GNU bug report logs -
#29287
tramp-test25-file-selinux fails
Previous Next
Reported by: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 19:31:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Found in version 26.0.90
Fixed in version 26.0.91
Done: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 29287 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 29287 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
michael.albinus <at> gmx.de, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#29287
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 13 Nov 2017 19:31:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #3 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Package: emacs
Version: 26.0.90
tramp-test25-file-selinux fails on RHEL7.4 with SELinux enabled.
Reporting as requested in the comment in the source file. :)
Test tramp-test25-file-selinux backtrace:
signal(ert-test-failed (((should-not (equal (file-selinux-context tm
ert-fail(((should-not (equal (file-selinux-context tmp-name1) (file-
(if (not (unwind-protect (setq value-4340 (apply fn-4338 args-4339))
(let (form-description-4342) (if (not (unwind-protect (setq value-43
(let ((value-4340 'ert-form-evaluation-aborted-4341)) (let (form-des
(let* ((fn-4338 (function equal)) (args-4339 (condition-case err (le
(progn (write-region "foo" nil tmp-name1) (let* ((fn-4318 (function
(unwind-protect (progn (write-region "foo" nil tmp-name1) (let* ((fn
(let ((tmp-name1 (tramp--test-make-temp-name nil quoted)) (tmp-name2
(let (quoted) (let ((tmp-name1 (tramp--test-make-temp-name nil quote
(closure (t) nil (let* ((fn-4308 (function tramp--test-enabled)) (ar
ert--run-test-internal(#s(ert--test-execution-info :test #s(ert-test
ert-run-test(#s(ert-test :name tramp-test25-file-selinux :documentat
ert-run-or-rerun-test(#s(ert--stats :selector (not (tag :expensive-t
ert-run-tests((not (tag :expensive-test)) #f(compiled-function (even
ert-run-tests-batch((not (tag :expensive-test)))
ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit((not (tag :expensive-test)))
eval((ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit '(not (tag :expensive-test))))
command-line-1(("-L" ":." "-l" "ert" "-l" "lisp/net/tramp-tests.el"
command-line()
normal-top-level()
Test tramp-test25-file-selinux condition:
(ert-test-failed
((should-not
(equal
(file-selinux-context tmp-name1)
(file-selinux-context tmp-name2)))
:form
(equal
("unconfined_u" "object_r" "user_tmp_t" "s0")
("unconfined_u" "object_r" "user_tmp_t" "s0"))
:value t :explanation nil))
FAILED 29/41 tramp-test25-file-selinux
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#29287
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 13 Nov 2017 20:10:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #6 received at 29287 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
PS I think the flaw is in this bit:
;; Different permissions mean different SELINUX context.
(set-file-modes tmp-name1 #o777)
(set-file-modes tmp-name2 #o444)
No, they don't. File modes and SELinux context are separate.
Perhaps you could use something (file-selinux-context "/") for a value
that is guaranteed to exist and be different from a temp file.
Though I don't know if users can always set a random file's context to
root_t (it works here).
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#29287
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 13 Nov 2017 20:12:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #9 received at 29287 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
PPS Nitpick: it's "SELinux", not "SELINUX".
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#29287
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 14 Nov 2017 09:26:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #12 received at 29287 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org> writes:
> Perhaps you could use something (file-selinux-context "/") for a value
> that is guaranteed to exist and be different from a temp file.
> Though I don't know if users can always set a random file's context to
> root_t (it works here).
I've used another approach, hoping it is generic enough.
Could you, pls, check whether my patch (committed to the emacs-26
branch) works for you?
Thanks, and best regards, Michael.
bug marked as fixed in version 26.0.91, send any further explanations to
29287 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
Request was from
Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Tue, 14 Nov 2017 17:21:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#29287
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 14 Nov 2017 17:23:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 29287 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Works for me, thanks.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 13 Dec 2017 12:24:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 7 years and 186 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.