From rgm@gnu.org Thu Apr 9 14:16:25 2009 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 9 Apr 2009 21:16:25 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=4.0 tests=FOURLA,MDO_DATING14, X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n39LGJcV004254 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 14:16:20 -0700 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ls1bf-0002Bu-0L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:16:19 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ls1bZ-00028n-NM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:16:17 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34352 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ls1bZ-00028e-G5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:16:13 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:51285) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ls1bZ-0006uL-8O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:16:13 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Ls1bZ-0000wv-2k; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:16:13 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: rmail unable to get new mail from a Babyl file X-Spook: chameleon man Clinton rail gun Lexis-Nexis eavesdropping X-Ran: lJY[E4fhB!YN|Wl}`l/C8UbMwsaRJRZ X-Hue: red X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:16:12 -0400 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) Severity: serious Let `foo' be a Babyl format mail file: emacs -Q C-u M-x rmail RET foo RET works fine. The individual messages are processed correctly. emacs -Q M-x rmail RET C-u g foo RET does not work correctly. Emacs says "No mail". If the RMAIL buffer was empty originally, the raw Babyl file is dumped into the buffer. If there was mail originally, there is no apparent change in the RMAIL buffer, but the Babyl file is invisibly appended to the end of the file. At the least, Emacs should refuse to get new mail from a Babyl file if it cannot handle it. Preferably, it should be able to handle it. (This is unrelated to the latest Rmail changes.) From eliz@gnu.org Thu Apr 9 15:13:44 2009 Received: (at 2942) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 9 Apr 2009 22:13:44 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER,MDO_DATING14 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from mtaout5.012.net.il (mtaout5.012.net.il [84.95.2.13]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n39MDemi022721 for <2942@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 15:13:41 -0700 Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout5.012.net.il by i_mtaout5.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KHU00000TJFE600@i_mtaout5.012.net.il> for 2942@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 01:13:34 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.70.19]) by i_mtaout5.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KHU001CWTQL5HI0@i_mtaout5.012.net.il>; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 01:13:34 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 01:13:33 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#2942: rmail unable to get new mail from a Babyl file In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Glenn Morris , 2942@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83tz4x327m.fsf@gnu.org> References: > From: Glenn Morris > Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:16:12 -0400 > Cc: > > emacs -Q > M-x rmail RET > C-u g foo RET > > does not work correctly. Emacs says "No mail". > > If the RMAIL buffer was empty originally, the raw Babyl file is dumped > into the buffer. Where did the Babyl file come in the first place? From rgm@gnu.org Thu Apr 9 16:23:48 2009 Received: (at 2942) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 9 Apr 2009 23:23:48 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER,MDO_DATING14, X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n39NNjvm012976 for <2942@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 16:23:46 -0700 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Ls3az-0008CB-6v; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:23:45 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 2942@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#2942: rmail unable to get new mail from a Babyl file References: <83tz4x327m.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spook: AIMSX clandestine SEAL Team 6 condor MD5 SAFE FSF Consul X-Ran: dT1Ad/gzsMk>x+kzn1\0?Ft!)DmP.S@J~1-|^Sf>"dCWpKZAP6q+X%1/$#)vd+9x|GD@0; X-Hue: blue X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:23:45 -0400 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Where did the Babyl file come in the first place? >From Emacs 22.3. (I'm not sure what you're getting at.) Emacs 22.3 `C-u g' will happily take either a Babyl or mbox file as input, converting it to the appropriate format. I don't see why this should be different now. From eliz@gnu.org Thu Apr 9 23:56:18 2009 Received: (at 2942) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 10 Apr 2009 06:56:18 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER,MDO_DATING14 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from mtaout1.012.net.il (mtaout1.012.net.il [84.95.2.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n3A6uE02016814 for <2942@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 23:56:15 -0700 Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout1.012.net.il by i-mtaout1.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KHV00400HOA6F00@i-mtaout1.012.net.il> for 2942@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 09:56:08 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.70.19]) by i-mtaout1.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KHV00536HXJ0N80@i-mtaout1.012.net.il>; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 09:56:08 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 09:56:08 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#2942: rmail unable to get new mail from a Babyl file In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Glenn Morris Cc: 2942@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83skkh2e0n.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83tz4x327m.fsf@gnu.org> > From: Glenn Morris > Cc: 2942@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com > Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:23:45 -0400 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Where did the Babyl file come in the first place? > > From Emacs 22.3. (I'm not sure what you're getting at.) I was confused: I didn't notice the C-u, and thought you were getting new mail from the system mailbox (which shouldn't be a Babyl file). > Emacs 22.3 `C-u g' will happily take either a Babyl or mbox file as > input, converting it to the appropriate format. I don't see why this > should be different now. Yes, I agree. From eliz@gnu.org Fri Apr 10 03:48:21 2009 Received: (at 2942-done) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 10 Apr 2009 10:48:21 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER,MDO_DATING14 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from mtaout6.012.net.il (mtaout6.012.net.il [84.95.2.16]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n3AAmHpX021557 for <2942-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 03:48:19 -0700 Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout6.012.net.il by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KHV00B00SFJXC00@i-mtaout6.012.net.il> for 2942-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:47:47 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.70.19]) by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KHV00CAGSNJ1C60@i-mtaout6.012.net.il>; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:47:47 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:47:44 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#2942: rmail unable to get new mail from a Babyl file In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Glenn Morris Cc: 2942-done@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83myao3hv3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83tz4x327m.fsf@gnu.org> > From: Glenn Morris > Cc: 2942@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com > Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:23:45 -0400 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Where did the Babyl file come in the first place? > > From Emacs 22.3. (I'm not sure what you're getting at.) > > Emacs 22.3 `C-u g' will happily take either a Babyl or mbox file as > input, converting it to the appropriate format. I don't see why this > should be different now. I think I fixed it. Please try the latest CVS. (There's an unrelated -- or so I think -- bug in unrmail, whereby some messages are badly converted from Babyl -- e.g., they get two X-RMAIL-ATTRIBUTES headers. But that happens even if you type "C-u M-x rmail RET foo RET". I'm working on this.) From rgm@gnu.org Fri Apr 10 16:57:21 2009 Received: (at 2942) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 10 Apr 2009 23:57:21 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER,MDO_DATING14, X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n3ANvIa1000449 for <2942@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:57:19 -0700 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LsQaz-0003aT-EW; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:57:17 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18911.56541.329273.385895@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:57:17 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 2942@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#2942: rmail unable to get new mail from a Babyl file In-Reply-To: <83myao3hv3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83tz4x327m.fsf@gnu.org> <83myao3hv3.fsf@gnu.org> X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM X-Mailer: VM (www.wonderworks.com/vm), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs) X-Hue: red X-Ran: ~)VVkhra7.0[MNT$1Kml@DSH+:B0?pBG"?|W0AbH1|;B.}w2Pypf~[)mB Eli Zaretskii wrote (on Fri, 10 Apr 2009 at 13:47 +0300): > I think I fixed it. Please try the latest CVS. Works for me. Thanks. From unknown Sat Sep 20 04:10:02 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: $requester Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 09 May 2009 14:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # A New Hope # A log time ago, in a galaxy far, far away # something happened. # # Magically this resulted in the following # action being taken, but this fake control # message doesn't tell you why it happened # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator