From unknown Sat Sep 20 04:10:02 2025 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#2942: rmail unable to get new mail from a Babyl file Reply-To: Glenn Morris , 2942@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:25:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 2942 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.12393117854273 (code B ref -1); Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:25:04 +0000 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 9 Apr 2009 21:16:25 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=4.0 tests=FOURLA,MDO_DATING14, X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n39LGJcV004254 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 14:16:20 -0700 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ls1bf-0002Bu-0L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:16:19 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ls1bZ-00028n-NM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:16:17 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34352 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ls1bZ-00028e-G5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:16:13 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:51285) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ls1bZ-0006uL-8O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:16:13 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Ls1bZ-0000wv-2k; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:16:13 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Spook: chameleon man Clinton rail gun Lexis-Nexis eavesdropping X-Ran: lJY[E4fhB!YN|Wl}`l/C8UbMwsaRJRZ X-Hue: red X-Attribution: GM Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:16:12 -0400 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) Severity: serious Let `foo' be a Babyl format mail file: emacs -Q C-u M-x rmail RET foo RET works fine. The individual messages are processed correctly. emacs -Q M-x rmail RET C-u g foo RET does not work correctly. Emacs says "No mail". If the RMAIL buffer was empty originally, the raw Babyl file is dumped into the buffer. If there was mail originally, there is no apparent change in the RMAIL buffer, but the Babyl file is invisibly appended to the end of the file. At the least, Emacs should refuse to get new mail from a Babyl file if it cannot handle it. Preferably, it should be able to handle it. (This is unrelated to the latest Rmail changes.) From unknown Sat Sep 20 04:10:02 2025 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#2942: rmail unable to get new mail from a Babyl file Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii , 2942@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 22:20:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 2942 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 2942-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B2942.123931522422727 (code B ref 2942); Thu, 09 Apr 2009 22:20:04 +0000 Received: (at 2942) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 9 Apr 2009 22:13:44 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER,MDO_DATING14 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from mtaout5.012.net.il (mtaout5.012.net.il [84.95.2.13]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n39MDemi022721 for <2942@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 15:13:41 -0700 Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout5.012.net.il by i_mtaout5.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KHU00000TJFE600@i_mtaout5.012.net.il> for 2942@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 01:13:34 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.70.19]) by i_mtaout5.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KHU001CWTQL5HI0@i_mtaout5.012.net.il>; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 01:13:34 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 01:13:33 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Glenn Morris , 2942@debbugs.gnu.org Message-id: <83tz4x327m.fsf@gnu.org> References: > From: Glenn Morris > Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:16:12 -0400 > Cc: > > emacs -Q > M-x rmail RET > C-u g foo RET > > does not work correctly. Emacs says "No mail". > > If the RMAIL buffer was empty originally, the raw Babyl file is dumped > into the buffer. Where did the Babyl file come in the first place? From unknown Sat Sep 20 04:10:02 2025 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#2942: rmail unable to get new mail from a Babyl file Reply-To: Glenn Morris , 2942@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 23:30:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 2942 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 2942-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B2942.123931942812984 (code B ref 2942); Thu, 09 Apr 2009 23:30:04 +0000 Received: (at 2942) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 9 Apr 2009 23:23:48 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER,MDO_DATING14, X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n39NNjvm012976 for <2942@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 16:23:46 -0700 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Ls3az-0008CB-6v; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:23:45 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 2942@debbugs.gnu.org References: <83tz4x327m.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spook: AIMSX clandestine SEAL Team 6 condor MD5 SAFE FSF Consul X-Ran: dT1Ad/gzsMk>x+kzn1\0?Ft!)DmP.S@J~1-|^Sf>"dCWpKZAP6q+X%1/$#)vd+9x|GD@0; X-Hue: blue X-Attribution: GM Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:23:45 -0400 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Where did the Babyl file come in the first place? >From Emacs 22.3. (I'm not sure what you're getting at.) Emacs 22.3 `C-u g' will happily take either a Babyl or mbox file as input, converting it to the appropriate format. I don't see why this should be different now. From unknown Sat Sep 20 04:10:02 2025 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#2942: rmail unable to get new mail from a Babyl file Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii , 2942@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 07:05:06 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 2942 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 2942-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B2942.123934657816830 (code B ref 2942); Fri, 10 Apr 2009 07:05:06 +0000 Received: (at 2942) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 10 Apr 2009 06:56:18 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER,MDO_DATING14 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from mtaout1.012.net.il (mtaout1.012.net.il [84.95.2.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n3A6uE02016814 for <2942@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 23:56:15 -0700 Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout1.012.net.il by i-mtaout1.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KHV00400HOA6F00@i-mtaout1.012.net.il> for 2942@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 09:56:08 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.70.19]) by i-mtaout1.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KHV00536HXJ0N80@i-mtaout1.012.net.il>; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 09:56:08 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 09:56:08 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Glenn Morris Cc: 2942@debbugs.gnu.org Message-id: <83skkh2e0n.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83tz4x327m.fsf@gnu.org> > From: Glenn Morris > Cc: 2942@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com > Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:23:45 -0400 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Where did the Babyl file come in the first place? > > From Emacs 22.3. (I'm not sure what you're getting at.) I was confused: I didn't notice the C-u, and thought you were getting new mail from the system mailbox (which shouldn't be a Babyl file). > Emacs 22.3 `C-u g' will happily take either a Babyl or mbox file as > input, converting it to the appropriate format. I don't see why this > should be different now. Yes, I agree. From unknown Sat Sep 20 04:10:02 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.420 (Entity 5.420) X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (Emacs bug Tracking System) To: Glenn Morris Subject: bug#2942 closed by Eli Zaretskii (Re: bug#2942: rmail unable to get new mail from a Babyl file) Message-ID: References: <83myao3hv3.fsf@gnu.org> X-Emacs-PR-Message: they-closed 2942 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs Reply-To: 2942@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:55:10 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1239360910-23366-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1239360910-23366-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report which was filed against the emacs package: #2942: rmail unable to get new mail from a Babyl file It has been closed by Eli Zaretskii . Their explanation is attached below along with your original report. If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate message then please contact Eli Zaretskii by replying to this email. --=20 2942: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D2942 Emacs Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1239360910-23366-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 2942-done) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 10 Apr 2009 10:48:21 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER,MDO_DATING14 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from mtaout6.012.net.il (mtaout6.012.net.il [84.95.2.16]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n3AAmHpX021557 for <2942-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 03:48:19 -0700 Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout6.012.net.il by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KHV00B00SFJXC00@i-mtaout6.012.net.il> for 2942-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:47:47 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.70.19]) by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KHV00CAGSNJ1C60@i-mtaout6.012.net.il>; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:47:47 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:47:44 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#2942: rmail unable to get new mail from a Babyl file In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Glenn Morris Cc: 2942-done@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83myao3hv3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83tz4x327m.fsf@gnu.org> > From: Glenn Morris > Cc: 2942@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com > Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:23:45 -0400 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Where did the Babyl file come in the first place? > > From Emacs 22.3. (I'm not sure what you're getting at.) > > Emacs 22.3 `C-u g' will happily take either a Babyl or mbox file as > input, converting it to the appropriate format. I don't see why this > should be different now. I think I fixed it. Please try the latest CVS. (There's an unrelated -- or so I think -- bug in unrmail, whereby some messages are badly converted from Babyl -- e.g., they get two X-RMAIL-ATTRIBUTES headers. But that happens even if you type "C-u M-x rmail RET foo RET". I'm working on this.) ------------=_1239360910-23366-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 9 Apr 2009 21:16:25 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=4.0 tests=FOURLA,MDO_DATING14, X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n39LGJcV004254 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 14:16:20 -0700 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ls1bf-0002Bu-0L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:16:19 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ls1bZ-00028n-NM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:16:17 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34352 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ls1bZ-00028e-G5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:16:13 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:51285) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ls1bZ-0006uL-8O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:16:13 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Ls1bZ-0000wv-2k; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:16:13 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: rmail unable to get new mail from a Babyl file X-Spook: chameleon man Clinton rail gun Lexis-Nexis eavesdropping X-Ran: lJY[E4fhB!YN|Wl}`l/C8UbMwsaRJRZ X-Hue: red X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:16:12 -0400 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) Severity: serious Let `foo' be a Babyl format mail file: emacs -Q C-u M-x rmail RET foo RET works fine. The individual messages are processed correctly. emacs -Q M-x rmail RET C-u g foo RET does not work correctly. Emacs says "No mail". If the RMAIL buffer was empty originally, the raw Babyl file is dumped into the buffer. If there was mail originally, there is no apparent change in the RMAIL buffer, but the Babyl file is invisibly appended to the end of the file. At the least, Emacs should refuse to get new mail from a Babyl file if it cannot handle it. Preferably, it should be able to handle it. (This is unrelated to the latest Rmail changes.) ------------=_1239360910-23366-1-- From unknown Sat Sep 20 04:10:02 2025 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Subject: bug#2942: rmail unable to get new mail from a Babyl file Reply-To: Glenn Morris , 2942@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Resent-To: bug-submit-list@lists.donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 00:05:13 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 2942 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 2942-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B2942.1239407841461 (code B ref 2942); Sat, 11 Apr 2009 00:05:13 +0000 Received: (at 2942) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 10 Apr 2009 23:57:21 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER,MDO_DATING14, X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n3ANvIa1000449 for <2942@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:57:19 -0700 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LsQaz-0003aT-EW; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:57:17 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18911.56541.329273.385895@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:57:17 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 2942@debbugs.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <83myao3hv3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83tz4x327m.fsf@gnu.org> <83myao3hv3.fsf@gnu.org> X-Attribution: GM X-Mailer: VM (www.wonderworks.com/vm), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs) X-Hue: red X-Ran: ~)VVkhra7.0[MNT$1Kml@DSH+:B0?pBG"?|W0AbH1|;B.}w2Pypf~[)mB Eli Zaretskii wrote (on Fri, 10 Apr 2009 at 13:47 +0300): > I think I fixed it. Please try the latest CVS. Works for me. Thanks.