GNU bug report logs -
#29347
27.0.50; C-g doesn't quit minibuffer
Previous Next
Reported by: rms <at> gnu.org
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 03:47:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Merged with 29370
Found in version 27.0.50
Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 23:14:16 +0200
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
> Cc: 29370 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 29347 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, rms <at> gnu.org
>
> > Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 18:17:58 +0200
> > From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
> > Cc: 29370 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 29347 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, rms <at> gnu.org
> >
> > I think I fixed the problem which caused Emacs to hang in this
> > particular scenario, but I'm not sure Richard is seeing the same
> > problem. The change I installed on the emacs-26 branch is below;
> > Richard, please try applying it, and see if your problems go away.
>
> Sorry, wrong patch. Please use the one below instead.
Sorry again, that was not the best idea. Here is a better patch:
diff --git a/src/thread.c b/src/thread.c
index 9e799ce..dd46681 100644
--- a/src/thread.c
+++ b/src/thread.c
@@ -578,8 +573,15 @@ really_call_select (void *arg)
sa->timeout, sa->sigmask);
block_interrupt_signal (&oldset);
- acquire_global_lock (self);
- self->not_holding_lock = 0;
+ /* If we were interrupted by C-g while inside sa->func above, the
+ signal handler could have called maybe_reacquire_global_lock, in
+ which case we are already holding the lock and shouldn't try
+ taking it again, or else we will hang forever. */
+ if (self->not_holding_lock)
+ {
+ acquire_global_lock (self);
+ self->not_holding_lock = 0;
+ }
restore_signal_mask (&oldset);
}
This bug report was last modified 7 years and 179 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.