GNU bug report logs -
#29334
25.3; compiled commands don't respect special interactive expressions
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
tags 29334 + patch
quit
Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org> writes:
> Bisected to a46481370, our old friend "Use lexical-binding".
How about this:
[0001-Fix-command-repetition-with-lexical-binding-Bug-2933.patch (text/x-diff, inline)]
From a8b43e98c592c84957ea304a0dc2d6423af9c5c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 21:57:09 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Fix command repetition with lexical-binding (Bug#29334)
`call-interactively' relies on analyzing the source of `interactive'
forms in order to preserve arguments like (region-end) in the command
history, rather than just storing the resulting position. However,
the byte-compiler does not preserve the source of the interactive form
when lexical-binding is in effect, because `call-interactively' would
evaluate the form with dynamic binding in that case.
To fix this, change `call-interactively' so that it checks compiled
functions for lexical-binding as well. Then the byte-compiler can
preserve the source of interactive forms regardless of the value of
lexical-binding.
* src/callint.c (Fcall_interactively): Functions compiled with
lexical-binding have their arglist encoded as an integer, use this to
choose the right kind of binding for compiled functions too.
* lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el (byte-compile-lambda): Preserve the
uncompiled form of the interactive form when lexical-binding is
enabled too.
---
lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el | 6 +-----
src/callint.c | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el
index 590db570c5..e16405f09b 100644
--- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el
+++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el
@@ -2823,11 +2823,7 @@ byte-compile-lambda
(while (consp (cdr form))
(setq form (cdr form)))
(setq form (car form)))
- (if (and (eq (car-safe form) 'list)
- ;; The spec is evalled in callint.c in dynamic-scoping
- ;; mode, so just leaving the form unchanged would mean
- ;; it won't be eval'd in the right mode.
- (not lexical-binding))
+ (if (eq (car-safe form) 'list)
nil
(setq int `(interactive ,newform)))))
((cdr int)
diff --git a/src/callint.c b/src/callint.c
index 5d88082e38..48ea9ba7a3 100644
--- a/src/callint.c
+++ b/src/callint.c
@@ -356,7 +356,9 @@ DEFUN ("call-interactively", Fcall_interactively, Scall_interactively, 1, 3, 0,
/* Compute the arg values using the user's expression. */
specs = Feval (specs,
CONSP (funval) && EQ (Qclosure, XCAR (funval))
- ? CAR_SAFE (XCDR (funval)) : Qnil);
+ ? CAR_SAFE (XCDR (funval))
+ : COMPILEDP (funval) && INTEGERP (AREF (funval, COMPILED_ARGLIST))
+ ? Qt : Qnil);
if (events != num_input_events || !NILP (record_flag))
{
/* We should record this command on the command history. */
--
2.11.0
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 131 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.