GNU bug report logs -
#29296
[PATCH 0/2] gexp: Add 'let-system'
Previous Next
Reported by: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 16:20:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #31 received at 29296 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org> writes:
> Hi Ludo,
>
> maybe a little off-topic, but why do I have to use the following patch on
> armhf-linux (*not* cross compiling) in order to stop it from pulling in
> i686-cross-gcc?
Can you give a little more context? Did this occur after the let-system
patch, or is this when using let-system?
Can you paste the derivation for mes <at> 0.19 in the context this occurs?
Also, please file a new bug report.
> Makes no sense to me at all...
If only all bugs were obvious, our jobs would be so much easier!
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/mes.scm b/gnu/packages/mes.scm
> index 347aef0..524b8e8 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/mes.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/mes.scm
> @@ -120,8 +120,9 @@ extensive examples, including parsers for the Javascript and C99 languages.")
> ((string-prefix? "x86_64-linux" target-system)
> ;; Use cross-compiler rather than #:system "i686-linux" to get
> ;; MesCC 64 bit .go files installed ready for use with Guile.
> - `(("i686-linux-binutils" ,(cross-binutils "i686-unknown-linux-gnu"))
> - ("i686-linux-gcc" ,(cross-gcc "i686-unknown-linux-gnu"))))
> + `( ;("i686-linux-binutils" ,(cross-binutils "i686-unknown-linux-gnu"))
> + ;("i686-linux-gcc" ,(cross-gcc "i686-unknown-linux-gnu"))
> +))
> (else
> '())))
> ("graphviz" ,graphviz)
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 5 years and 96 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.