Subject: Re: bug#2941: rmail's new handling of Babyl files is odd

From: Glenn Morris <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:25:31 -0400

Richard M Stallman wrote:

> Remember that s also does expunge.  If you give two commands that can
> query, you may get two quieries.
>
> This says nothing about whether one command should query the user twice.
> I find your argument unpersuasive.

I reiterate:

C-u M-x rmail RET foo RET
d
s

is one command that prompts twice (with the patch you proposed).