=VwTHBDZ9GJjaILenEmDh/QgZvG 40RNMLB2NQUt+BLp/UBHiWd9B9saulrjVMps6ZsXjlLPP2MOyNZs9pKwz0oALsxCMsDPOZdqdmY7U vbSOxgWiH3pHFslvqW1uaJucByP/gOZiKF+gNaejlpDiJ/zlfQPx8cL6bR3KdMLV3TGc=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=giant) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nBf99-0006HD-NG for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 16:51:17 +0100 Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 16:51:13 +0100 Message-Id: <87r18y8n7y.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #29518 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 29518 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 29518 + moreinfo quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 23 20:04:41 2022 Received: (at 29518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jan 2022 01:04:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41560 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nBnmj-000258-F8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 20:04:41 -0500 Received: from mail.ericabrahamsen.net ([52.70.2.18]:50832) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nBnmg-00024t-90 for 29518@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 20:04:39 -0500 Received: from localhost (c-71-197-232-41.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [71.197.232.41]) (Authenticated sender: eric@ericabrahamsen.net) by mail.ericabrahamsen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4547BFA01F; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 01:04:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericabrahamsen.net; s=mail; t=1642986270; bh=mznLbjV/QsS1wD6bJ6lO5wYdxb0TYtg9sHmyN7nsm34=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=yeqj6+zPiTiBGykF6Y1mun4Qe0+lY/cUegmRHjqOQ/VnOpNLky3HKcw/Y5TY01PC+ DdXuDOk3Ityuv1bdW766eoQAGraVWFtc+w/z6jsVIDX0JzV8+f0HPWluVvTXhmrAfm S0t8RsjQDyilqJ0taGavn4+ybM5gxFnjj3kHtdOE= From: Eric Abrahamsen To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#29518: 27.0.50; Compilation errors grab frame focus References: <87609rs323.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87po6nqbwo.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <877esun3t3.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87mv1qraoq.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87h8rnpwek.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <878tczpbpu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87d12amzfs.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87sfte8n84.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 17:04:28 -0800 In-Reply-To: <87sfte8n84.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 23 Jan 2022 16:51:07 +0100") Message-ID: <87y23654gz.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29518 Cc: 29518@debbugs.gnu.org, Noam Postavsky X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) On 01/23/22 16:51 PM, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> Aha! Turning that on results in nothing happening -- re-running your >> earlier recipe for compile/install errors still yanks focus, but does >> not enter the debugger. Other frame-switching activity (eg >> `helm-projectile-switch-to-buffer') does enter the debugger. > > (I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately weren't resolved > at the time.) > > Are you still seeing this behaviour in recent Emacs versions? I'm not! Feel free to close. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 24 04:42:50 2022 Received: (at 29518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jan 2022 09:42:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42113 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nBvs9-0008Lm-U8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 04:42:50 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:48512) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nBvs8-0008LM-1i for 29518@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 04:42:48 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=S13lew19xpwYQQiWpeP3jy9wx37IvL3zTwLqkUPkKac=; b=c4jGM18jVClgeqVB3TaNfu2bfa HHLvbs0O5uue2QS2vIwgTq55Wa5TjGDNjbd4ycWG0h5Fo7zmuSQbE6FKSkPTwOQ9RY6zU+hHiKXaa DbGMnR/2G7i055JogIEU8PfXap2WIkVyNYlB5+FTrLf/FE9mKBZYLLrzctAEj21QDWjU=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=giant) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nBvrz-0006RE-Hy; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 10:42:42 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eric Abrahamsen Subject: Re: bug#29518: 27.0.50; Compilation errors grab frame focus References: <87609rs323.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87po6nqbwo.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <877esun3t3.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87mv1qraoq.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87h8rnpwek.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <878tczpbpu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87d12amzfs.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87sfte8n84.fsf@gnus.org> <87y23654gz.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAALVBMVEUDBQwfGCEtLTFs bHCrrLDR0dXw8PJ9fYFgWmGPkJS9vcFFOEN+f4NNTVH///8PU95gAAAAAWJLR0QOb70wTwAAAAd0 SU1FB+YBGAkIHpkDiBsAAAGcSURBVDjLrZJNS8NAEIZn41GEJD1JKdR4qUgOtRWtKFj6oRFvNZV6 bgb0rHfRXEQEKanQYg8iLejR/gm9qfUQkf4Xt5umH7vrzXchsPtk5t2dGYCRNNDTZRzosIgIk1Lc AFSKjj0FIOExUlq1n6cB6N06BY/uQR54kTvEnUtrUwAwX8ZcKtUXgVLE3P2LKgL9DHOND96A/hjd wFL+nQd0RV08zp9zYE4FNZbGqscD0EyIFPAkLQBwkzP0hRneA0ii5UqBppv05ZgSUhGtW6DgVfRQ WEtqosfiIACzfEV0I+hhlj83/TpKADH8NZYJH7i7Gv5bh4Ft3qF3GkzDrQA8lAHN6DWlAHT/D0BM NnFOmTOnId9tu4xHQgNpRfbatm21wr15HU5FzCtgpXExuo42KJrGQAedfGs6zbjq1fgwgBWZfZRB Y9FphZnooJEgjAHcV4cgDADyxcAu25GJdgXAqY1dQy1Rc9tKjvZqGBcp2E83C+oEGCqaaayAVHrf iMtJLLP+KTtXek1ry5CAWf/K+tElgCwbfbkJgf/WL9tlhd4YWsDQAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOmNyZWF0 ZQAyMDIyLTAxLTI0VDA5OjA4OjMwKzAwOjAw7+6+lQAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTptb2RpZnkAMjAyMi0w MS0yNFQwOTowODozMCswMDowMJ6zBikAAAAASUVORK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: This Mortal Coil's _Filigree & Shadow_: "Red Rain" Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 10:42:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87y23654gz.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Sun, 23 Jan 2022 17:04:28 -0800") Message-ID: <87o8414ghc.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eric Abrahamsen writes: >> Are you still seeing this behaviour in recent Emacs versions? > > I'm not! Feel free to close. OK; done. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29518 Cc: 29518@debbugs.gnu.org, Noam Postavsky X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Eric Abrahamsen writes: >> Are you still seeing this behaviour in recent Emacs versions? > > I'm not! Feel free to close. OK; done. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 24 04:42:58 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jan 2022 09:42:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42116 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nBvsI-0008MB-4K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 04:42:58 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:48528) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nBvsG-0008Lv-DQ for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 04:42:56 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=rGmGSnH982vdpcmJxARmn5VTddsKSyQhVLHnYUFH6XY=; b=eruvxWPZaUhLZPbWgAMjEQVr4w mR7ATb9c4NdCq673kkDlPNvd3UoXEFilqjrJOBddcpCdFMVohUYC0Dez3rTGEik1+uTB5PyUOjmM9 67YcktIQyoAM3KVgKDAf2PeyjplG8C4817U83d5zp1BEbiFdGaykeJ0gWOWSOpB+gAho=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=giant) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nBvs8-0006RK-Hu for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 10:42:50 +0100 Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 10:42:48 +0100 Message-Id: <87mtjl4gh3.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #29518 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 29518 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 29518 quit From unknown Wed Aug 20 04:12:10 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 12:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator