From unknown Fri Aug 15 14:48:40 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#29516 <29516@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#29516 <29516@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Maxima fails to build Reply-To: bug#29516 <29516@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 21:48:40 +0000 retitle 29516 Maxima fails to build reassign 29516 guix submitter 29516 Diego Nicola Barbato severity 29516 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 01 10:44:52 2017 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Dec 2017 15:44:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40151 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eKnUi-0001b9-HE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 10:44:52 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51893) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eKnUg-0001ax-T7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 10:44:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eKnTn-0003iO-C2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 10:44:45 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:54838) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eKnTm-0003gq-CP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 10:43:54 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39945) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eKnT8-0005b5-Hw for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 10:43:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eKnSH-0001Xk-J2 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 10:43:14 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:34413) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eKnSG-0001SY-HY for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 10:42:21 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 346E520F42 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2017 11:53:03 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1512125583; bh=H+4h+rYKGvFPj5mJDAMu07lyLtzY1qjL5cSAtX5KyGM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=q6N2SdG0MvtQ+5AcDwYi6Z2kABuiJmjB/kAkkUoL7D/7SH0ExTFTJ/N5reYBIS/ZX uQ5oWu9j98Te52/tVCyD2PWzUhezoAlNveyJ+n1+FKbYwh010PqMkEkwMmm/5nR3Ds CMHO8uIFgerkxkQ+1utKh24nsXtpHyhD1Lzp8BVCk//3iol4ttyM916e9LVdFTGTW6 5rU/SGhEMXsDPSkFQHSf4jakG7BEs3C/7YgUn2t6OJjUSLogU0NlVtzRE/rAbWvPyu Kzd6JlNt6o59GPha5Rc+ma839xNz1/LASBE7CHEQqnZi6FHDuO7wwLX8HaUETSnujW B+z107DYqZ11Q== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3ypB2645zHz9rxX for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2017 11:53:02 +0100 (CET) From: Diego Nicola Barbato To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Maxima fails to build Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2017 11:53:01 +0100 Message-ID: <87po7y1zzm.fsf@GlaDOS.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hello Guix, `guix build maxima' fails during the `check' phase with the following output: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline; filename=maxima-build-error.txt Content-Description: error message starting phase `check' Making check in admin make[1]: Entering directory '/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/admin' make[1]: Nothing to be done for 'check'. make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/admin' Making check in crosscompile-windows make[1]: Entering directory '/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/crosscompile-windows' make[1]: Nothing to be done for 'check'. make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/crosscompile-windows' Making check in src make[1]: Entering directory '/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/src' make[1]: Nothing to be done for 'check'. make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/src' Making check in lisp-utils make[1]: Entering directory '/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/lisp-utils' make[1]: Nothing to be done for 'check'. make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/lisp-utils' Making check in tests make[1]: Entering directory '/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/tests' make check-TESTS make[2]: Entering directory '/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/tests' make[3]: Entering directory '/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/tests' sed <"test.sh.in" >"gcl-test.sh" \ -e 's#!LOCAL_MAXIMA!#/gnu/store/kpxi8h3669afr9r1bgvaf9ij3y4wdyyn-bash-minimal-4.4.12/bin/sh ../maxima-local#' \ -e 's#!LISPNAME!#gcl#' \ -e 's#!OUTPUT_LOG!#../tests/gcl.log#' chmod a+x "gcl-test.sh" FAIL: gcl-test.sh make[4]: Entering directory '/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/tests' make[4]: Nothing to be done for 'all'. make[4]: Leaving directory '/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/tests' ============================================================================ Testsuite summary for maxima 5.41.0 ============================================================================ # TOTAL: 1 # PASS: 0 # SKIP: 0 # XFAIL: 0 # FAIL: 1 # XPASS: 0 # ERROR: 0 ============================================================================ See tests/test-suite.log ============================================================================ make[3]: *** [Makefile:558: test-suite.log] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory '/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/tests' make[2]: *** [Makefile:666: check-TESTS] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory '/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/tests' make[1]: *** [Makefile:792: check-am] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/tests' make: *** [Makefile:457: check-recursive] Error 1 phase `check' failed after 261.2 seconds builder for `/gnu/store/cmz95fkz1mc7nb3yxch4x83iaxml6gzs-maxima-5.41.0.drv' failed with exit code 1 @ build-failed /gnu/store/cmz95fkz1mc7nb3yxch4x83iaxml6gzs-maxima-5.41.0.drv - 1 builder for `/gnu/store/cmz95fkz1mc7nb3yxch4x83iaxml6gzs-maxima-5.41.0.drv' failed with exit code 1 guix build: error: build failed: build of `/gnu/store/cmz95fkz1mc7nb3yxch4x83iaxml6gzs-maxima-5.41.0.drv' failed --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain I am running GuixSD on a x86_64 machine (commit: 9ce07f2dbafe068aea81e79decc4cfc146a48259). The x86_64 version also failed to build on hydra.gnu.org (https://hydra.gnu.org/build/2361466). Greetings Diego --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 01 12:45:32 2017 Received: (at 29516) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Dec 2017 17:45:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40351 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eKpNU-0004az-5w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 12:45:32 -0500 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:36549) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eKpNR-0004aq-KV for 29516@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 12:45:30 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 225D220B4C; Fri, 1 Dec 2017 12:45:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 01 Dec 2017 12:45:29 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= mesmtp; bh=7U7UhZEwe0S4P851W3WN3j+Kz/FgMduEoeeIxCGe16Q=; b=WkE1V Cvqv6aOa3AhAb/6BloLbucnyuY5lwr6/JaIezufBXdso/+3bH1BkDL5tqlyBimwR Ip4xAXfg3+teLMleZV6GbOac2ySVDF/WaZwYMpyx4gbMerWtqGNUDLfa7Dy8PyY5 rU9Trmfy4c7VuukfpTyspn73RQTZmKcOwRuyBU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=7U7UhZEwe0S4P851W3WN3j+Kz/FgM duEoeeIxCGe16Q=; b=rSevLsDELBobfjxbcPR6trPbjxZA3SxQoNC2Jf67x1gk0 WnfUSniKI2rf8PMpmBrnboS2pLbGj+F6DMjsZo7AIQ3pI2aHo4rEcj4CTtxPkD5s 7eKj3eJlKubgylBKW2xS5fqg37hPURc/RyLKD2kjDlMMgFJ0nyj8tGrv32omc/Ci njDMbK6sp/UlfkWSKtKmXMZvJVMYTmVFrxFYaemBjJ7Nvqv421ZtOEdj5EHnefn6 n0BJwZ6s8S8h6M1Lk2WK0KVlQxXGmV9re3GjjznNabm2EtABSZi+ciVhvV1t05ZM VFvUwbr2pc+57KSNUW6R05PIBj2DrbqxWAqAUmQkQ== X-ME-Sender: Received: from localhost (unknown [172.58.200.9]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B894F7FAF6; Fri, 1 Dec 2017 12:45:28 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 12:45:27 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: Diego Nicola Barbato Subject: Re: bug#29516: Maxima fails to build Message-ID: <20171201174527.GA4636@jasmine.lan> References: <87po7y1zzm.fsf@GlaDOS.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87po7y1zzm.fsf@GlaDOS.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29516 Cc: 29516@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 11:53:01AM +0100, Diego Nicola Barbato wrote: > `guix build maxima' fails during the `check' phase with the following > output: Thanks for your report! > Testsuite summary for maxima 5.41.0 > ============================================================================ > # TOTAL: 1 > # PASS: 0 > # SKIP: 0 > # XFAIL: 0 > # FAIL: 1 > # XPASS: 0 > # ERROR: 0 > ============================================================================ > See tests/test-suite.log > ============================================================================ Can you retry the build with '--keep-failed' and send the 'tests/test-suite.log' file that will be in the directory of the failed build? And if that log's messages about the failing test refer to another log file, please send that one too. --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlohlTQACgkQJkb6MLrK fwjm0hAAsvg+4r7RUOeQ0e2fYUDOn9gcEYgWA6Z1UrGByNg5s08XZOgQ5J/SW/Jn tJS9BxFytYLkMMBgH8b8P5JajTnPCEmGSwFSeYEwmjA5UZ9nW+nYrPEqTCcff4Uc R4qD8Qn4Eoq+kbOtHVEO1pS8n3T9Qznhst2rqa3v+SujeHEhCf/QNZM3UslkEVll cPojN1+OPMcV09EQ3P3ITcZrBc7teu7ud2vU2iNOD1i7jn+up9P1SEB6iCb6Eh3l Jve5mJg59rC5NGaUENYdy6vooJosiezShON/2L7VpOhxSECJEDJ3rrp+EPQ16GzL T1NM2sbz7g9WmptXSxA0iAMJrnPz21Iuv/iGgPS14JMG3BsmmGNSv2UeCYY8VBmJ HfLhQ2uQVEdw9qrUMEgJnn9rdnA3/28EH4CbPtN6hrAkJ+QdLiITN9tI2t9gdl78 V5BrqcsZjTBo6bGTIjLWmwIkJgsRkwVrtMHamI/q4RZAyFSKu8aUSENdTMfztkNd PYI8jSRgtLJ8hFQei1wI4clf7vkTcx0vxyI+2xXiQfwFdLUf1kOTyoqVhLJPgNsC 7mMbLyUaM6S1xOrGVzMjLCQfzchKStyNo6pYpsxJfJ8Go7GKnNyqNavBl4k0nKHy zZd7tq7V2S+hHcq/L4qQXqH9JxJHA0KIzL1ZkGCIh8lcXqTI0vo= =ko6O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 01 16:14:00 2017 Received: (at 29516) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Dec 2017 21:14:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40611 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eKsdC-00055S-Qz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 16:13:59 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:53556) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eKsdA-00055E-Dc for 29516@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 16:13:57 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 445C320E66 for <29516@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 1 Dec 2017 22:13:47 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1512162830; bh=2oxUg4pSXF9wIEyg2J3jAssOrcracI/E9V8ZZ4NFXIM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=IitprOj4jPeAdfo4zyCpiJ7ZU0HhNj0Zt18CY8PUqc4MVvG7HFoIs+rzzL7dkI/+t nC53e+fOluTHMyLj2h+amBfNp4htOrTdTIkIgDx/89ll8MRRt2sbZLpDR3XoeCmkBe BGtrf0igQBkQFiIcluTy9fP+RYcPXDK56Q9qFjb2z4n3gS15A97xovesNTdzRebJ1C J7QahxXaCfQTTkUu3TfZiBTKMrUE5/PleYpdUwJvDbKros8rjEJJMoghthhDLswYwX XRhB+f0MMSlfnlk0EpVOa5VlA8yKq3U6yqSka/7UTeWoU0YNDStC/mO069P3qOH2bW yxvebPjpuCePw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3ypRpM24V3z9rxD; Fri, 1 Dec 2017 22:13:46 +0100 (CET) From: Diego Nicola Barbato To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: bug#29516: Maxima fails to build References: <87po7y1zzm.fsf@GlaDOS.home> <20171201174527.GA4636@jasmine.lan> Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2017 22:13:45 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20171201174527.GA4636@jasmine.lan> (Leo Famulari's message of "Fri, 1 Dec 2017 12:45:27 -0500") Message-ID: <877eu61792.fsf@GlaDOS.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29516 Cc: 29516@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Leo Famulari writes: > On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 11:53:01AM +0100, Diego Nicola Barbato wrote: >> `guix build maxima' fails during the `check' phase with the following >> output: > > Thanks for your report! > >> Testsuite summary for maxima 5.41.0 >> ============================================================================ >> # TOTAL: 1 >> # PASS: 0 >> # SKIP: 0 >> # XFAIL: 0 >> # FAIL: 1 >> # XPASS: 0 >> # ERROR: 0 >> ============================================================================ >> See tests/test-suite.log >> ============================================================================ > > Can you retry the build with '--keep-failed' and send the > 'tests/test-suite.log' file that will be in the directory of the failed > build? As requested I ran `build' with `--keep-failed'. This is the resulting log file: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline; filename=test-suite.log Content-Description: tests/test-suite.log ========================================= maxima 5.41.0: tests/test-suite.log ========================================= # TOTAL: 1 # PASS: 0 # SKIP: 0 # XFAIL: 0 # FAIL: 1 # XPASS: 0 # ERROR: 0 .. contents:: :depth: 2 FAIL: gcl-test.sh ================= Maxima 5.41.0 http://maxima.sourceforge.net using Lisp GNU Common Lisp (GCL) GCL 2.6.12 Distributed under the GNU Public License. See the file COPYING. Dedicated to the memory of William Schelter. The function bug_report() provides bug reporting information. (%i1) run_testsuite() Running tests in rtest_rules: 103/103 tests passed Running tests in rtestnset: 601/601 tests passed Running tests in rtest1: 186/186 tests passed (not counting 3 expected errors) Running tests in rtest1a: 34/34 tests passed (not counting 1 expected errors) Running tests in rtest2: 268/268 tests passed (not counting 2 expected errors) Running tests in rtest4: 93/93 tests passed Running tests in rtest5: 83/83 tests passed Running tests in rtest6: 39/39 tests passed Running tests in rtest6a: 62/62 tests passed Running tests in rtest6b: 27/27 tests passed Running tests in rtest7: 85/85 tests passed Running tests in rtest9: 89/89 tests passed Running tests in rtest9a: 76/76 tests passed Running tests in rtest10: 62/62 tests passed (not counting 2 expected errors) Running tests in rtest11: 243/243 tests passed (not counting 3 expected errors) Running tests in rtest13: 23/23 tests passed Running tests in rtest13s: 17/17 tests passed Running tests in rtest14: 418/418 tests passed Running tests in rtest15: ********************** Problem 55 *************** Input: compile(f) Result: warning: encountered undefined variable qwerty in translation. Compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_0.lsp. End of Pass 1. End of Pass 2. OPTIMIZE levels: Safety=2, Space=3, Speed=3 Finished compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_0.o. error-catch This differed from the expected result: [f] ********************** Problem 61 *************** Input: compile(f) Result: Compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_1.lsp. End of Pass 1. End of Pass 2. OPTIMIZE levels: Safety=2, Space=3, Speed=3 Finished compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_1.o. error-catch This differed from the expected result: [f] ********************** Problem 67 *************** Input: compile(f) Result: Compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_2.lsp. End of Pass 1. End of Pass 2. OPTIMIZE levels: Safety=2, Space=3, Speed=3 Finished compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_2.o. error-catch This differed from the expected result: [f] ********************** Problem 73 *************** Input: compile(f) Result: warning: encountered undefined variable qwerty in translation. Compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_3.lsp. End of Pass 1. End of Pass 2. OPTIMIZE levels: Safety=2, Space=3, Speed=3 Finished compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_3.o. error-catch This differed from the expected result: [f] ********************** Problem 79 *************** Input: compile(f) Result: warning: encountered undefined variable qwerty in translation. Compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_4.lsp. End of Pass 1. End of Pass 2. OPTIMIZE levels: Safety=2, Space=3, Speed=3 Finished compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_4.o. error-catch This differed from the expected result: [f] ********************** Problem 85 *************** Input: compile(f) Result: Compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_5.lsp. End of Pass 1. End of Pass 2. OPTIMIZE levels: Safety=2, Space=3, Speed=3 Finished compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_5.o. error-catch This differed from the expected result: [f] ********************** Problem 91 *************** Input: compile(f) Result: Compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_6.lsp. End of Pass 1. End of Pass 2. OPTIMIZE levels: Safety=2, Space=3, Speed=3 Finished compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_6.o. error-catch This differed from the expected result: [f] ********************** Problem 164 *************** Input: compile(aref) Result: Compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_7.lsp. End of Pass 1. End of Pass 2. OPTIMIZE levels: Safety=2, Space=3, Speed=3 Finished compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_7.o. error-catch This differed from the expected result: [aref] ********************** Problem 173 *************** Input: compile(foo) Result: Compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_8.lsp. End of Pass 1. End of Pass 2. OPTIMIZE levels: Safety=2, Space=3, Speed=3 Finished compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_8.o. error-catch This differed from the expected result: [foo] 358/367 tests passed The following 9 problems failed: (55 61 67 73 79 85 91 164 173) Running tests in rtest16: 616/616 tests passed Running tests in rtestode: 95/95 tests passed Running tests in rtestode_zp: 30/30 tests passed Running tests in rtest3: 157/157 tests passed Running tests in rtest8: ********************** Problem 133 *************** Input: (compile(foo17), first(quad_qags(foo17, u, - 1, 0))) Result: Compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_9.lsp. End of Pass 1. End of Pass 2. OPTIMIZE levels: Safety=2, Space=3, Speed=3 Finished compiling /tmp/gazonk_4051_9.o. error-catch This differed from the expected result: - 0.359753467469551 173/174 tests passed The following 1 problem failed: (133) Running tests in rtest12: 79/79 tests passed (not counting 2 expected errors) Running tests in rexamples: 137/137 tests passed Running tests in rtesthyp: 423/423 tests passed (not counting 6 expected errors) Running tests in rtest_hypgeo: 291/291 tests passed (not counting 1 expected errors) Running tests in rtestmt19937: 15/15 tests passed Running tests in rtest_allnummod: 548/548 tests passed Running tests in rtestconjugate: 136/136 tests passed Running tests in rtestsum: 306/306 tests passed (not counting 4 expected errors) Running tests in rtest_trig: 160/160 tests passed Running tests in rtest_zeta: 22/22 tests passed Running tests in rtest_diff_invtrig: 22/22 tests passed Running tests in rtest_scalarp: 20/20 tests passed Running tests in rtest_everysome: 84/84 tests passed Running tests in rtestint: 309/309 tests passed Running tests in rtest_numth: 201/201 tests passed Running tests in rtestifactor: 25/25 tests passed Running tests in rtest_equal: 207/207 tests passed (not counting 2 expected errors) Running tests in rtest_abs: 140/140 tests passed Running tests in rtest_taylor: 149/149 tests passed (not counting 6 expected errors) Running tests in rtest_dot: 60/60 tests passed Running tests in rtest_mset: 112/112 tests passed Running tests in rtest_boolean: 116/116 tests passed Running tests in rtest_round: 101/101 tests passed Running tests in rtest_map: 118/118 tests passed (not counting 3 expected errors) Running tests in rtest_sign: 357/357 tests passed (not counting 7 expected errors) Running tests in rtest_algebraic: 45/45 tests passed Running tests in rtest_gamma: 761/761 tests passed Running tests in rtest_expintegral: 210/210 tests passed Running tests in rtest_signum: 59/59 tests passed Running tests in rtest_lambert_w: 57/57 tests passed Running tests in rtest_elliptic: 179/179 tests passed (not counting 2 expected errors) Running tests in rtest_integrate: 812/812 tests passed Running tests in rtest_integrate_special: 53/53 tests passed Running tests in rtest_sqrt: 313/313 tests passed (not counting 1 expected errors) Running tests in rtest_carg: 55/55 tests passed (not counting 2 expected errors) Running tests in rtest_log: 129/129 tests passed Running tests in rtest_power: 72/72 tests passed (not counting 5 expected errors) Running tests in rtestdefstruct: 32/32 tests passed Running tests in rtest_limit: 214/214 tests passed Running tests in rtest_powerseries: 67/67 tests passed Running tests in rtest_laplace: 98/98 tests passed (not counting 11 expected errors) Running tests in rtest_plotoptions: 5/5 tests passed Running tests in rtest_algsys: 56/56 tests passed Error summary: Errors found in /tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/tests/rtest15.mac, problems: (55 61 67 73 79 85 91 164 173) Error found in /tmp/guix-build-maxima-5.41.0.drv-0/maxima-5.41.0/tests/rtest8.mac, problem: (133) 10 tests failed out of 11,303 total tests. real time : 218.919 secs run-gbc time : 166.080 secs child run time : 17.440 secs gbc time : 23.620 secs (%o0) done --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 02 12:05:04 2017 Received: (at 29516) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Dec 2017 17:05:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42152 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eLBDs-0008Cm-6y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2017 12:05:04 -0500 Received: from world.peace.net ([50.252.239.5]:51124) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eLBDp-0008C6-Ii for 29516@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2017 12:05:02 -0500 Received: from pool-72-93-29-217.bstnma.east.verizon.net ([72.93.29.217] helo=jojen) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eLBDj-00088B-IG; Sat, 02 Dec 2017 12:04:55 -0500 From: Mark H Weaver To: Diego Nicola Barbato Subject: Re: bug#29516: Maxima fails to build References: <87po7y1zzm.fsf@GlaDOS.home> <20171201174527.GA4636@jasmine.lan> <877eu61792.fsf@GlaDOS.home> Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2017 12:04:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: <877eu61792.fsf@GlaDOS.home> (Diego Nicola Barbato's message of "Fri, 01 Dec 2017 22:13:45 +0100") Message-ID: <874lp912or.fsf@netris.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29516 Cc: 29516@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Diego Nicola Barbato writes: > Leo Famulari writes: > >> On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 11:53:01AM +0100, Diego Nicola Barbato wrote: >>> `guix build maxima' fails during the `check' phase with the following >>> output: >> >> Thanks for your report! FYI, the Maxima builds started failing after the recent upgrade to 'gcl'. I raised the issue here: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-11/msg00341.html The person who upgraded 'gcl' first said that he could reproduce the build failure locally, and then said that he couldn't. I'm not sure what happened there. Mark From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 03 09:58:50 2017 Received: (at 29516) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Dec 2017 14:58:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43505 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eLVjG-0002Vi-DX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Dec 2017 09:58:50 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:38074) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eLVjF-0002VS-2j for 29516@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Dec 2017 09:58:49 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBB11210DC for <29516@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 3 Dec 2017 15:58:41 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1512313122; bh=yVY62m65Z+F0RG29pJXf05R9R6yQ//7z7cvGfgkPQ6M=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=Pvnswfo2i+4lBEKdFjlEbVQlEn8ncgSNqBs4SpeQX92esZaND7SskQ+QmBfUS+zjg I/h85322WksFzT1bWurtIouUQUf7NHOAw6PFgkOo/ow/8iFzmn743xDeUaw0Ajmk3J V6qgp0Ne4t6K0icbuyluTJ6uQJ98hzco3vL3Tn+3lWtUPOU6LIXG7F6pvLb2qBqxbT D4b+SW1YH8zeUO5cH1OiEOjt3+Ye9+Ye391xWBS7P22+C1/+qNmQ50AtW5UDhlRDUD O2VxdYJULL6LAOkt/Q3eKIVE2yu1tA7yO6Q3ccDkpaxNbqeoRqY36jl9NexF236LiH eEzS7xc9Lc3IA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3yqWNd0SgPz9rxm; Sun, 3 Dec 2017 15:58:38 +0100 (CET) From: Diego Nicola Barbato To: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: bug#29516: Maxima fails to build References: <87po7y1zzm.fsf@GlaDOS.home> <20171201174527.GA4636@jasmine.lan> <877eu61792.fsf@GlaDOS.home> <874lp912or.fsf@netris.org> Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2017 15:58:38 +0100 In-Reply-To: <874lp912or.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Sat, 02 Dec 2017 12:04:36 -0500") Message-ID: <87wp23oo2p.fsf@GlaDOS.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29516 Cc: 29516@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Mark H Weaver writes: > Diego Nicola Barbato writes: > >> Leo Famulari writes: >> >>> On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 11:53:01AM +0100, Diego Nicola Barbato wrote: >>>> `guix build maxima' fails during the `check' phase with the following >>>> output: >>> >>> Thanks for your report! > > FYI, the Maxima builds started failing after the recent upgrade to > 'gcl'. I raised the issue here: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-11/msg00341.html > > The person who upgraded 'gcl' first said that he could reproduce the > build failure locally, and then said that he couldn't. I'm not sure > what happened there. > > Mark This seems to be quite a strange issue indeed: Out of curiosity I tried the same thing in a VM (guix system vm-image) and even though it is the same architecture (x86_64) and the same commit (e2721a05e7d778bdf845b7cb7a42fd9f76095b69) guix consistently succeeds to build maxima in the VM while it consistently fails to build on my laptop. I also tried building with only one core on my laptop and running the VM with two cores (qemu-system-x86_64 -smp cores=2) with the same result. `guix build maxima' only fails on the VM when I run it with `--rounds=2' because the outputs differ. Diego From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 15 04:04:50 2019 Received: (at 29516-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Feb 2019 09:04:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48585 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1guZQQ-0005uE-Fv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 04:04:50 -0500 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:42175) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1guZQN-0005tt-Bz for 29516-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 04:04:49 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53DD424015C for <29516-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 10:04:25 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1550221465; bh=LYiU1ZnP6s+fPQLedSNMeR3aZhmsulDkv4IOGe4mmTs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=D1DbAFWl/dTaQQzYzAVn4CYoB8uAzOzJFnQDQ4S4ewbHkxqEnD2sAlllB6RE6IpfZ 5huvpPqSfRgOrGRqtUIShyWnl56SPCZnl0pttQW006PokjiW/khQ2zg1hn+Q2neenw 4vQczhvQBHS5k5fcW4jVWEWf/LFLy3AvacCI52mwFz0ZrskTniWPTb8gJeMgeD/bJN FMgN69PwvccsnhsWdQH7hHwvRN2UvzczHV3NwXdb9YaS86bZJOUpeM0000DkS4Tg0N o6qq822U6a0XxrDX7kRVaFbusL4jCog8k2pu25HYHJbTlWRTVbVRtaRmpg7caYd8R9 zZ3p3fRtilLdQ== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4416kb2JPcz9rxD for <29516-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 10:03:51 +0100 (CET) From: Diego Nicola Barbato To: 29516-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: Maxima fails to build Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 10:03:49 +0100 Message-ID: <8736opift6.fsf@GlaDOS.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29516-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hello Guix, I am closing this bug in response to Leo=E2=80=99s message on guix-devel [0= ]. This particular issue has been solved quite some time ago and GCL and Maxima have both been updated since. Maxima currently fails to build for a different reason for which I have opened a new bug report [1]. Regards, Diego [0]: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2019-02/msg00220.html [1]: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D34484 From unknown Fri Aug 15 14:48:40 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator