From unknown Thu Sep 11 06:33:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#29256: maxima: The SGC segfault recovery test failed with memprotect_bad_fault_address, SGC disabled Resent-From: Alex Vong Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 10:51:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 29256 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 29256@debbugs.gnu.org, guix-devel@gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org, guix-devel@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.15103974533158 (code B ref -1); Sat, 11 Nov 2017 10:51:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Nov 2017 10:50:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34769 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eDTNF-0000or-CC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 05:50:53 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45958) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eDTND-0000of-6r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 05:50:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eDTN6-00056q-IL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 05:50:45 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:59824) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eDTN6-00056f-EB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 05:50:44 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36916) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eDTN5-0003vG-7i for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 05:50:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eDTN4-000569-Fg for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 05:50:43 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22d]:53514) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eDTMz-00055G-As; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 05:50:37 -0500 Received: by mail-pg0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id s2so9270642pge.10; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 02:50:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=1RmsLhEROv7orF/kWVKlbNbQXeOoJmJ/hU+QpQoGrIY=; b=ngUZvC9mdpoGdLWt63xDLdk6fdWTl4jXF8DW7emsCjReD+EF1yCZmsDckt43H/bX0X OdP7OENZ1hwEOTsDfY8J1cEjIiA5rPx1gBV3E4pTGTUfE7eRsmUR5DJctwEThhPe8yqZ pA+id5G1X27IC4re7BbTv8qlU4rcsI4POva1Y72ZiD/vEGm7IxuCSq6AGq1lAl79aYfm bWz6kOhEBKb0/EW581N0TzpgwfnfGs2Kuweoz9snHzWmdqfTOCw38jjDi9r8/NGECcSL 237yTo1twtxlX9LaeM8IyNk9X5KaApW2Z3DvMCzDo9BSa9M80Gr1AVhqqj48lee9ezcN ETvg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :mime-version; bh=1RmsLhEROv7orF/kWVKlbNbQXeOoJmJ/hU+QpQoGrIY=; b=fgA0w1ZbRbNsMoclpf9uD2h5NvEHI88dodKg8gIPKVQBTs3O3erPngvBVnnO6HskoD ZvjGL5efulAtktqGXr38TDjb7ELNGkHT/gEC8m5NCla4bCN+2C+F3rTdjSp5qmfJLauz ypZIGwJxyIsQQPWhNxhQMMwJ5t8pbRXJXHV2RZUYf0yD9Kctxi386I7aOubzXOntfkij SkxT9KfpL/mAkNF0SLsP3u5LsWCPSmJfLrtVbxc4eBy8OEBuCKd3phgFp2yiMzuMHdZH K055QjgwYGnpdxaPxz2djaVpjfUlUrm0XISpvybgfNFuGOUl5KpsE4oWhYP0Mymf0Bly 45XQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX4TayXpjk+eUNeEsNBRv4+bJPNPckObLOjW+kDwLirvpWV/LQU4 C4ZZfn4GaxchuRbteP6njNL6OQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMb9aFLzTTZ5ehq0FBz5LEFCFae92yfAyH9ZGgPChihToGfuV47DpVtd8eztbQJmBgIMMj0TyQ== X-Received: by 10.159.207.134 with SMTP id z6mr3375550plo.144.1510397436028; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 02:50:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (n218250043242.netvigator.com. [218.250.43.242]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 15sm15510070pfm.158.2017.11.11.02.50.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 11 Nov 2017 02:50:35 -0800 (PST) From: Alex Vong Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 18:50:26 +0800 Message-ID: <87ineh9jil.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hello all, When I start maxima, I get the following warning message: The SGC segfault recovery test failed with memprotect_bad_fault_address, SGC disabled The SGC segfault recovery test failed with memprotect_bad_fault_address, SGC disabled Maxima 5.41.0 http://maxima.sourceforge.net using Lisp GNU Common Lisp (GCL) GCL 2.6.12 Distributed under the GNU Public License. See the file COPYING. Dedicated to the memory of William Schelter. The function bug_report() provides bug reporting information. Actually I encountered this problem quite a while ago after an update, but I didn't report it since it was not fetal. Does anyone knows what's going on? Cheers, Alex --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEdZDkzSn0Cycogr9IxYq4eRf1Ea4FAloG1fIACgkQxYq4eRf1 Ea4LTRAAvhfFzFrP++LCf8P0GVMWksoC5o3OLNFMST6Wi5vxG8KbxqEAnen6cnjr QQwGqmCOZOF0+Hbftv1dQOgsMKFHVcLGk/vB3flQquKiiyhheDlyWrNjlJOjWD2r iEOJHlLtH0nztRghccw2IiI84uTz91q0q/A607m6NQVvgxcg1HjXF99j7Pb552br J6iA39mWVbtCYaSqUdyF3ZNChtgysxLafxXEgOXAkz4PMqSm729VnJOiEblvFlgs exl2QfW/9jq8f1ThWxOKso+pScRNqfPzPmy0KjCZmNdQEuT+7Jp6IIxyZlAJ/eGN B4ttaIKhmkPe+OeIjw2TmmdMRO0yi+cEkhLSIly05M5Dc/B1vIGHPz64VG7S7jMW pbKEHg3mwcF6FQeDTAcgKEJ6k9ICWCYGMlIwgKFINmhzm2M/mNBVITv2sQtdoxoQ PWj1mPBjuc8AdjUewRILR4eu23mBtksOKxoLhrRcwFY/2JkS8bojYj1edxTFKi7z 4JMUcvD3fxVAi3uMal+YrErMo6A2YFgVYg01S8uQBEGoaoeLodPZsd+15u0sYHP/ Z80/UiVkeP/q0LVP75yEJR4uABi58qkNUoQPb6bPGXrNSn8+6GBz4QUxM3dY6ZSA yZoLCkI7VPV8jQGF/dVBmirWeZmMf2Qd3u98+LdfRuB8lNVn6aM= =nm3p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Thu Sep 11 06:33:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#29256: maxima: The SGC segfault recovery test failed with memprotect_bad_fault_address, SGC disabled In-Reply-To: <87ineh9jil.fsf@gmail.com> Resent-From: Kei Kebreau Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 17:40:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 29256 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Alex Vong Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, 29256@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.151068118325906 (code B ref -1); Tue, 14 Nov 2017 17:40:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Nov 2017 17:39:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40484 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eEfBW-0006jl-Lv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 12:39:42 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41684) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eEfBV-0006jW-3W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 12:39:41 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eEfBP-0004BT-1P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 12:39:35 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:33082) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eEfBO-0004BF-U1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 12:39:34 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60856) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eEfBN-000580-C9 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 12:39:34 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eEfBJ-00046g-EL for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 12:39:33 -0500 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:52115) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eEfBJ-000448-73 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 12:39:29 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E85820BB6 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 18:39:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3ybvrn31Ccz10Hh; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 18:39:20 +0100 (CET) From: Kei Kebreau References: <87ineh9jil.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 12:38:53 -0500 Message-ID: <87wp2syd3m.fsf@posteo.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Alex Vong writes: > Hello all, > > When I start maxima, I get the following warning message: > > The SGC segfault recovery test failed with > memprotect_bad_fault_address, SGC disabled > The SGC segfault recovery test failed with > memprotect_bad_fault_address, SGC disabled > Maxima 5.41.0 http://maxima.sourceforge.net > using Lisp GNU Common Lisp (GCL) GCL 2.6.12 > Distributed under the GNU Public License. See the file COPYING. > Dedicated to the memory of William Schelter. > The function bug_report() provides bug reporting information. > > Actually I encountered this problem quite a while ago after an update, > but I didn't report it since it was not fetal. When did you first notice this issue? > > Does anyone knows what's going on? > > Cheers, > Alex Hello Alex, This is my first time running into this issue. While I do get this warning message using the Maxima substitute from hydra.gnu.org, when I build Maxima 5.41.0 from source locally, this warning message does not appear. Is this the case for you as well? The message comes from the source code of GNU Common Lisp, but the GCL binary from hydra.gnu.org doesn't give this error when I run it. It seems like this comes down a bug in GCL set off by Maxima, a bug in Maxima, a reproducibility issue, or some combination of all of these. I'll be investigating this further. Thank you, Kei --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEg7ZwOtzKO2lLzi2m5qXuPBlGeg0FAloLKjAACgkQ5qXuPBlG eg2u0hAAg1Bl4BwyjaTYaytNaHG7WTiIxCcdP0QVq2aLM4Wuxlc4Vl8iBf8uE/7x qtsE5odPZiLfsrbbFKQlltv3VX8k8B4lsRxz7uc/IWO56jdTU6wbctNjOZMShK5P rUqjCwkxFMjptjpehOht7a0PBacBfXTEjtWkmadfHqSJJRnfbzBtOeHnrVWciR97 fPv0LNsYV0eM6B4rvAs312PatUwlaExzv2FN79CfGBn8rmPSg+4tXzXTrm43MmP9 EXPalSikIWS3rA62aPFcdGJTMa5uxK2V5MdEZ/eNKtWuJMXwrObFRQEJ+R0OXydb T/P0I5kqSZgiEGLOPw3qka4JOfDgvScCWqUBG6tsGoVyeHBpguJ9Tn3qayC/hRe2 S4z0ITgFD3j5c5sYeWP3DCr3zUc4Ihj5eGKriwLM/mLiGxKdI9LFxdSmN5pE4U0d p6gnkWxRl3dCSXJjPaP/hbUp3Ahn/Tm5hH+QXwI6AHIAherVKNRkQyHQ+Sq+6dIH cOD5sb6eTjIVakxXAiS25TAWFjFzvDYCcrcegASUdQLa2/07vT9CD4WHZZPBo0FN ht+trRIHrH+EhQBKWErxDhmoWjSkGYULyBF1FqFxCouo8lZZ422IHWoiGSQOIchl NgArpSjWRsbfF6l9t3j8NPVdXbWca9Z81NbNWZnd0Dn4/luHF8w= =HKQu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Thu Sep 11 06:33:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#29256: maxima: The SGC segfault recovery test failed with memprotect_bad_fault_address, SGC disabled Resent-From: Alex Vong Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 17:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 29256 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Kei Kebreau Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, 29256@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.151085358627068 (code B ref -1); Thu, 16 Nov 2017 17:34:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Nov 2017 17:33:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43831 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eFO2E-00072V-Av for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 12:33:06 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38742) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eFO2C-000721-Mt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 12:33:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eFO26-0001Ac-2e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 12:32:59 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:54926) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eFO25-0001AR-VR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 12:32:58 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57937) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eFO24-00055h-H3 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 12:32:57 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eFO23-00016h-GG for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 12:32:56 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c05::234]:56369) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eFO1y-00010j-3Z; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 12:32:50 -0500 Received: by mail-pg0-x234.google.com with SMTP id z184so15679346pgd.13; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 09:32:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=bT/dHbjhe1K3B5xIkY3Ika+W4gKX2kO0QArxo667VYc=; b=cHSkOWW6JQG+lgcwsJB8Xlcj7jNmwgL2Xs2dS01/r4tYEKDyzTI25rJhcT2xLrE3tA AbJmqwvBDTDVG27b6//yKNDCGPPGrEqOYGplKaPq5NOfxX2QmVU4n6TyYJf7JJcU26vW lVPHObUTWfxzMWvpgWxJIoqK1D9tntun9gZXAYcATwiKwU9uBcGnI/KlxIGY2ONZNym/ 66sEq+eK9Zc8VARiW1fvO1mVT76ho4zfernmzabWUVr5wZHp5O97NBzqy1DRM4FNUT1p X8b56zdFXfuujYhib6KQK++jAfcYJQS3IE0+LAosWL+fHAAwt1g2guaa+K6CgO88fOJ/ 59oQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=bT/dHbjhe1K3B5xIkY3Ika+W4gKX2kO0QArxo667VYc=; b=giHmK+o5yeeYStD9xNUl+js7DCcJwQMuipJJhPOraSE1PHnLAvRuhZYa4XqjmwbJPq T1DgEkMnShtOcaUkNqX9f08EzRJ/QzsDMsMpUZAeO+fBlhcCfChwtnBE9j7xzzPLUf4X k1MyUdC76wNbDs0L1TATrTfP583gnIyUk3TKQHVqEmWMc5yL0TvhKi8gQtmLlUsJ5HbV U7KAwb6g7CJZEavTB/QoKYRb7bWbdqVAwqXGj/T1ZWttBF5/RWNmMZjBkUPPKy8HfwpJ MPR2RWKIXNVy6cmjNGnSKLPfVFRCB5aRO/2QM8y0i1eMNqgDCfJxqny8ZzUtKeartRi6 QVLA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX6x0+vOuiLi2Hy1u9oSQDb/m2lfnu5QbY5dnfwpeYQHYd3PXFRR yT4SZs8faCr+I8FVXI+Wl58= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMab+fzGWSPs+r9k7ArzRJaksOr89RVheOEWFtC2CJ+DAPcufC9oSqPz0YisZcM0eOLFepud7Q== X-Received: by 10.98.86.17 with SMTP id k17mr2623833pfb.127.1510853568787; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 09:32:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (1-64-83-015.static.netvigator.com. [1.64.83.15]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a7sm2963175pgt.39.2017.11.16.09.32.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 16 Nov 2017 09:32:47 -0800 (PST) From: Alex Vong In-Reply-To: <87wp2syd3m.fsf@posteo.net> (Kei Kebreau's message of "Tue, 14 Nov 2017 12:38:53 -0500") References: <87ineh9jil.fsf@gmail.com> <87wp2syd3m.fsf@posteo.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 01:32:39 +0800 Message-ID: <87375ep1s8.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Kei Kebreau writes: > Alex Vong writes: > >> Hello all, >> >> When I start maxima, I get the following warning message: >> >> The SGC segfault recovery test failed with >> memprotect_bad_fault_address, SGC disabled >> The SGC segfault recovery test failed with >> memprotect_bad_fault_address, SGC disabled >> Maxima 5.41.0 http://maxima.sourceforge.net >> using Lisp GNU Common Lisp (GCL) GCL 2.6.12 >> Distributed under the GNU Public License. See the file COPYING. >> Dedicated to the memory of William Schelter. >> The function bug_report() provides bug reporting information. >> >> Actually I encountered this problem quite a while ago after an update, >> but I didn't report it since it was not fetal. > > When did you first notice this issue? > I am afraid I cannot remember exactly when... I installed wxmaxima long ago and things worked fine for a long time. One day, after updating wxmaxima, it showed the above warning and started to crash nondeterministically when I typed things into the message box. The crash was fixed quickly by another update, but the warning persisted.=20 >> >> Does anyone knows what's going on? >> >> Cheers, >> Alex > > Hello Alex, > > This is my first time running into this issue. While I do get this > warning message using the Maxima substitute from hydra.gnu.org, when I > build Maxima 5.41.0 from source locally, this warning message does not > appear. Is this the case for you as well? > Same for me. I set --prefix during configure and install it somewhere. It starts without the warning. > The message comes from the source code of GNU Common Lisp, but the GCL > binary from hydra.gnu.org doesn't give this error when I run it. It > seems like this comes down a bug in GCL set off by Maxima, a bug in > Maxima, a reproducibility issue, or some combination of all of > these. I'll be investigating this further. > > Thank you, > Kei Thanks for looking at it! --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEdZDkzSn0Cycogr9IxYq4eRf1Ea4FAloNy7cACgkQxYq4eRf1 Ea6eVg/+NORjKMbSN3CFZa/oNLO4xiUJ1Y2feKwmRVkPxNohdhqMjXdSDcAKahrc qbOWA0ei0zoaxF4gOXbNhCIL5pMiBLCEnzuV4JlJg9c8O991fdcSSLb98a6sXGKN Gyt5PH7ZQf6j9GjkUo5/f5OKdBJwULJTmVgjbDbxKwwjH/3ARwyjf1vWsysWTkoa TMnZzMlzPlc/94IU4RzupU/SNmfmwRnZifAxYfFoLGy/eu6Y/7VQlezCCsoqSvVo nwe2P9Gii6x7+4fU6vs3VoeBW2giTcMRTJgV/Yv3wuTAZi69kyiJjlPzojof2kPY 9ETxs6F+aDCTveXlfSlt6ta2raPWz1XR1uAgUap1F1aXNAsCf2js7dZ5QS7k/PdV qhEspaPaRxXTXeeToMYMBsNm2WtQ0vzo5dZHUe79GlMAncnWdzWpUQX4fWTybFjG EymozduivPopU7QeoLJwJfml9cESYwOWoHdxh5HK0BNJKC2q9RY6qI2zOf1HBXPt KPQ3D+yMVXz0xJROMgdqUsThbIlyjsCnWe7oYfvps7ZKKRd3mS3ywKYzyB3A2538 mHC2BgJ2N8nff9lXn/tfvVcaohjfH3+06atlXvBl70LpWKZDb3PU+YAcXJtNs0ku fUYneoARfDqgRECdmZFeX5b21X0LocvwwaMquPxokPEjLkyGlS8= =Eu44 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Thu Sep 11 06:33:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#29256: maxima: The SGC segfault recovery test failed with memprotect_bad_fault_address, SGC disabled Resent-From: Kei Kebreau Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 17:44:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 29256 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Alex Vong Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, 29256@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.151137260616617 (code B ref -1); Wed, 22 Nov 2017 17:44:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Nov 2017 17:43:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53027 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eHZ3V-0004Jx-Rh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 12:43:26 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47776) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eHZ3U-0004Jl-3j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 12:43:24 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHZ3N-00011l-LM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 12:43:18 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:54366) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHZ3N-00011f-I3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 12:43:17 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38740) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHZ3M-0006DV-2o for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 12:43:17 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHZ3I-0000zJ-1r for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 12:43:16 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.141]:36246) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHZ3H-0000y9-Kl for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 12:43:11 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A997020F03 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 18:43:03 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1511372583; bh=CZbwUOXw9KSjtpgSnCuMIpntvqJ5Ga/vT9zdi4KfBp8=; h=From:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=mkJtbXM8I7fDhLUfBYkfA402IemKB726AvlPEdIh+5+eu1uLwQBZoWYk/YzxlAzHt VXPd3cep9WU8SSnE2P8EiwLin3xka7FonxBKd2zdsbUeYLYHcFlpsdPklqCflpN9xa phDk5aI9Ie+Fl0Cj9oR61vk8rC+E19jj+D/0ZLD9nLNzf2YaydMzeA2cs0xPZqz8eU 0X896O8LGPSx5OYGxBREVc5+zJ1awEezsDxPkhzpjCd9atuMo3jw5zxjCbTKoT3Vl5 ZUmJz4LGNYEl5XWQsvtJBZ+3NgBWJAegQXR/EedvQef85e/QS4BBlQiqNyInV06bgx 99ZyOpJB+q2mw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3yhqYL3trRz9rxS; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 18:43:00 +0100 (CET) From: Kei Kebreau References: <87ineh9jil.fsf@gmail.com> <87wp2syd3m.fsf@posteo.net> <87375ep1s8.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 12:42:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87375ep1s8.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Vong's message of "Fri, 17 Nov 2017 01:32:39 +0800") Message-ID: <87r2sqjjl7.fsf@posteo.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alex Vong writes: > Kei Kebreau writes: > >> Alex Vong writes: >> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> When I start maxima, I get the following warning message: >>> >>> The SGC segfault recovery test failed with >>> memprotect_bad_fault_address, SGC disabled >>> The SGC segfault recovery test failed with >>> memprotect_bad_fault_address, SGC disabled >>> Maxima 5.41.0 http://maxima.sourceforge.net >>> using Lisp GNU Common Lisp (GCL) GCL 2.6.12 >>> Distributed under the GNU Public License. See the file COPYING. >>> Dedicated to the memory of William Schelter. >>> The function bug_report() provides bug reporting information. >>> >>> Actually I encountered this problem quite a while ago after an update, >>> but I didn't report it since it was not fetal. >> >> When did you first notice this issue? >> > I am afraid I cannot remember exactly when... > > I installed wxmaxima long ago and things worked fine for a long > time. One day, after updating wxmaxima, it showed the above warning and > started to crash nondeterministically when I typed things into the > message box. The crash was fixed quickly by another update, but the > warning persisted.=20 > >>> >>> Does anyone knows what's going on? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Alex >> >> Hello Alex, >> >> This is my first time running into this issue. While I do get this >> warning message using the Maxima substitute from hydra.gnu.org, when I >> build Maxima 5.41.0 from source locally, this warning message does not >> appear. Is this the case for you as well? >> > Same for me. I set --prefix during configure and install it > somewhere. It starts without the warning. > >> The message comes from the source code of GNU Common Lisp, but the GCL >> binary from hydra.gnu.org doesn't give this error when I run it. It >> seems like this comes down a bug in GCL set off by Maxima, a bug in >> Maxima, a reproducibility issue, or some combination of all of >> these. I'll be investigating this further. >> >> Thank you, >> Kei > > Thanks for looking at it! I turns out that the issue is with stratified garbage collection in GCL. The substitute from hydra.gnu.org does in fact give me the error when I run "(si::sgc-on t)" in the REPL. I'm preparing a patch to update GCL to the version used in Debian stable (GCL git tag "pathnames1.13") and we'll see if changing that definition on the master branch will do anything. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEg7ZwOtzKO2lLzi2m5qXuPBlGeg0FAloVtxUACgkQ5qXuPBlG eg2kCQ/+IxSeiMgJFhIWT+5UBz1p6ovV0HOZjNNezIi81Gm9Zs0iOOisI2R2QEeh hNPH/89isqwbNvGDsJ+iu1LEDGlHnvCruhdIf+WTtmwck/E4ZwUKSgwTq6qR9nlY rBBHSpLqtq7yM0PRAJpqmQUT9zMEStcRkDpxhPD6Q4577dA2dUQDPEIVhMBUW8M7 /nvkNHD0PXYgQzrd7X9a2EKj5uHMuYfYrJhkTnG6IWFGJLNVqi+OXeWRIAh05MRR HJm7sUoNjgt7FYAxELXPt+sY8HgkGO02qrO4EhXIkKn5Csn19gMiTo5Bxq6kyegp yPoJwVPX+frVbJyLZwWkIlFSRdku+iwKcvrPyGOw4bZHT06hMMOWFNz0rwdjNN0A CpuSbFFQNub7DTWL8sO8uAgcFlpNePSlfwyM3FbGTnIxWSL33GHlMvqtCwI0bYTw fP7WBCBEHwvydvzGaRMWwMvPAcc1vztmNHfSF3csZEw+DSru0ukNqC0bvezioslE EKzAa8f3nRMEejXoJSlGcM12yY8ByZ/7ZwqfNYX88DW7qM3AMSGGfO9V+sHRA8Uo 82wpOrh1WPd5UWfe/9guVXhhtg5ptEYBUN7yjQfZNohHQVi+xVzc6cH2oloD/88U Ro1AZXpSoHePoYeV7fYox6Ms+7LmWw/hGarBeFrpdb1C1cuVd6A= =ynwN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Thu Sep 11 06:33:37 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#29256: maxima: The SGC segfault recovery test failed with memprotect_bad_fault_address, SGC disabled Resent-From: Kei Kebreau Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 17:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 29256 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Alex Vong Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, 29256@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.151137278816933 (code B ref -1); Wed, 22 Nov 2017 17:47:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Nov 2017 17:46:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53032 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eHZ6S-0004P3-C7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 12:46:28 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48858) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eHZ6Q-0004Op-JB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 12:46:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHZ6K-0002SR-K0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 12:46:21 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:58279) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHZ6K-0002S5-Gp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 12:46:20 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39823) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHZ6J-00071u-Ft for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 12:46:20 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHZ6F-0002Pg-Fa for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 12:46:19 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.141]:48457) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHZ6F-0002PF-8H for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 12:46:15 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83BA220EB0 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 18:46:13 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1511372773; bh=BX7nNLCC2sK3eRRRRQVxIBJiB9ZTOnEiFbFxkhZ7ZI4=; h=From:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=iY0CP1JE44BffnW/p0O3XceUoSMOqkGDk0pepC48XgjT7+R3kZaCERrCCSaSDow8i X3C06zZ/3W47kKW9lFucaz77BX81dJ5j+2wWexRKlrG7gpZwIgOsk9+Fuc+PJe8IDq USpEp5slpHBzMPDkMA+ljwhqhPbwQqeS3JKpgvWRMeOxqQ6M9NCkChyt9k3V285zaq MPzW7xSw1PiWfG1WqklqJiB4A7oonRJK+CM/2CsycDmaXvFKXKORQlrMSFAewNexto hLeAra8XzCLkRKr0hJhCuvrl59L0tyry5q59bbVdHPFTfmFSthGO7Fx+c029QllPwc RmxLygfFEEuDw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3yhqcz6hWvz9rxT; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 18:46:11 +0100 (CET) From: Kei Kebreau References: <87ineh9jil.fsf@gmail.com> <87wp2syd3m.fsf@posteo.net> <87375ep1s8.fsf@gmail.com> <87r2sqjjl7.fsf@posteo.net> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 12:46:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87r2sqjjl7.fsf@posteo.net> (Kei Kebreau's message of "Wed, 22 Nov 2017 12:42:44 -0500") Message-ID: <87mv3ejjfl.fsf@posteo.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Kei Kebreau writes: > > I turns out that the issue is with stratified garbage collection in > GCL. The substitute from hydra.gnu.org does in fact give me the error > when I run "(si::sgc-on t)" in the REPL. I'm preparing a patch to update > GCL to the version used in Debian stable (GCL git tag "pathnames1.13") and > we'll see if changing that definition on the master branch will do anything. On second thought, the patches applied to Debian Sid's GCL look useful as well. Anyway, keep an eye out for my update patch. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEg7ZwOtzKO2lLzi2m5qXuPBlGeg0FAloVt94ACgkQ5qXuPBlG eg04WA/5AYHn+WFuZktUH+WrEKpMzToK3bo+FHixXCLHT9qdnE1yjc8663u0FCID ctuz3kjbBvTL3gTTMPPHCaPQti93Co9UIPG3COG/8hGndPorw5LcnZPK6zZG6RgH NjvreeZsIsaEd+iT9UVXXV4TI84jRXds3+0BlD25EY0AEaV3WB784Hognsg+V13R WQ0h+p/QdXNBCIZxvQ+TgoF0O9gKREyd6THvKs8Ki0Jn7aHRaQmNoFRif69B0OLj pMNSk7Z0t9AOM2WWwHxJeZIgEXHD8gMtE5pdUbyvJ2m5nPT3IPvfA+d1+gQX01o0 bSX9B/z8wgnNVQPLBO+LeA9EuJHQw+XZKiSbb6cuY0BAAgEKTKB3zNxdZWY2CNwf ecvmM4SUxSP4cWTzXg90A8K5dpHb+V1Wu573Wtmwp6qO9jlAgI/BLBGt0pqzUVyf VDKxCBeyCWMbm5SMBhzy20rSbNQ1qLMViSwclY9yzcHJhTJyTe/kWSeh+BaFgM4m LEXyiVKoEJOFHMX7AcNGb1BrQ0oQmvNPa9mvDo3gk0Th8pu0vFTyq7+GvF8c++tw G4qR+wExy0vTTmLJ1aCMzrE0jHBSBI9MB9CKs/SvzyUr9ADAVxfRHZep6niXT9pt XRCGEGW/R2cYXIrbAmuLVuzktrPF5bR/nJFfnDbp2DzfknWiV4w= =+2wC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Thu Sep 11 06:33:37 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Alex Vong Subject: bug#29256: closed (Re: maxima: The SGC segfault recovery test failed with memprotect_bad_fault_address, SGC disabled) Message-ID: References: <87fu928mxh.fsf@gmail.com> <87ineh9jil.fsf@gmail.com> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 29256 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix Reply-To: 29256@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2017 14:16:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1511619362-28953-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1511619362-28953-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #29256: maxima: The SGC segfault recovery test failed with memprotect_bad_f= ault_address, SGC disabled which was filed against the guix package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 29256@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 29256: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D29256 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1511619362-28953-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 29256-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2017 14:15:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56839 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eIbEp-0007W2-4u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 09:15:23 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-f41.google.com ([74.125.83.41]:41062) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eIbEn-0007Vo-1J for 29256-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 09:15:21 -0500 Received: by mail-pg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id q7so4212855pgr.8 for <29256-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 06:15:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=WU73zaMEOtZyjNDF0zAEtm31zDcvdfn0G61Jo72QdPs=; b=M9pkIXR6g/W639ivjo0qSxoxyrQpTZ8NgoMvW0Hoqxoid4QfrY13G5Aqy0Rv6erIzd YoiUnrwa4OmBfPXwNDqtXho7/26Jo/joZcI5C9QHizImPcOoocwvaNmpC2wuxwB8/2eJ Jn+/GYKszeIxb/skj3dLnHRISLwgpVh2TZZWYssYf15bgSu0NOblHyOY8xvWVUCq8uBE 7MtRA7ZY+/Y5/g8JakQ5SbhktuByaOJPx1KXwhNrRI2EKDP2i/q1LXP7PpKPQru1MHxg ZKnHSgvSYt0tkunLQ8CFxgi1l//yYDvvgvm6bgWo8gx5z51ASPx7EYlM4WEsag8icKWL XJ4g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=WU73zaMEOtZyjNDF0zAEtm31zDcvdfn0G61Jo72QdPs=; b=M4mEKYzJHV129iAntj5/DjjXuwzSE2FEUS12MzF4Wr3Vnzf2kNvQcUme7NhOFgeYLv q4PME/1nYaF2K2uW1jN3aorM749uiZIGOfaNsxxAX16Sr5KFn0k5j4JFIBSOgCzkm+wB sevm7xTQ+9F6o1qdoqET8Mk3eJn6sD47Lxd+yTl3lDXft8irOBdnVxgBZABT/g4gG2Q0 RfPCWpb/qRudFR8YnHUOpWsGHYa6fGNdhvMfCzZf9dh+KIg1Q9PJEIxkLzL+z0w+5oIl ydi1+pSKtHqWEI0xeOwXJ8jDQZvN5R04RY4tFaNiAx61ksCIOBwiFlw67sKXXN3tzx07 oY6Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX5lkxqBfeElolsPdx8ZYUwyiX8MyVQEJO1FGJtBYh/Tr/y1FdaU KA1tK1ozEY1rgblLwcaxYaM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMYQK+c8misJZlAaTABMKaCbnYyn0M+fsPjxuYfFJBv6iG/S/y5HEUtSCPLcCpClei95+z1cVA== X-Received: by 10.98.197.68 with SMTP id j65mr31167216pfg.176.1511619315020; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 06:15:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (n058152177150.netvigator.com. [58.152.177.150]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h6sm39481978pgn.63.2017.11.25.06.15.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 25 Nov 2017 06:15:14 -0800 (PST) From: Alex Vong To: Kei Kebreau Subject: Re: maxima: The SGC segfault recovery test failed with memprotect_bad_fault_address, SGC disabled In-Reply-To: <87mv3ejjfl.fsf@posteo.net> (Kei Kebreau's message of "Wed, 22 Nov 2017 12:46:06 -0500") References: <87ineh9jil.fsf@gmail.com> <87wp2syd3m.fsf@posteo.net> <87375ep1s8.fsf@gmail.com> <87r2sqjjl7.fsf@posteo.net> <87mv3ejjfl.fsf@posteo.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2017 22:15:06 +0800 Message-ID: <87fu928mxh.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 29256-done Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, 29256-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Kei Kebreau writes: > Kei Kebreau writes: >> >> I turns out that the issue is with stratified garbage collection in >> GCL. The substitute from hydra.gnu.org does in fact give me the error >> when I run "(si::sgc-on t)" in the REPL. I'm preparing a patch to update >> GCL to the version used in Debian stable (GCL git tag "pathnames1.13") and >> we'll see if changing that definition on the master branch will do anything. > > On second thought, the patches applied to Debian Sid's GCL look useful > as well. Anyway, keep an eye out for my update patch. Thank you! The patch works, the warning has gone. I am closing this bug. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEdZDkzSn0Cycogr9IxYq4eRf1Ea4FAloZeuoACgkQxYq4eRf1 Ea5IIQ//QmFptjXnA+EebXqb+RF9QPAmCV/i+vhPqZjnjya8wYsI13En14OhO16Q xNHuQage/ziWqsvyxpCtd6KIXkn5gvxY9vGFnSXGmt2ndJ1f6kB5MdMwhawuy1E9 Ni6ymcftnul6Jx2mqlW/Hf0ZPHaV/FSvWVm0h8aSArajqLO3V1qHy379+wmtiQDn 8oTzBUuLFoxRri2VKQbVQOwYUfuOT1Uhrv/5/GftZTJ8W4bErCXJFC5SeqGkxize qoT7ie3I8+wjRbk1iicTB/EpNw6CwGLNHJOFwShUWxomTCaYf38CI7FbHaqyxknQ S8WQV4I8HxdO0W9tg9fNck46v5w6KF7P+re/QmWQXcNFd4W4UVk5JAd00GBNLUNB UDCh3p3LIHSX+pSrIwxUSjnoI8LabAvy9XenwEXWU1KhpcLzwsTNxCa4bjf1AHjR vv6sF0KHotq262zBZLg4YHLiWftuvZ+ppBUkAc2juhFTuVpy6WbZuUfcUCdMFny9 UKOAcymcrQuFiEBhY+ww6Hb/JAZpdzRtRsJw2s8eSvlq/5u/+BwuQ17g+pNT84ya OY/ilG0aOyMzKDiU4lrjErpHRdtnG4gzVfMsP/aXLK+5MKGuJPQUt5XMPYon98Hu HUWyLRWMshBsxf+8SkumJEIo/aO0La9bkfsDNsfkLvxyBTdmmOA= =5cSY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- ------------=_1511619362-28953-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Nov 2017 10:50:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34769 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eDTNF-0000or-CC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 05:50:53 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45958) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eDTND-0000of-6r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 05:50:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eDTN6-00056q-IL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 05:50:45 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:59824) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eDTN6-00056f-EB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 05:50:44 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36916) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eDTN5-0003vG-7i for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 05:50:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eDTN4-000569-Fg for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 05:50:43 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22d]:53514) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eDTMz-00055G-As; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 05:50:37 -0500 Received: by mail-pg0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id s2so9270642pge.10; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 02:50:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=1RmsLhEROv7orF/kWVKlbNbQXeOoJmJ/hU+QpQoGrIY=; b=ngUZvC9mdpoGdLWt63xDLdk6fdWTl4jXF8DW7emsCjReD+EF1yCZmsDckt43H/bX0X OdP7OENZ1hwEOTsDfY8J1cEjIiA5rPx1gBV3E4pTGTUfE7eRsmUR5DJctwEThhPe8yqZ pA+id5G1X27IC4re7BbTv8qlU4rcsI4POva1Y72ZiD/vEGm7IxuCSq6AGq1lAl79aYfm bWz6kOhEBKb0/EW581N0TzpgwfnfGs2Kuweoz9snHzWmdqfTOCw38jjDi9r8/NGECcSL 237yTo1twtxlX9LaeM8IyNk9X5KaApW2Z3DvMCzDo9BSa9M80Gr1AVhqqj48lee9ezcN ETvg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :mime-version; bh=1RmsLhEROv7orF/kWVKlbNbQXeOoJmJ/hU+QpQoGrIY=; b=fgA0w1ZbRbNsMoclpf9uD2h5NvEHI88dodKg8gIPKVQBTs3O3erPngvBVnnO6HskoD ZvjGL5efulAtktqGXr38TDjb7ELNGkHT/gEC8m5NCla4bCN+2C+F3rTdjSp5qmfJLauz ypZIGwJxyIsQQPWhNxhQMMwJ5t8pbRXJXHV2RZUYf0yD9Kctxi386I7aOubzXOntfkij SkxT9KfpL/mAkNF0SLsP3u5LsWCPSmJfLrtVbxc4eBy8OEBuCKd3phgFp2yiMzuMHdZH K055QjgwYGnpdxaPxz2djaVpjfUlUrm0XISpvybgfNFuGOUl5KpsE4oWhYP0Mymf0Bly 45XQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX4TayXpjk+eUNeEsNBRv4+bJPNPckObLOjW+kDwLirvpWV/LQU4 C4ZZfn4GaxchuRbteP6njNL6OQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMb9aFLzTTZ5ehq0FBz5LEFCFae92yfAyH9ZGgPChihToGfuV47DpVtd8eztbQJmBgIMMj0TyQ== X-Received: by 10.159.207.134 with SMTP id z6mr3375550plo.144.1510397436028; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 02:50:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (n218250043242.netvigator.com. [218.250.43.242]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 15sm15510070pfm.158.2017.11.11.02.50.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 11 Nov 2017 02:50:35 -0800 (PST) From: Alex Vong To: bug-guix@gnu.org, guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: maxima: The SGC segfault recovery test failed with memprotect_bad_fault_address, SGC disabled Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 18:50:26 +0800 Message-ID: <87ineh9jil.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hello all, When I start maxima, I get the following warning message: The SGC segfault recovery test failed with memprotect_bad_fault_address, SGC disabled The SGC segfault recovery test failed with memprotect_bad_fault_address, SGC disabled Maxima 5.41.0 http://maxima.sourceforge.net using Lisp GNU Common Lisp (GCL) GCL 2.6.12 Distributed under the GNU Public License. See the file COPYING. Dedicated to the memory of William Schelter. The function bug_report() provides bug reporting information. Actually I encountered this problem quite a while ago after an update, but I didn't report it since it was not fetal. Does anyone knows what's going on? Cheers, Alex --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEdZDkzSn0Cycogr9IxYq4eRf1Ea4FAloG1fIACgkQxYq4eRf1 Ea4LTRAAvhfFzFrP++LCf8P0GVMWksoC5o3OLNFMST6Wi5vxG8KbxqEAnen6cnjr QQwGqmCOZOF0+Hbftv1dQOgsMKFHVcLGk/vB3flQquKiiyhheDlyWrNjlJOjWD2r iEOJHlLtH0nztRghccw2IiI84uTz91q0q/A607m6NQVvgxcg1HjXF99j7Pb552br J6iA39mWVbtCYaSqUdyF3ZNChtgysxLafxXEgOXAkz4PMqSm729VnJOiEblvFlgs exl2QfW/9jq8f1ThWxOKso+pScRNqfPzPmy0KjCZmNdQEuT+7Jp6IIxyZlAJ/eGN B4ttaIKhmkPe+OeIjw2TmmdMRO0yi+cEkhLSIly05M5Dc/B1vIGHPz64VG7S7jMW pbKEHg3mwcF6FQeDTAcgKEJ6k9ICWCYGMlIwgKFINmhzm2M/mNBVITv2sQtdoxoQ PWj1mPBjuc8AdjUewRILR4eu23mBtksOKxoLhrRcwFY/2JkS8bojYj1edxTFKi7z 4JMUcvD3fxVAi3uMal+YrErMo6A2YFgVYg01S8uQBEGoaoeLodPZsd+15u0sYHP/ Z80/UiVkeP/q0LVP75yEJR4uABi58qkNUoQPb6bPGXrNSn8+6GBz4QUxM3dY6ZSA yZoLCkI7VPV8jQGF/dVBmirWeZmMf2Qd3u98+LdfRuB8lNVn6aM= =nm3p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- ------------=_1511619362-28953-1--